Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumNorway Divests From 114 Companies Worldwide Involved In Gold, Tar Sands, Coal
In its first-ever report on responsible investing, Norway's pension fund announced last week that it has divested from 114 companies in the past three years due to concerns over global warming, deforestation, and sustainability as well as long-term financial viability. Worth a staggering $861 billion, Norway's Government Pension Fund Global (GPFG) is the world's largest sovereign wealth fund. We have gradually increased the scope of risk-based divestments, both geographically and thematically, said Yngve Slyngstad, CEO of Norges Bank Investment Management. Also known as the Oil Fund, given most of its wealth comes from the petroleum sector, the GPFG is so massive that it owns arounds 1.3 percent of the world's listed shares.
Although it has not released the names of all the companies, the GPFG has dropped 43 corporations due to deforestation risks. More than half of these companies were in the palm oil industry, but they also included Indonesian coal mining companies, paper producers, and gold miners.
It dropped 22 companies due to unacceptably high greenhouse gas emissionsincluding coal, tar sands, and cement companies. The GFPG still heavily invests in many fossil fuel companies, but decides on divestment on a case-by-case basis. The GFPG also expelled 35 companies due to water management risks, including tar sands companies. Finally, 14 companies were expelled for unnamed reasons. The GPFG already excludes any companies involved in tobacco, nuclear weapons, and land mines.
"We like to use the word active not activist, but it does mean that we are spending more time and having more people looking into these issues," Slyngstad told the press. "This can lead to adjustments to the portfolio and decisions to divest from specific securities."
EDIT
http://news.mongabay.com/2015/0209-hance-norway-fund-divestment.html
djean111
(14,255 posts)fund.
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)companies. Refuse hem them import licenses.
Nihil
(13,508 posts)Yes, it is a start (not a finish) but it is showing a level of social responsibility
that shames the self-appointed "leaders" of rich nations.
OnlinePoker
(5,719 posts)Probably not too many.
Nihil
(13,508 posts)> The GFPG also expelled 35 companies due to water management risks, including tar sands companies.
> Finally, 14 companies were expelled for unnamed reasons.
> The GFPG still heavily invests in many fossil fuel companies, but decides on divestment on a case-by-case basis.
> Also known as the Oil Fund, given most of its wealth comes from the petroleum sector,
> the GPFG is so massive that it owns arounds 1.3 percent of the world's listed shares.
i.e., given that it relies on the petroleum sector, the only Norwegian oil companies that they would divest from
are those who have created water management risks, "unacceptably high" greenhouse gas emissions (no qualification
for what that level is) or whatever the "unnamed reasons" are.
It is still an excellent move.