Gun Control & RKBA
Related: About this forumStephen King: why I want assault weapons banned
"I have nothing against gun owners, sport shooters, or hunters, but semi-automatic weapons have only two purposes. One is so that owners can take them to the shooting range once in awhile, yell yeehaw and get all horny at the rapid fire and the burning vapour spurting from the end of the barrel. Their other use their only other use is to kill people.
In the wake of the Sandy Hook shootings, gun advocates have to ask themselves if their zeal to protect even the outer limits of gun ownership has anything to do with preserving the Second Amendment as a whole, or if it's just a stubborn desire to hold on to what they have, and to hell with the collateral damage."
http://en.avaaz.org/1319/stephen-king-gun-control-ban-assault-weapons
Common Sense Party
(14,139 posts)Horny? What an idiot.
Remmah2
(3,291 posts)Animal Chin
(175 posts)But his three handguns are not?
Statistically, it's almost certainly the opposite...guns like the ones King owns are much deadlier than semi-automatic rifles he wants to see banned.
The elimination of handguns (assuming a ban worked 100%) instead of semi-automatic rifles would reduce the gun death rate in the U.S. to a fraction of what it is today and bring it in line with other developed countries.
The elimination of semi-automatic rifles (again, assuming a ban worked 100%) instead of handguns would have no discernible impact on the gun death rate in the U.S.
flamin lib
(14,559 posts)Ban all semi-auto guns. Long, short or in between. If ya' can't kill somebody with 6 shots from a revolver ya' got no business with a gun anyway.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)He might as well have said 'the Ford, or the pickup'. 'Bushmaster' isn't any one gun, they make a variety of firearms.
It doesn't help the whole credibility thing along, you know.
Dr_Scholl
(212 posts)I used to like Stephen King, but not anymore.
slackmaster
(60,567 posts)Fact-challenged.