Hillary Clinton
Related: About this forumLets get this Albright story right
Last edited Sun Feb 7, 2016, 04:13 PM - Edit history (1)
2 things:
First: Many are quoting the headline of Guardian-"Albright: 'special place in hell' for women who don't support Clinton"-which was wrong--trying to sensationalize the story I suspect
The actual story says---
**** Theres a special place in hell for women who dont help each other!
So the OP out in gd-p (think there are several) misquotes Albright's quote.*************
Also Point # 2
NOTE***the title of the Guardian contradicts the actual story!!
This was the headline from the Guardian:
Albright: 'special place in hell' for women who don't support Clinton
Tom McCarthy in Concord, New Hampshire
@TeeMcSee
Saturday 6 February 2016 15.36 EST
Former secretary of state Madeleine Albright introduced Hillary Clinton at an event in New Hampshire on Saturday, telling the crowd and voters in general: Theres a special place in hell for women who dont help each other!..............
Also--the context of the quote was abortion rights and the upcoming SC nominees:
....Albright was the first woman to be secretary of state and served during the presidency of Clintons husband, Bill. She closed her New Hampshire speech with an allusion to the ongoing struggle with Republicans over abortion rights.
Young women have to support Hillary Clinton. The story is not over! she said. Theyre going to want to push us back. Appointments to the supreme court make all the difference.
Its not done and you have to help. Hillary Clinton will always be there for you. And just remember, theres a special place in hell for women who dont help each other..................
http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/feb/06/madeleine-albright-campaigns-for-hillary-clinton
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Liked 418 times
Madeleine Albright Verified account ?@madeleine Feb 6
.@HillaryforNH On the road for @HillaryClinton in NH! Great start in Portsmouth! #NHprimary #ImWithHer
Stuckinthebush
(10,841 posts)Because context is so messy.
kjones
(1,053 posts)They long ago used up any "benefit of the doubt" I had been allowing them
when it comes to smears, insinuation, mischaracterizations, and omissions.
72DejaVu
(1,545 posts)they wouldn't be supporting someone who thinks every issue boils down to good guy versus bad guys.
Bleacher Creature
(11,254 posts)You are destroying a perfectly good talking point.
riversedge
(70,092 posts)OhZone
(3,212 posts)Tommy2Tone
(1,307 posts)are worse than Republicans in the sense they both constantly use personal attacks on Hillary and anyone who supports her.
If somehow he were to win I would leave the Democratic party forever.
George II
(67,782 posts)....they're not interested in truth. In fact they got downright insulting.
The fact is Albright did NOT say that!
riversedge
(70,092 posts)shadowmayor
(1,325 posts)When asked about the deaths of Iraqi children under 5 due to the sanctions imposed by the UN - numbers are in the hundreds of thousands with many indications that 1/2 million children died; Secretary Albright replied to Leslie Stahl "we think the price is worth it". The quote about women supporting women pales in comparison.
What did the Iraqi people ever do to the people of the United States? We have been bombing, burning, maiming, and hurting them for 25 years now. We destroyed their country and unleashed a civil war from hell. For what? Some goddamned oil?
mcar
(42,278 posts)Thanks.
fleabiscuit
(4,542 posts)The Iraq Sanctions Myth
Sanctions allegedly killed hundreds of thousands of children in Iraq and provided a rationale for invasion, a line still heard today. But those deaths almost certainly never happened.
http://www.psmag.com/politics-and-law/the-iraq-sanctions-myth-56433