Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
Thu Jan 29, 2015, 12:05 PM Jan 2015

I wrote Sen Cantwell re. the TPP. She responded with jibberish.

Here is my response to her email:

Thank you for responding to my email re. the TPP.
With respect, your response was nothing more than carefully crafted rhetoric. You did not address how the TPP will help individuals. You say it will help industries and you say that those workers that lose their jobs to cheap labor overseas will be retrained.
How absurd is it to say that corporations will benefit and the TAXPAYERS will provide their own money (not money from the benefitting industries) to retrain workers. I ask you, what jobs will the displaced workers be retrained for?
You didn’t address all of the side issues that don’t pertain to trade like:
How the U.S. sovereignty will be undermined by giving corporations the right to challenge our laws before international tribunals.
How wages, benefits, and collective bargaining will be threatened.
Our ability to protect the environment will be undermined.
Our Food Safety Standards will be threatened.
Buy America laws could come to an end. Are you against “Buy American” laws?
Prescription drug prices will increase, access to life saving drugs will decrease, and the profits of drug companies will go up.
Wall Street would benefit at the expense of everyone else.
The TPP would reward authoritarian regimes like Vietnam that systematically violate human rights.
The TPP has no expiration date, making it virtually impossible to repeal.
And you forgot to discuss the Fast Track method that will essentially eliminate debate in the Senate.
I wonder if you work for the people of the State of Washington or the big corporations.


This is the second response from her on this subject. Sen Murray has also responded and has similar rhetoric.

For what good it does, keep the pressure on.

rhett
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I wrote Sen Cantwell re. the TPP. She responded with jibberish. (Original Post) rhett o rick Jan 2015 OP
Just wrote both of mine Sherman A1 Jan 2015 #1
I never got a reply from Murray Phlem Jan 2015 #2
I just called Murray fredamae Jan 2015 #3
Thanks. I will call also. nm rhett o rick Jan 2015 #4
Thx-I call them All fredamae Jan 2015 #5

Phlem

(6,323 posts)
2. I never got a reply from Murray
Thu Jan 29, 2015, 12:40 PM
Jan 2015

but yes, Cantwell's message is basically for the TPP that's why it's jibberish and I don't need to tell you how Reichart responded. We have tools as congress folk.

fredamae

(4,458 posts)
5. Thx-I call them All
Thu Jan 29, 2015, 01:42 PM
Jan 2015

Not just mine...because certainly every congressional vote ends up impacting the quality of life for All.
Many hands make a Big job small.....

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Washington»I wrote Sen Cantwell re. ...