Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
PA TV teaches kids: All of Israel will be replaced by "Palestine" (Original Post) Mosby May 2014 OP
And Israeli policy says the opposite TexasProgresive May 2014 #1
Ah yes, Palwatch. The propagandist hate vehicle of discredited settler / doosh Itimar Marcus. R. Daneel Olivaw May 2014 #2

TexasProgresive

(12,157 posts)
1. And Israeli policy says the opposite
Sun May 25, 2014, 10:33 PM
May 2014

There ain't no such thing as Palestine.
The continued incursion of Israeli settlements in Palestinian land is by design anti-peace that with the illegal occupation.

 

R. Daneel Olivaw

(12,606 posts)
2. Ah yes, Palwatch. The propagandist hate vehicle of discredited settler / doosh Itimar Marcus.
Sun May 25, 2014, 10:58 PM
May 2014
http://972mag.com/judge-dismisses-credibility-of-palestinian-media-watch-testimony/78900/
Judge dismisses credibility of Palestinian Media Watch testimony

An Israeli district court judge metes out scathing criticism of Palestinian Media Watch director Itamar Marcus’s expert witness testimony on incitement in Palestinian media, in a civil case against the PA and its leaders. Marcus’s testimony, Judge Dalia Gano wrote, was incomplete, biased and unworthy of the title “expert witness testimony.”

---

http://eng.haokets.org/2014/02/22/palestinian-incitement-genuine-problem-or-right-wing-dream/

On August 28, Tel Aviv District Court Judge Dalia Ganot issued an unprecedented ruling completely rejecting Marcus’s assessment that PA incitement led to the murder of Gilad Zar. From her ruling:

This question was not examined by the expert Marcus, who does not distinguish between his assessment and news media content, or expression of opinion, or broadcasts on social issues…and in any case [he] did not attempt to estimate the time frame of issued remarks of incitement proportionate to total broadcast times, and therefore, the expert Be’er’s [the author] statement is correct in its clarity:

The matter of the assessment submitted by the plaintiffs in the name of Mr. Itamar Marcus, is an attempt to interpret and attach meaning to selected content sampled randomly from the entire discourse occurring in the Palestinian Authority during the clashes and the Second Intifada…taking into account the absence of any accepted valid testing method, that could serve as a foundation for some sort of suit, his assessment is [hereby] rejected…



Frankly, I'm not surprised that you would hang your hat with a fu@king illegal settler AKA propagandist Dbag like Itimar Marcus.

But thanks for the clarity. This would be like promoting Bill O'Reilly or Glen Beck in America.

Carry on...

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Israel/Palestine»PA TV teaches kids: All o...