Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

wtmusic

(39,166 posts)
Thu May 16, 2013, 05:31 PM May 2013

Solar Power's Toxic Footprint



"According to figures released by the California Department of Toxic Substances Control DTSC, solar manufacturers in the state produced over 46 million pounds of hazardous waste between 2007 and 2011. 1.4 million pounds of that waste, which included polluted water and heavy metals such as cadmium, was shipped out of state -- meaning that calculations of solar's climate benefit must account for fuel used to ship that hazardous waste.

San Jose State Environmental Studies professor Dustin Mulvaney told the Associated Press' Jason Dearen that the fuel used to transport hazardous waste for the manufacture of a typical solar panel is equivalent to the carbon emissions avoided by about two or three months' panel production.

Some of the hazardous waste production stems from younger companies failure to implement recycling programs, reports Dearen. The solar technology used also makes a difference: waste cadmium is produced during the manufacture of cadmium telluride thin-film solar panels, and not so much with other types of photovoltaic cells."

http://www.kcet.org/news/rewire/solar/photovoltaic-pv/solar-powers-toxic-footprint.html
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Solar Power's Toxic Footprint (Original Post) wtmusic May 2013 OP
kr bloomington-lib May 2013 #1
1) Recycling the waste into more panels saves the company money kristopher May 2013 #2
Who knew NickB79 May 2013 #3
CA DTSC wrote the article and posted it on DU? kristopher May 2013 #4
Ah! So what you're saying is... FBaggins May 2013 #5

kristopher

(29,798 posts)
2. 1) Recycling the waste into more panels saves the company money
Thu May 16, 2013, 08:51 PM
May 2013

2) "Not so much from other types of solar cells"

AntiRenewable propaganda courtesy of the nuclear industry.

NickB79

(19,276 posts)
3. Who knew
Thu May 16, 2013, 09:09 PM
May 2013

That the California Department of Toxic Substances Control DTSC was a branch of the nuclear industry

Thank God those 46 million pounds of hazardous waste don't really exist then after all.......

kristopher

(29,798 posts)
4. CA DTSC wrote the article and posted it on DU?
Thu May 16, 2013, 09:18 PM
May 2013

Did you hear that Iraq has WMD. It's true, a certain exPresident said so.

FBaggins

(26,775 posts)
5. Ah! So what you're saying is...
Fri May 17, 2013, 08:40 AM
May 2013

... a fact can be true and come from a reliable source...

... but then cease too be true and instead become propaganda if it's posted on DU by someone you disagree with.

An incredibly... hmm... "convenient" position.

"kristopher - taking confirmation bias to new levels every day" should be your new slogan. I love the one from yesterday where you confidently proclaim that 90% of the people agree with you. I get the feeling that you actually believe that.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Solar Power's Toxic Footp...