Utah, trade groups ask Supreme Court to review oil rail line

[mahatmakanejeeves]

Last edited Wed Apr 10, 2024, 02:57 PM - Edit history (2)

WHAT WE'RE READING
The morning read for Wednesday, April 10

By Ellena Erskine
on Apr 10, 2024 at 10:18 am

Each weekday, we select a short list of news articles, commentary, and other noteworthy links related to the Supreme Court. Here’s the Wednesday morning read:

• Some Jan. 6 rioters win early release, even before key Supreme Court ruling (Spencer S. Hsu, The Washington Post)
• Utah, trade groups ask Supreme Court to review oil rail line (Niina H. Fara, E&E News)

{snip}

Here's an article from someone who has been covering the plans for this rail line for a long time.

Utah oil-train backers petition U.S. Supreme Court to restore railway’s approval

Uinta Basin Railway would dramatically increase hazardous materials shipments through Colorado

BY: DAVID O. WILLIAMS - MARCH 13, 2024 2:37 PM



Freight trains sit idle in railyards in Grand Junction on May 16, 2023. (Chase Woodruff/Colorado Newsline)

The proponents of a planned short-line Utah railroad that would dramatically increase oil-train traffic through Colorado last week filed a petition with the U.S. Supreme Court seeking a review of litigation that derailed the project late last year.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit in August overturned the federal approval of the 88-mile Uinta Basin Railway, which would connect the oil fields of northeastern Utah to the nation’s main rail network, ruling regulatory agencies didn’t properly scrutinize the potential downstream environmental impacts. In November, the court rejected a petition for rehearing, and in January the U.S. Forest Service withdrew its approval for the segment of line crossing the agency’s land.

Now the Seven County Infrastructure Coalition, formed by seven oil-rich counties in the area to fund and facilitate the rail project, is seeking more state money to take its case all the way to the Supreme Court. ... In its March 4 filing, the infrastructure coalition claims the D.C. appeals court decision took too broad a view of the National Environmental Policy Act review required of the rail project, and that the federal regulatory agencies did not have to consider the impacts to Colorado or the Gulf Coast communities where the oil would be refined.

At stake is whether federal regulatory agencies must consider downstream impacts such as potential oil spills, wildfires and carbon emissions contributing to global warming. The coalition cites a 2004 case, Department of Transportation v. Public Citizen, which found an agency’s limited authority might not require it to consider more far-reaching impacts under NEPA.

{snip}

David O. Williams is an award-winning freelance journalist based in EagleVail, Colorado. His work has appeared in more than 75 publications around the world and he owns and operates RealVail.com.

Tue Aug 29, 2023: After Court Rejects Approval, What's Next For Uinta Basin Railway?

Sun Jul 30, 2023: Moffat Tunnel lease could become part of fight over Uinta Basin Railway

[riversedge]

1. Supporters of the Uinta Basin Railway said a lower court overstepped when it ordered further environmental review of the

.......Utah, trade groups ask Supreme Court to review oil rail line


Supporters of the Uinta Basin Railway said a lower court overstepped when it ordered further environmental review of the planned line.
https://www.eenews.net/articles/utah-trade-groups-ask-supreme-court-to-review-oil-rail-line/

[CoopersDad]

2. Further NEPA review is the right thing to do here, and with other projects.

We are one planet, the activities of moving fossil fuels through one state to be burned anywhere in the world need to be included in the environmental review process.

The US needs to just stop being a fossil fuel exporter and find more benign ways to generate jobs and revenue.