Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

eridani

(51,907 posts)
Mon Aug 27, 2012, 03:03 AM Aug 2012

"Financial services professionals may need to engage in illegal or unethical conduct to succeed"

[http://www.nationofchange.org/unrepentant-and-unreformed-bankers-134599128

A June survey of 500 senior financial services executives in the United States and Britain turned up stunning results. Some 24 percent said that they believed that financial services professionals may need to engage in illegal or unethical conduct to succeed, 26 percent said that they had observed or had firsthand knowledge of wrongdoing in the workplace, and 16 percent said they would engage in insider trading if they could get away with it.

That too much of Wall Street remains unchanged is not surprising. Simply stated, the banks and their leaders have paid no real economic, legal or political price for their wrongdoing and thus have not felt compelled to change.

<snip>

On the legal front, enforcement has been woefully inadequate. Federal criminal financial fraud prosecutions have fallen to a two-decade low. Violations are settled for pennies on the dollar - the mere cost of doing business, with no admission of wrongdoing and with the bill invariably picked up by insurers or shareholders. (When it's shareholders, that's not someone else far away, that's your 401(k), pension fund or mutual fund.)

When Goldman Sachs was charged with failing to set policies to prevent insider trading, it was fined $22 million, an amount the bank collects in about seven hours of trading. Goldman's record $550 million penalty for securities fraud in 2010 amounted to less than 2 percent of that year's revenue.

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"Financial services professionals may need to engage in illegal or unethical conduct to succeed" (Original Post) eridani Aug 2012 OP
Yet they're guilty of no crimes? Scuba Aug 2012 #1
Back in the early 00s, my dad got a new financial planner Warpy Aug 2012 #2
This is why we don't need the financial "services" industry. mbperrin Aug 2012 #3

Warpy

(111,261 posts)
2. Back in the early 00s, my dad got a new financial planner
Mon Aug 27, 2012, 12:43 PM
Aug 2012

and took me to meet the guy because he wanted my read on him. My snap impression was that he was OK, that he wasn't any sleazier than he had to be to keep his job.

It turned out to be correct. The worst thing he did was offer sucker bait in the company's latest pump and dump. My dad couldn't tell when he was feeling ethically challenged but I can.

These guys really do have to skirt the letter of the law to "produce" enough to keep their jobs and the farther away they are from providing services directly to stockholders, the worse it gets.

mbperrin

(7,672 posts)
3. This is why we don't need the financial "services" industry.
Mon Aug 27, 2012, 04:43 PM
Aug 2012

Country's had about the service it can stand.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Economy»"Financial services ...