Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TexasTowelie

(112,252 posts)
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 06:14 PM Feb 2013

$1 billion Riesel coal plant to go online after lawsuit, damage

The Sandy Creek coal power plant is being fired up sporadically for testing and is set to go online full-time in April, more than a year later than planned.

During the testing phase, the $1 billion plant is selling electricity into Texas’ power grid, but its contracts with wholesalers won’t go into effect until the plant is ready to run 24 hours a day, project officials said.

The plant’s boiler was badly damaged when it overheated during testing in late 2011, but that damage has now been repaired, said Mike Vogt, project manager for LS Power, which owns the plant.

In the meantime, the testing has given Riesel residents a preview of the plant’s operations. When it’s fired up, residents can see the smokestacks putting out billows of steam.

More at http://www.wacotrib.com/news/191152751.html .

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
$1 billion Riesel coal plant to go online after lawsuit, damage (Original Post) TexasTowelie Feb 2013 OP
Ummm, they're called SMOKEstacks for a reason. mbperrin Feb 2013 #1
I don't know if you saw this article from about a year ago: TexasTowelie Feb 2013 #2
Thanks, I didn't see it. All this coal business is crappy. For the people who live near mbperrin Feb 2013 #3
Oddly enough, I have relatives in Wyoming also. TexasTowelie Feb 2013 #4

mbperrin

(7,672 posts)
1. Ummm, they're called SMOKEstacks for a reason.
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 06:20 PM
Feb 2013

Burning coal emits smoke, among other poisons. Just about the filthiest form of energy, except for nuclear.

Quite stupid in the wind capital of the US to allow one of these belching monsters to poison the air, split the eardrums, and use up the water.

TexasTowelie

(112,252 posts)
2. I don't know if you saw this article from about a year ago:
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 06:47 PM
Feb 2013
http://stateimpact.npr.org/texas/2012/01/24/what-happened-at-the-sandy-creek-power-plant/

The article was featured in the Texas Tribune and I'm reasonably certain that it was posted on DU. If I can locate it in a search then I will post the link to the thread.

Some friends of mine have a second home in Riesel and I have driven through the town. I wonder how they feel about that plant nearby? The property might sell for more now that it brought jobs to area. However, the tradeoff in the quality of life, environmental effects and other social effects (increased prices and wait times) don't yield many benefits to the people that were previous residents.

mbperrin

(7,672 posts)
3. Thanks, I didn't see it. All this coal business is crappy. For the people who live near
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 10:54 PM
Feb 2013

the mines, too. I worked in Gillette, Wyoming for a year back in the 70s, and the world's largest strip coal mine is there.

(I think there's some unintended irony in the story, when it calls the mine "breathtaking", because that's exactly what all that dust in the air does - takes the breath away.)

http://wondersofwyoming.com/wyodak-coal-mine/

TexasTowelie

(112,252 posts)
4. Oddly enough, I have relatives in Wyoming also.
Fri Feb 15, 2013, 12:14 AM
Feb 2013

My brother-in-law is a geologist and a manager of a uranium mine near Rawlins. He started there in the late 80s.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Texas»$1 billion Riesel coal pl...