Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumThese Scary Maps Explain What Sea Level Rise Will Mean in Boston
In this environment, The Boston Harbor Association is somewhat fortuitously releasing today a major scientific report, long in the works, on what coming sea-level rise could mean for the city. And if Sandy had any silver living, says Swett, Bostons Environment and Energy Chief, it is that residents are now as ready as ever to listen.
"I have yet to see a scientific report on sea level rise or storm surge that makes me less concerned," Swett says of his own reaction to the dramatic picture portrayed in the new report, Preparing for the Rising Tide. "It seems like the more we know, the more onus and important pressure there is on taking action."
The reports authors modeled two scenarios for the city: one in which flood levels rise to 5 feet above the average high tide today, and one in which flood waters rise 7½ feet above current high tide. The first scenario corresponds to the equivalent of a 100-year storm surge today (meaning the kind of storm that has a 1 percent likelihood of happening this year). This map from the report illustrates exactly what this would look like in the city:
On an individual building-by-building basis, the report suggests that every property in those flood zones will need to begin to think about adaptations today. The scale of such an undertaking seems overwhelming, but local businesses that have previewed the report no longer sound as if they're shirking the challenge. "None of them are saying 'oh this is never going to happen, forget it, you environmentalists are just overreacting,'" Li says. "But rather how much time do we have?'
http://www.theatlanticcities.com/neighborhoods/2013/02/these-scary-maps-explain-what-sea-level-rise-will-mean-boston/4591/#
chelsea0011
(10,115 posts)Demeter
(85,373 posts)1) no wonder I was always getting lost
2) what an opportunity for
a) urban renewal
b)swimming lessons
c) island retreats
CRH
(1,553 posts)can be effective for long and be worth the huge investment, they must be assuming a 2*C rise in global mean temperatures is still realistic. That the World Bank, Price Waterhouse Coopers, UNEP, and presentations at the World Economic Forum suggest we should be now be trying to contain the damage of a 4*C rise means Greenland and much of West Antarctica will be contributing to the rises centuries earlier than predicted.
Once again this study appears to obsolete upon completion. Everyone is trying to protect lower real estate from flooding rather than preparing new infrastructure at higher elevations. I think there will be much wasted resource if planners refuse to accept realistic scenarios for future sea levels.
limpyhobbler
(8,244 posts)Oh well they had a good run!