Hillary Clinton
Related: About this forumWhy is it that when Clinton holds a rally that 12,000 people attend it's a routine crowd, but...
...when 10,000 people attend a Sanders rally it's spectacular?
I like Sanders, and was open to what he said up until about a month ago, but these swarming Sanders supporters (surrogates?) descending on DU have totally turned me off to his campaign.
Response to George II (Original post)
hrmjustin This message was self-deleted by its author.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)shenmue
(38,506 posts)Dawson Leery
(19,348 posts)Also, there has been no pushback against Sanders for his NRA grade gun positions.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)there in spirit. Welcome to the Hillary room, we are very enthusiastic for our candidate. Join in and enjoy.
George II
(67,782 posts)....until Obama appeared. I expect Hillary Clinton to be no less inspiring but not as eloquent or "cool" as Obama!
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)murielm99
(30,761 posts)Neither of them have been perfect. We can't expect that. Only children expect life to be perfect. They find out in a hurry that it is not.
okasha
(11,573 posts)is competence. Hillary has that plus experience. No one else comes close to her on either.
Sanders is admirable in many ways, but I can't imagine him jawboning Congress, or doing the arm-twisting and hard bargaining that were necessary to get the Civil Rights and Voting Rights Acts passed in the '60's.
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)Bernie Sanders just launched his campaign like 4 weeks ago.
sheshe2
(83,898 posts)A member of the House? Years, sad he never made a name for himself.
murielm99
(30,761 posts)I liked Bernie, but now I am turned off, because of his supporters here. They should be called detractors.
I am still not convinced that all of them are Democrats. Some of them come here during primaries, only to disrupt. They say nothing the rest of the time.
oldandhappy
(6,719 posts)We expect Hillary to do well, and want her to do well. Bernie has done better than expected so folk are surprised and react that way and reflect that surprise by saying WOW -- look at the crowd. We are a year away from the conventions. You would not know it from the chatter! Take a couple of weeks off from campaigns!
Response to George II (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Problem solved.
still_one
(92,396 posts)SunSeeker
(51,698 posts)I know a lot of people excited about Hillary. I'm excited about her. She's smart and strong and will fight for the issues that are important to me: women's rights, healthcare, education and addressing global warming.
Trashing us and calling us names is not going to make us abandon Hillary. It will just make us annoyed at you and your candidate.
I really like Bernie, but if he attracts rude people like you, maybe he's not the man I thought he was.
joshcryer
(62,276 posts)and what "turns you on" about Hillary's campaign?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1107&pid=10761
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
"new" person comes in the safe haven and starts a series of insults. "how dull are you people" and said in the safe haven group to the people in the group. No matter who you support, this should not stand.
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Wed Jul 1, 2015, 04:09 AM, and the Jury voted 3-4 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: smells like troll be gone needed MIRT
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Have at it MIRT...
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
OKNancy
(41,832 posts)Notice the cowards who voted to leave didn't leave any reason.
SunSeeker
(51,698 posts)sunnystarr
(2,638 posts)and I'm probably being paranoid ... but I remember in the 2000 election the R's were doing every dirty thing they could think of to peel away Dem votes. So they supported Ralph Nader.
The only chance they have in 2016 is to neutralize and peel away votes for Hillary. Now if they could just energize the liberals and progressives toward a candidate who is left of the left. Bernie is perfect. Not a Democrat and liberal enough to get the Dem base excited but totally beatable when they can attack his self described label as Democratic Socialist in a general election.
The majority of voters are low information. Even today you won't get them to vote for someone who wears the Socialist label - no matter what he says or promises. Of course he can throw in how he supports European policies and turn off more voters.
So just enlist political operatives to push Bernie to Dems and throw in the red meat of liberal/progressive policies and watch the dems jump in. If by chance Hillary squeaks through the primary, Bernie's ego would be real receptive to run on the Independent ticket. After all, he is an Independent and all his new supporters would be begging him to do it. Us Dems do love the underdog. Then you have the 3 way split and the Rs can slide in their candidate.
The Rs have extremely smart strategists who have been working on a plan for a long time. This unexpected BS groundswell sure make me suspicious and on guard. I just don't know why no one else is. They did it to us in 2000. Let's not let it happen again.
SunSeeker
(51,698 posts)But then he said last Sunday he thinks he will win the nomination and the White House, and that was a surprisingly egotistical thing to come out of Bernie's mouth. He may have started believing his own press. And like I told our interloper up the thread, if Bernie keeps attracting such rude, counterproductive people as supporters, maybe Bernie is not the man I thought he was. Maybe Bernie might pull a Nader after all.
One thing's for sure. The GOP's wet dream is Bernie winning the Dem nomination or running third party in the general election.
still_one
(92,396 posts)supporters will not vote for the Democratic nominee if it is Hillary, and that mind set is pure Nader, and I won't even waste my time with them. I suspect if Hillary is the nominee, we will see some of those folks no longer a part of DU.
SunSeeker
(51,698 posts)murielm99
(30,761 posts)the next primary. Look at some of their profiles. Many of them have been here for awhile, but they have not posted much since just before the last Presidential election. They come here to disrupt during every primary and election season.
still_one
(92,396 posts)still_one
(92,396 posts)that won't support the Democratic nominee if it is Hillary here at DU. In fact, they have come out and started threads proclaiming that. Hopefully, that won't be tolerated when the nominee is chosen
still_one
(92,396 posts)evolved into the "let's bash Hillary" website.
With Hillary I write some of it off to seasonal politics, but for a segment it is blind hate
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)actual committed voters,just ask Ron Paul and Sarah Palin.
Jamaal510
(10,893 posts)Last edited Wed Jul 1, 2015, 08:21 PM - Edit history (1)
MSNBC (and probably other networks) has also been discussing his big crowds while ignoring the fact that he's not the only candidate to attract large numbers. In their case, I think they're primarily interested in giving a perception of a horserace and to come up with a story like with the 2012 election. They've been covering the polling of just one state (NH) within the D primary, but I don't see them discuss the numerous national polls as often where the margin is much more decisive. And big crowds won't mean a thing if it doesn't translate into votes and boots-on-the-ground effort. Ron Paul drew one of the largest crowds of anyone running in '08 and 2012, but came nowhere close to the White House.
George II
(67,782 posts)....Iowa and New Hampshire, neither of which are even close to overall US demographics.
His best showing is New Hampshire, which happens to share a ~200 mile border with Vermont, his home state, and has virtually identical demographics as Vermont.
If he doesn't show well in New Hampshire (and being behind 8-10% isn't all that good) how is he going to do in the midwest, south, and southwest?