Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

polly7

(20,582 posts)
Fri Feb 21, 2014, 10:11 AM Feb 2014

Violent Protests in Venezuela Fit a Pattern

By Dan Beeton

Source: Center for Economic & Policy Research

February 20, 2014

Venezuela’s latest round of violent protests appears to fit a pattern, and represents the tug-and-pull nature of the country’s divided opposition. Several times over the past 15 years since the late, former president Hugo Chávez took office in 1999, the political opposition has launched violent protests aimed at forcing the current president out of office. Most notably, such protests were a part of the April 2002 coup that temporarily deposed Chávez, and then accompanied the 2002/2003 oil strike. In February of 2004, a particularly radical sector of the opposition unleashed the “Guarimba”: violent riots by small groups who paralyzed much of the east of Caracas for several days with the declared goal of creating a state of chaos. As CEPR Co-Director Mark Weisbrot has explained, then – as now – the strategy is clear: a sector of the opposition seeks to overturn the results of democratic elections. An important difference this time of course is that Venezuela has its first post-Chávez president, and a key part of the opposition’s strategy overall has been to depict Nicolás Maduro as a pale imitation of his predecessor and a president ill-equipped to deal with the country’s problems (many of which are exaggerated in the Venezuelan private media, which is still largely opposition-owned, as well as the international media).

Following Maduro’s electoral victory in April last year (with much of the opposition crying “fraud” despite there being no reasonable doubts about the validity of the results), the opposition looked to the December municipal elections as a referendum on Maduro’s government, vowing to defeat governing party PSUV and allied candidates. The outcome, which left the pro-Maduro parties with a 10 point margin of victory, was a stunning defeat for the opposition, and this time they did not even bother claiming the elections were rigged. According to the opposition’s own pre-election analysis, support for Maduro had apparently grown over the months preceding the election. As we have pointed out, this may be due in part to the large reduction in poverty in 2012 and other economic and social gains that preceded the more recent economic problems.

Defeated at the polls, the anti-democratic faction of the opposition prepared for a new attempt at destabilizing the elected government, and promoted relatively small, but often violent student protests in early February. They then called for a massive protest on February 12, Venezuela’s Youth Day in the center of Caracas. The demonstrations have been accompanied by a social media campaign that has spread misinformation in an attempt to depict the Maduro administration as a violent dictatorship instead of a popular elected government. Images of police violence from other countries and past protests – some several years old – have been presented on social media as having occurred in recent days in Venezuela. A YouTube video that has been watched by almost 2 million viewers presents a one-sided portrayal of the situation and falsely states that the Venezuelan government controls all radio and television in the country, among other distortions. Similar disinformation occurred in April 2002 and in other past incidents in Venezuela, most notably when manipulated video footage was used to provide political justification for the coup d’etat.

While some in Washington foreign policy circles may attempt to portray the leaders of this new wave of protests as persecuted pro-democracy heroes, they in fact have histories of supporting anti-democratic and unconstitutional efforts to oust the government. Both Leopoldo López and Maria Corina Machado supported the 2002 coup; in López’s case he participated in it by supervising the arrest of then-Minister of Justice and the Interior Ramón Rodríguez Chacín, when López was mayor of Chacao. Police dragged Rodríguez Chacín out of the building where he had sought refuge into an angry mob, who physically attacked him. Corina Machado notably was present when the coup government of Pedro Carmona was sworn in, and signed the infamous “Carmona decree” dissolving the congress, the constitution and the Supreme Court. The Christian Science Monitor reported yesterday:


Full article: http://zcomm.org/znetarticle/violent-protests-in-venezuela-fit-a-pattern/
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

fasttense

(17,301 posts)
1. Thanks for posting the truth
Fri Feb 21, 2014, 10:30 AM
Feb 2014

DU seems to be getting hit by the corporate propaganda ministers and most of what I've seen here is how poor poor Lopez just can't catch a break.

The truth is he is a Harvard educated pampered member of the 1% and is well funded by our tax dollars (Obama has a line item on his budget to fund Venezuela opposition parties). US plutocrats are also funding Lopez.

I hope Venezuela doesn't turn into another Pinochet Chile.

polly7

(20,582 posts)
2. Yw, fasttense.
Fri Feb 21, 2014, 10:46 AM
Feb 2014

Venezuela will be ok! The people who've worked so hard to bring about the changes that have let so many see hope for the first time, aren't going to be put down or out by a bunch of right-winger freaks. Chavez made sure to include them in decision-making from the beginning. Those pampered elite bent on turning back time have a much larger fight on their hands than just Maduro.

Judi Lynn

(160,555 posts)
3. You bet they do! As it has been said, "we created Chavez!"
Fri Feb 21, 2014, 04:35 PM
Feb 2014

That was a comment heard as far back as the 2002 coup, and people were re-committing to their purpose, indicating that were they to lose their great President, another would rise in his place, as the majority of Venzuelans will support it, time after time, after time, from now on, now that they have lived through the filthy hell they have without conscientious leaders.

wayne_fontes

(25 posts)
5. A line item?
Fri Feb 21, 2014, 08:39 PM
Feb 2014

Where in the budget is this line item? I've never heard of it before. Can you provide a link?

Judi Lynn

(160,555 posts)
9. Thank you for assisting the mensa member in his/her search for truth.
Sat Feb 22, 2014, 10:16 PM
Feb 2014

They always they can confound and disrupt with their "quick" maneuvers.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
8. Thanks polly, portraying thugs as poor, oppressed 'protesters' is a pattern of Right Wing
Sat Feb 22, 2014, 02:06 PM
Feb 2014

oligarchs, and their DC buddies. Interesting how 'concerned' Washington is about the treatment of protesters everywhere else, considering what they did to Occupy Wall St. right here. How they ignored appeals from the UN to protect OWS protesters from the brutal assaults and illegal arrests of the so-called 'civilian' police. We are still waiting for something, a word of condemnation perhaps, of what was done to OWS right here in their own country. They have zero credibility.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Latin America»Violent Protests in Venez...