Latin America
Related: About this forumRadically Reshaping Latina/o America
Radically Reshaping Latina/o America
Latina/os are best positioned to form a broad left agendabeyond advocating immigration reformto tackle hemispheric inequality at its roots.
Ed Morales
Whats in a name? The label Latino is often used to describe a monolithic interest group or voting bloc. And while criticized as inaccurate because of Latinos diverse national, ethnic, and racial manifestations, as an organizing principal the label still conveys significant meaninga narrative of shared experiencein both Latin America and the United States. Although Mexican Americans on the West Coast may have sharp differences with Puerto Rican migrants in New York and with Cuban Americans in Miami, what Latina/os have in common, besides a shared language and parallel cultures, is a history marked by U.S. intervention. Its the result of that intervention that has for the most part driven immigration northward. While the hemispheres future will be determined by the continuously evolving political relationship between the United States and Latin America, the question is, what role will U.S. Latina/os play in that future?
In the 1960s and 1970s, the term Latino was embraced by a growing constituency of U.S.-born Latina/os who identified with the civil rights and national liberation movements of the era. They saw the term as an alternative to the Nixon administrations use of Hispanic, a European-identified term with assimilationist connotations. But over the years, the Latino activist charge has waned; largely as a result of a perception created by corporate media and consumer marketers, Latina/os are now often cast as recent arrivals, imperfect English speakers, and others from el otro lado. This contradiction is reflected by the changing nature of U.S. Latina/o politics, in which crucial concerns around immigration policy have eclipsed, at least in public perception, the other class-based concerns of working people that historically have occupied a larger role in the left Latina/o agenda.
While free-trade policies aim to diminish borders to accommodate the flow of capital, the post-9/11 obsession with national security has refocused our attention on borderswhether it involves remilitarizing the one with Mexico or reasserting the class and race barriers that enforce segregation in our cities. Just as U.S. military intervention beginning in the early-twentieth century created migration flows to the north, so too as investment capital flows south, displaced populations move across the physical border, escaping, still, political persecution or economic devastation primarily caused by U.S. economic policy or U.S. support for anti-democratic governments.
The traditional view of U.S. Latina/o politics holds that the three dominant groups that wield political power are Mexicans, much of whose country was absorbed after the U.S.-Mexico war in 1848, and Puerto Ricans and Cubans, whose countries were ceded to the United States after the Spanish-American War in 1898 (with Puerto Rico still a U.S. territory). In the twentieth century, the political and cultural power and awareness of these groups matured, staking out three distinct regions of influence. Mexican descendants, who make up almost two-thirds of the U.S. Latina/o population, are concentrated in the West and Southwest; Puerto Ricans, who are born U.S. citizens and are therefore not technically immigrants, are concentrated in the Northeast; and Cuban-Americans are concentrated in South Florida.
More:
https://nacla.org/article/radically-reshaping-latinao-america