Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hatrack

(59,587 posts)
Tue Feb 10, 2015, 08:39 AM Feb 2015

Norway Divests From 114 Companies Worldwide Involved In Gold, Tar Sands, Coal

In its first-ever report on responsible investing, Norway's pension fund announced last week that it has divested from 114 companies in the past three years due to concerns over global warming, deforestation, and sustainability as well as long-term financial viability. Worth a staggering $861 billion, Norway's Government Pension Fund Global (GPFG) is the world's largest sovereign wealth fund. “We have gradually increased the scope of risk-based divestments, both geographically and thematically,” said Yngve Slyngstad, CEO of Norges Bank Investment Management. Also known as the Oil Fund, given most of its wealth comes from the petroleum sector, the GPFG is so massive that it owns arounds 1.3 percent of the world's listed shares.

Although it has not released the names of all the companies, the GPFG has dropped 43 corporations due to deforestation risks. More than half of these companies were in the palm oil industry, but they also included Indonesian coal mining companies, paper producers, and gold miners.

It dropped 22 companies due to unacceptably high greenhouse gas emissions—including coal, tar sands, and cement companies. The GFPG still heavily invests in many fossil fuel companies, but decides on divestment on a case-by-case basis. The GFPG also expelled 35 companies due to water management risks, including tar sands companies. Finally, 14 companies were expelled for unnamed reasons. The GPFG already excludes any companies involved in tobacco, nuclear weapons, and land mines.

"We like to use the word active not activist, but it does mean that we are spending more time and having more people looking into these issues," Slyngstad told the press. "This can lead to adjustments to the portfolio and decisions to divest from specific securities."

EDIT

http://news.mongabay.com/2015/0209-hance-norway-fund-divestment.html

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Norway Divests From 114 Companies Worldwide Involved In Gold, Tar Sands, Coal (Original Post) hatrack Feb 2015 OP
And somewhere, a sweaty Mitt is trying to figure out how to get his hands on that pension djean111 Feb 2015 #1
The next step should be their government formally anouncing they will not engage in trade with those Agnosticsherbet Feb 2015 #2
Excellent news. Nihil Feb 2015 #3
And how many Norwegian oil companies are they divesting? OnlinePoker Feb 2015 #4
The OP pretty well explains that ... Nihil Feb 2015 #5

Agnosticsherbet

(11,619 posts)
2. The next step should be their government formally anouncing they will not engage in trade with those
Tue Feb 10, 2015, 01:02 PM
Feb 2015

companies. Refuse hem them import licenses.

 

Nihil

(13,508 posts)
3. Excellent news.
Wed Feb 11, 2015, 05:56 AM
Feb 2015

Yes, it is a start (not a finish) but it is showing a level of social responsibility
that shames the self-appointed "leaders" of rich nations.

 

Nihil

(13,508 posts)
5. The OP pretty well explains that ...
Thu Feb 12, 2015, 04:58 AM
Feb 2015

> The GFPG also expelled 35 companies due to water management risks, including tar sands companies.
> Finally, 14 companies were expelled for unnamed reasons.

> The GFPG still heavily invests in many fossil fuel companies, but decides on divestment on a case-by-case basis.

> Also known as the Oil Fund, given most of its wealth comes from the petroleum sector,
> the GPFG is so massive that it owns arounds 1.3 percent of the world's listed shares.

i.e., given that it relies on the petroleum sector, the only Norwegian oil companies that they would divest from
are those who have created water management risks, "unacceptably high" greenhouse gas emissions (no qualification
for what that level is) or whatever the "unnamed reasons" are.

It is still an excellent move.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Norway Divests From 114 C...