Hillary Clinton
Related: About this forumI just put Jane Sanders on mute. Listened long enough. Nothing
nice from her mouth. Dissing Hill over the qualified comments.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)I hate primaries.
Satch59
(1,353 posts)She's repeating report of "disqualifying"...which has been reported as not really happening and Rachel is being pretty nice to her... Bernie can't unsay what he said about "quote unquote"...and she's trying to spin it by saying he was talking about issues, not really personal...
72DejaVu
(1,545 posts)But nuance is not the Sander's camp's strong point.
Cha
(297,425 posts)be a double whammy.
He could be qualified and still disqualify himself.. but he's not.
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(108,101 posts)You must be from New York or another state that soon will have a primary. I would have hung up.
Cha
(297,425 posts)romana
(765 posts)Courtesy of Joy Reid
Joy Reid ?@JoyAnnReid 2m2 minutes ago
Jane Sanders says Hillary Clinton and her surrogates implied he was unqualified to be president even if they didn't actually say it. #maddow
Joy Reid ?@JoyAnnReid 2m2 minutes ago
Mrs. Sanders says Bernie Sanders did not actually mean Hillary Clinton was unqualified to be president, despite saying so. #maddow
riversedge
(70,261 posts)...Joy Reid ?@JoyAnnReid 2m2 minutes ago
Mrs. Sanders says Bernie Sanders did not actually mean Hillary Clinton was unqualified to be president, despite saying so. #maddow
Cha
(297,425 posts)Mahalo romana~
UtahLib
(3,179 posts)I turned it off. I've never heard anything of value come from her mouth.
By the way Rachel, where's Bill? Oh yeah, you don't like interviewing the spouses of the candidates. What a farce.
Hekate
(90,753 posts)DemonGoddess
(4,640 posts)I looked at his "victory" fund. The only disbursements are for some kind of clerical, and no incoming.
riversedge
(70,261 posts)DemonGoddess
(4,640 posts)is the fund that was seeded with $1000 by the DNC to start him off on fundraising for down ballot. He has contributed NOTHING to it. NADA, ZILCH, ZIPPO
riversedge
(70,261 posts)Iliyah
(25,111 posts)no mention of it
SunSeeker
(51,588 posts)Sanders passed the buck to Jane regarding why he hasn't produced his tax returns. Rachel really dropped the ball in not asking her about it.
George II
(67,782 posts)DemonGoddess
(4,640 posts)gagging at the faux niceness to notice what she wore
DesertRat
(27,995 posts)Cha
(297,425 posts)R B Garr
(16,964 posts)twice....". It was something like that she said a few weeks ago on MSNBC, and she went from being somewhat neutral to extreme dislike in my mind. What a lowbrow thing to say. Classless and a real insight into her pettiness.
Her comments tonight just amplified that pettiness. She sounded way, way out of her league talking about Hillary. She diminished herself.
The both of them are obviously not going to admit that Sanders, himself, invited the scrutiny on him with the horrific New York Daily News bomb interview. Hillary had nothing to do with that. Contrasting how he can't even articulate his own ideas past his podium talking points is going to get noticed.
But more of their constant victim status. It's obviously good for their collection plate.
Maru Kitteh
(28,342 posts)And they do have some taxes that need to be paid . . .
DesertFlower
(11,649 posts)Cha
(297,425 posts)being one of the worst surrogates berni has.
She was also on some show.. Oh, it was Chris Hayes where she was dissing President Obama.. something like he was so 2008. And, that's not all she's dissed him but I don't remember what else she's said. She has no class and all she does is insult. They make a damn good pair.
Actually, she and BS are late to the Revolution.. President Obama started it in 2008 and Hillary is continuing it now and through to 2017 and beyond.
Brilliant!..
"But more of their constant victim status. It's obviously good for their collection plate."
Firebrand Gary
(5,044 posts)I came down on Sander's like a truck load of bricks in the last 48 hours, which he deserved. I've got the posts and a new hide to prove it. That being said, I am a believer that spouses are off limits.
Jane did a great job! She also reiterated party unity upon the nomination no matter who wins. Our party needs more of that, I choose not to disregard it.
- Gary