Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Fearless

(18,421 posts)
Wed Feb 6, 2013, 03:52 PM Feb 2013

Ex-Gay Therapist's Children's Book, Submitted To Supreme Court To Oppose Gay Marriage

A children's book that implies being gay is a reversible condition caused by childhood sexual abuse has been submitted to the Supreme Court as part of an amicus brief in support of California's same-sex marriage ban.

The children's book submitted by Parents and Friends of Ex-Gays & Gays (PFOX), titled "Alfie's Home," is written by Richard Cohen, a self-professed sexual reorientation specialist who tours the country talking about his therapy -- something he says can help gay and lesbians "change their orientation."

PFOX is a group that argues that homosexuality can be "cured" through therapy or self-determination, the Washington Post notes.

In the brief, PFOX addresses the question of whether or not the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment prohibits the state of California from defining marriage as the union of a man and a woman. PFOX argues that gays and lesbians can not be part of a "protected class" because being gay is a choice...

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/02/05/alfies-home-ex-gay-therapist-supreme-court-gay-marriage_n_2624496.html?utm_hp_ref=gay-voices

---------------------------

WHAT?!?

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Ex-Gay Therapist's Children's Book, Submitted To Supreme Court To Oppose Gay Marriage (Original Post) Fearless Feb 2013 OP
Hmmm. I wonder if they plan on using their illogic... DreamGypsy Feb 2013 #1
But religion is a choice dbackjon Feb 2013 #2
... William769 Feb 2013 #3
Good. Orangepeel Feb 2013 #4

DreamGypsy

(2,252 posts)
1. Hmmm. I wonder if they plan on using their illogic...
Wed Feb 6, 2013, 04:11 PM
Feb 2013

...and anti-science based thinking to make a similar argument about religious affiliation?

uh, maybe not.

We need to get another progressive justice, or better yet 2 or 3 justices, on the Court before any of this garbage slips through.

 

dbackjon

(6,578 posts)
2. But religion is a choice
Wed Feb 6, 2013, 05:32 PM
Feb 2013

Are they arguing that we should be able to discriminate based on religion?


Assholes

Orangepeel

(13,933 posts)
4. Good.
Thu Feb 7, 2013, 09:38 AM
Feb 2013

I don't pretend to be an expert on SCOTUS, but based on what I've read, Kennedy sometimes votes sensibly on issues that don't involve favoring the rich.

I hope he gets really pissed off by all the looney bullshit they submit.

Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»LGBT»Ex-Gay Therapist's Childr...