Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Washington
Related: About this forumI wrote Sen Cantwell re. the TPP. She responded with jibberish.
Here is my response to her email:
Thank you for responding to my email re. the TPP.
With respect, your response was nothing more than carefully crafted rhetoric. You did not address how the TPP will help individuals. You say it will help industries and you say that those workers that lose their jobs to cheap labor overseas will be retrained.
How absurd is it to say that corporations will benefit and the TAXPAYERS will provide their own money (not money from the benefitting industries) to retrain workers. I ask you, what jobs will the displaced workers be retrained for?
You didnt address all of the side issues that dont pertain to trade like:
How the U.S. sovereignty will be undermined by giving corporations the right to challenge our laws before international tribunals.
How wages, benefits, and collective bargaining will be threatened.
Our ability to protect the environment will be undermined.
Our Food Safety Standards will be threatened.
Buy America laws could come to an end. Are you against Buy American laws?
Prescription drug prices will increase, access to life saving drugs will decrease, and the profits of drug companies will go up.
Wall Street would benefit at the expense of everyone else.
The TPP would reward authoritarian regimes like Vietnam that systematically violate human rights.
The TPP has no expiration date, making it virtually impossible to repeal.
And you forgot to discuss the Fast Track method that will essentially eliminate debate in the Senate.
I wonder if you work for the people of the State of Washington or the big corporations.
With respect, your response was nothing more than carefully crafted rhetoric. You did not address how the TPP will help individuals. You say it will help industries and you say that those workers that lose their jobs to cheap labor overseas will be retrained.
How absurd is it to say that corporations will benefit and the TAXPAYERS will provide their own money (not money from the benefitting industries) to retrain workers. I ask you, what jobs will the displaced workers be retrained for?
You didnt address all of the side issues that dont pertain to trade like:
How the U.S. sovereignty will be undermined by giving corporations the right to challenge our laws before international tribunals.
How wages, benefits, and collective bargaining will be threatened.
Our ability to protect the environment will be undermined.
Our Food Safety Standards will be threatened.
Buy America laws could come to an end. Are you against Buy American laws?
Prescription drug prices will increase, access to life saving drugs will decrease, and the profits of drug companies will go up.
Wall Street would benefit at the expense of everyone else.
The TPP would reward authoritarian regimes like Vietnam that systematically violate human rights.
The TPP has no expiration date, making it virtually impossible to repeal.
And you forgot to discuss the Fast Track method that will essentially eliminate debate in the Senate.
I wonder if you work for the people of the State of Washington or the big corporations.
This is the second response from her on this subject. Sen Murray has also responded and has similar rhetoric.
For what good it does, keep the pressure on.
rhett
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 2663 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (17)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I wrote Sen Cantwell re. the TPP. She responded with jibberish. (Original Post)
rhett o rick
Jan 2015
OP
Sherman A1
(38,958 posts)1. Just wrote both of mine
although I suspect it will do little good.
Phlem
(6,323 posts)2. I never got a reply from Murray
but yes, Cantwell's message is basically for the TPP that's why it's jibberish and I don't need to tell you how Reichart responded. We have tools as congress folk.
fredamae
(4,458 posts)3. I just called Murray
Cantwell, Wyden (pushing fast track btw 202-224-5244) and Merkley.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)4. Thanks. I will call also. nm
fredamae
(4,458 posts)5. Thx-I call them All
Not just mine...because certainly every congressional vote ends up impacting the quality of life for All.
Many hands make a Big job small.....