Pair of NLRB Cases Could Land Temps, Low-Wage Workers the Protections They’ve Long Desired

[Omaha Steve]

X post in Socialist-Progressive

http://wepartypatriots.com/wp/2014/07/17/pair-of-nlrb-cases-could-redefine-employer-and-employee-temp-workers-may-earn-long-desired-protections/




Fast food protests have helped shape the national narrative about low-wage employment


Two cases currently before the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) will determine what it officially means to be an employer, and the ramifications for management in industries ranging from fast food to waste collection could be serious.

Given the complicated nature of modern American labor the two decisions seek to determine who employs whom and therefore who can enter into collective bargaining agreements. The cases aim to undress the chain of command hidden by layers of temporary staffing and franchising laws many companies exploit to lower labor costs.

The first case is a consolidated case that will determine the future of fast food franchises. At question is whether McDonalds qualifies as a ‘joint employer’ along with the franchise owners. It is one of the byproducts of a growing campaign to raise the minimum wage to $15 which has swept the nation.

The Washington Post Wonkblog explains that former McDonald’s executive Richard Adams argues that the company is a “joint employer.” Adams, now a consultant, says McDonald’s can leverage out franchisees who disagree:

FULL story at link.

[Sherman A1]

1. K&R