Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Eugene

(61,846 posts)
Thu Feb 23, 2017, 08:33 PM Feb 2017

Arkansas Supreme Court blocks local LGBT nondiscrimination measures

Source: Reuters

U.S. | Thu Feb 23, 2017 | 4:06pm EST

Arkansas Supreme Court blocks local LGBT nondiscrimination measures

By Steve Barnes | LITTLE ROCK, ARK.

The Arkansas Supreme Court ruled on Thursday that state law barred local governments from enacting ordinances banning discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity, but justices did not address the law's constitutionality.

The unanimous decision voided anti-discrimination protections passed in 2015 in Fayetteville, a liberal city that is home to the state’s flagship university, as well as similar ordinances adopted by other local governments in the politically conservative state.

State Attorney General Leslie Rutledge, a Republican, had appealed a lower court ruling upholding the Fayetteville ordinance, which prohibited discrimination against gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender people in employment, hiring and other aspects of commerce.

Rutledge cited an Arkansas law forbidding cities and counties from extending nondiscrimination protections beyond those classes identified at the state level.

[font size=1]-snip-[/font]


Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/us-arkansas-lgbt-idUSKBN1622IB
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Arkansas Supreme Court blocks local LGBT nondiscrimination measures (Original Post) Eugene Feb 2017 OP
@#$!$ f...k. sinkingfeeling Feb 2017 #1
Local control is fine with cons until local control conflicts with deep set religious prejudices. Fred Sanders Feb 2017 #2
Of course they wouldn't address the constitutionality of these laws. Initech Feb 2017 #3

Initech

(100,056 posts)
3. Of course they wouldn't address the constitutionality of these laws.
Fri Feb 24, 2017, 06:13 PM
Feb 2017

Because are, um, fucking unconstitutional to begin with!

Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»LGBT»Arkansas Supreme Court bl...