Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Stand and Fight

(7,480 posts)
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 07:46 PM Apr 2016

Tim Robbins figures that Clinton’s South Carolina win is about as important as winning Guam

By the all seeing eye of Odin, these guys are clueless!

Tim Robbins figures that Clinton’s South Carolina win is about as important as winning Guam

Tim Robbins is an actor who was very good in "Bull Durham." He's mostly known for playing Andy Dufresne in "The Shawkshank Redemption," but the role that best exemplifies his position in the present zeitgeist was his lead in "Bob Roberts." In that, he played a conservative candidate for the Senate who (spoiler alert) is revealed to the audience as a fraud when he taps his toes. It's a little heavy-handed.

Speaking of heavy-handed! Robbins appeared at a rally in Wisconsin on Monday on behalf of Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Bernie Sanders, where he made a weird analogy.

"After the Southern primaries," he said, "you had called the election" -- apparently referring to the media. "And who's fooling who? Winning South Carolina in the Democratic primary is about as significant as winning Guam. No Democrat is going to win in the general election. Why do these victories have so much significance?"

This is a not-uncommon argument among supporters of Sanders. Yes, Hillary Clinton is winning. But she's winning largely because she ran up big margins in Southern states. That, the argument goes, bodes poorly for the general, since those Southern states usually vote Republican.

~~~~SNIP~~~~

More at Link


11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Tim Robbins figures that Clinton’s South Carolina win is about as important as winning Guam (Original Post) Stand and Fight Apr 2016 OP
Worst surrogates ever Haveadream Apr 2016 #1
Why did he and Susan Sarandon break up again? JustAnotherGen Apr 2016 #2
Well, since you asked...... LisaM Apr 2016 #6
The very first thing you need to know how to do in politics Gman Apr 2016 #3
Well, if you want to talk about historical information... Stand and Fight Apr 2016 #4
They have a well known track record. Gman Apr 2016 #5
When he played LaLouche, he wasn't acting! Tanuki Apr 2016 #11
More racist claptrap from B.S. supporters 4now Apr 2016 #7
He's getting dragged on Twitter. Starry Messenger Apr 2016 #8
Yeah, sure! BlueMTexpat Apr 2016 #9
So now Robbins is throwing people under the bus. Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Apr 2016 #10

Gman

(24,780 posts)
3. The very first thing you need to know how to do in politics
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 08:08 PM
Apr 2016

Is to count. The second thing is what to count. In the case of SC, or any other state, we are counting delegates. He sounds about as dumb as Nuke LaLouche.

Stand and Fight

(7,480 posts)
4. Well, if you want to talk about historical information...
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 08:10 PM
Apr 2016

They both also backed Nader and gave us Bush, and not the alt band or hair style choice.

Gman

(24,780 posts)
5. They have a well known track record.
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 08:11 PM
Apr 2016

They get media coverage only because of their celebrity status and activism.

As a side note, the counting, which was being calculated with their vote swapping in 2000, went horribly wrong but it was stupid to begin with.

BlueMTexpat

(15,373 posts)
9. Yeah, sure!
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 10:35 PM
Apr 2016

Bernie would have LOVED to win in SC or anywhere else in the south. But since Hillary won, her wins must be belittled.

SC and Guam? Guam is not a state. False equivalence much, Tim?

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Hillary Clinton»Tim Robbins figures that ...