Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MNBrewer

(8,462 posts)
Wed Aug 21, 2013, 03:10 PM Aug 2013

GLAAD Study: Gays & Lesbians Still at the Back of Hollywood's Movie Bus

http://movies.yahoo.com/news/glaad-study-gays-lesbians-still-back-hollywoods-movie-170902372.html

When it comes to movies, gays and lesbians are still riding in the back of the bus.

Shows like "Glee" and "Will & Grace" have helped television audiences grow more comfortable with homosexuality in recent years, and great strides have taken place in the legal system, particularly in the area of marriage equality.

The picture on the big screen is grimmer. Of the 101 films released by the six leading studios in Hollywood last year, only 14 contained LGBT characters, a new study by media monitoring group GLAAD found.

And there's definitely some genre bias. Comedies proved to be the most inclusive genre when it comes to LGBT representation. Nine of the 24 comedies released by the six studios featured LGBT characters, while only three of the 34 action or science-fiction films included LGBT characters and only one out of the 21 dramas that hit screens had any LGBT representation.

*Comedies love us, because we're funny.* *sigh*
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
GLAAD Study: Gays & Lesbians Still at the Back of Hollywood's Movie Bus (Original Post) MNBrewer Aug 2013 OP
We will continue to be underused and underrated until people grow up. Behind the Aegis Aug 2013 #1
Case and point: The "controversy" stemming from the latest James Bond film. Fearless Aug 2013 #3
The average movie-goer is a 16 year-old boy... joeybee12 Aug 2013 #2
Average? I think not MNBrewer Aug 2013 #5
Most likely then...they made up the vast majority of movie-goers...nt joeybee12 Aug 2013 #6
What can I say? William769 Aug 2013 #4

Behind the Aegis

(53,959 posts)
1. We will continue to be underused and underrated until people grow up.
Wed Aug 21, 2013, 03:20 PM
Aug 2013

You want to see people really freak out? Try suggesting a fictional character's sexual orientation be changed to gay/bisexual and stand back! Think I am kidding?

Dr. Who and Spiderman

Oh noes! Not "teh gay!"

Fearless

(18,421 posts)
3. Case and point: The "controversy" stemming from the latest James Bond film.
Wed Aug 21, 2013, 05:10 PM
Aug 2013

Because of this:




----------------------

No joke though, people cheered loudly when I saw it in theaters. It was poetic, albeit tame and very corny.
 

joeybee12

(56,177 posts)
2. The average movie-goer is a 16 year-old boy...
Wed Aug 21, 2013, 04:38 PM
Aug 2013

Hence the lack of gay characters, because they're insecure, and also is the reason for the plethora of really shitty movies, because they make movies by 16 year-olds, for 16-year-olds...actually, most movie execs are at about a 14-year-old sophistication level.

Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»LGBT»GLAAD Study: Gays & Lesbi...