Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
Fri Nov 9, 2012, 12:23 PM Nov 2012

Worst Case Climate Projections Likely: Study

http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2012/11/09


“When examining the impact of future increases in heat-trapping gases, we find that the simulations with the best fidelity come from models that produce more warming,” says study co-author Kevin Trenberth. (photo: Horizon2035 via flickr)

The worst case projections for global warming may be the most likely, according to an analysis from scientists at the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR).


The NASA-funded research by NCAR scientists John Fasullo and Kevin Trenberth was published Thursday in the journal Science.

Fasullo and Trenberth analyzed how 16 leading climate models reproduce observed relative humidity, a major influence on global temperatures, focusing on the subtropics.


11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Worst Case Climate Projections Likely: Study (Original Post) xchrom Nov 2012 OP
Link doesn't. This one is better... immoderate Nov 2012 #1
Link deleted. AverageJoe90 Nov 2012 #6
That they cite Roy Spencer sets off alarms. immoderate Nov 2012 #9
Thanks for the heads-up, then. AverageJoe90 Nov 2012 #10
Is that the link you meant to use ? dipsydoodle Nov 2012 #2
that'll teach me to have more than 1 window open at a time. xchrom Nov 2012 #3
Done that myself before dipsydoodle Nov 2012 #5
sure. spanish unemployment is the root of all modern woes. nt xchrom Nov 2012 #4
I would love to read the study. joshcryer Nov 2012 #7
Supplimentary materials here: joshcryer Nov 2012 #8
Fasullo was kind enough to send me the paper. joshcryer Nov 2012 #11
 

AverageJoe90

(10,745 posts)
6. Link deleted.
Fri Nov 9, 2012, 11:43 PM
Nov 2012

(Immoderate pointed out that the scientists in the study cited known anti-AGW 'skeptic' Roy Spencer, a fact that I had unintentionally overlooked when first browsing the document. In the interest of maintaining intellectual honesty, I've decided to eliminate the link.)

 

immoderate

(20,885 posts)
9. That they cite Roy Spencer sets off alarms.
Sat Nov 10, 2012, 11:06 AM
Nov 2012

Spencer is a major denier. He is funded by Exxon, Heartland Institute, Marshall Institute, Cornwall Alliance for the Stewardship of Creation, and other think tanks that deny global warming.

I didn't disassemble their thesis, but clouds provide both a negative and positive feedback for warming. In any case this information is suspect.

Here's an interesting source, though a bit dated.
http://www.exxonsecrets.org/maps.php

Also check out books, presentations by Naomi Oreskes who has investigated those think tanks.



--imm

joshcryer

(62,276 posts)
7. I would love to read the study.
Sat Nov 10, 2012, 02:33 AM
Nov 2012

If anyone wants to hit me up joshcryer@gmail.com

edit: looks like it'll be available here sometime soon: http://www.cgd.ucar.edu/cas/Staff/Fasullo/index.html

joshcryer

(62,276 posts)
11. Fasullo was kind enough to send me the paper.
Mon Nov 19, 2012, 05:47 AM
Nov 2012


This helps illustrate what they expect to happen. Equatorial regions will get hotter and brighter, with less clouds. There won't be an appreciable increase in clouds in higher latitudes.
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Worst Case Climate Projec...