Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Texas
Related: About this forumJustice Served? Morton says he takes no pleasure in turning tables on Williamson DA Anderson (updat
Last edited Thu Feb 7, 2013, 12:16 AM - Edit history (2)
Over seven days of trial in February 1987, Michael Morton sat at the defense table while his prosecutor, Ken Anderson, portrayed him as an emotionally cruel, perverted killer to jurors who found him guilty of murder in less than two hours.
This week, in an extraordinary reversal of fortune, it was Andersons turn to sit at a defense table while lawyers argued his fate.
A now-exonerated Morton has been about 15 feet away first on the witness stand, where he got to look Anderson in the eye while he recounted the brutality of prison and the losses he suffered, and lately from the courtroom audience, where he watches the back of Andersons head from the front-row bench he shares with his fiancee and mother.
I dont want to say that it was sweet, because it wasnt, Morton told the American-Statesman. Its like a hard duty. We dont revel in our enemys pain or suffering, but it was one of those things that I think has to happen, because the big picture here is accountability.
Through the work of Morton and his lawyers, a court of inquiry was convened Monday to examine allegations that Anderson broke state laws by hiding evidence to secure a guilty verdict, robbing Morton of 25 years of freedom, a relationship with his then-toddler son and a chance to grieve his murdered wife, Christine.
This week, in an extraordinary reversal of fortune, it was Andersons turn to sit at a defense table while lawyers argued his fate.
A now-exonerated Morton has been about 15 feet away first on the witness stand, where he got to look Anderson in the eye while he recounted the brutality of prison and the losses he suffered, and lately from the courtroom audience, where he watches the back of Andersons head from the front-row bench he shares with his fiancee and mother.
I dont want to say that it was sweet, because it wasnt, Morton told the American-Statesman. Its like a hard duty. We dont revel in our enemys pain or suffering, but it was one of those things that I think has to happen, because the big picture here is accountability.
Through the work of Morton and his lawyers, a court of inquiry was convened Monday to examine allegations that Anderson broke state laws by hiding evidence to secure a guilty verdict, robbing Morton of 25 years of freedom, a relationship with his then-toddler son and a chance to grieve his murdered wife, Christine.
More including a video interview with Morton at http://www.statesman.com/news/news/crime-law/exclusive-interview-morton-says-he-takes-no-pleasu/nWHGF/#cmComments .
2/6/2013 8:20 p.m. UPDATE: Morton's lawyer says new evidence would have made the defense.
Bill White, one of two lawyers who represented Michael Morton at his 1987 trial, stated adamantly and repeatedly that Ken Anderson never told him about two key pieces of evidence that would have made the defense.
Nobody knows what wouldve happened if we had it, but we didnt, White said,
First was the transcript of a police interview that revealed the Mortons 3-year-old son, Eric, said a monster attacked his mother while Michael Morton was not home.
Perhaps more important, White said, was a police report taken from a neighbor who said a suspicious man parked a green van on the street behind the Morton home and, on several occasions, walked into the wooded area behind their home.
Nobody knows what wouldve happened if we had it, but we didnt, White said,
First was the transcript of a police interview that revealed the Mortons 3-year-old son, Eric, said a monster attacked his mother while Michael Morton was not home.
Perhaps more important, White said, was a police report taken from a neighbor who said a suspicious man parked a green van on the street behind the Morton home and, on several occasions, walked into the wooded area behind their home.
http://www.statesman.com/news/news/crime-law/witness-describes-anderson-prosecution-strategy/nWHH6/#cmComments
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1357 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Justice Served? Morton says he takes no pleasure in turning tables on Williamson DA Anderson (updat (Original Post)
TexasTowelie
Feb 2013
OP
DollarBillHines
(1,922 posts)1. Everyone involved in the prosecution of Mr Morton should be in prison
I am well familiar with this case.
The prosecution had nothing, Morton had an alibi.
They hid everything that would have exonerated Morton.
northoftheborder
(7,572 posts)2. I hope Anderson gets prison - years - at least 25.
TexasTowelie
(112,237 posts)4. See my post below.
It doesn't look like Anderson will serve time. Considering his age, if he loses his license to practice then it will be of minor consequence.
TexasTowelie
(112,237 posts)3. Update to story.
http://www.statesman.com/news/news/crime-law/witness-describes-anderson-prosecution-strategy/nWHH6/#cmComments
One comment to the story made the point that Anderson wasn't concerned about justice, but wanted a high conviction rate to bolster his career.
The possible punishments for Anderson are public reprimand, probated suspension of his law license, active suspension of his law license, or disbarment. The judge could also force Anderson to pay the attorneys fees of the State Bar commission.
My personal opinion is that if it is proven that Anderson acted with either wanton disregard or malice that he would reimburse the state for the payouts made to exonerated prisoners. That equates to approximately $2 million.
One comment to the story made the point that Anderson wasn't concerned about justice, but wanted a high conviction rate to bolster his career.
The possible punishments for Anderson are public reprimand, probated suspension of his law license, active suspension of his law license, or disbarment. The judge could also force Anderson to pay the attorneys fees of the State Bar commission.
My personal opinion is that if it is proven that Anderson acted with either wanton disregard or malice that he would reimburse the state for the payouts made to exonerated prisoners. That equates to approximately $2 million.