Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
Related: About this forumGun nuts' fantasies vs. real world tragedies
You remember that serious conversation we were going to have about guns? Here's how serious it has turned out to be.
Recently, President Barack Obama described himself in an interview with The New Republic as an avid skeet shooter. Conservatives scoffed at the claim, whereupon the White House whipped out photographic proof.
It was a meaningless exchange, except insofar as it suggests the White House implicitly accepts the dubious formulation, held by some gun advocates, that if one has no personal experience with guns, one cannot speak about guns. By extension of that logic, Rick Santorum can never say another word about abortion. But of course, he will because the logic is illogical.
Not that that was the most unserious moment in this supposedly serious conversation. No, that came last week when Wayne LaPierre of the National Rifle Association testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee that we must avoid new gun restrictions because guns are a citizen's protection in the event the federal government decides to enslave us.
http://www.mercurynews.com/opinion/ci_22531561/leonard-pitts-jr-gun-nuts-fantasies-vs-real
Recently, President Barack Obama described himself in an interview with The New Republic as an avid skeet shooter. Conservatives scoffed at the claim, whereupon the White House whipped out photographic proof.
It was a meaningless exchange, except insofar as it suggests the White House implicitly accepts the dubious formulation, held by some gun advocates, that if one has no personal experience with guns, one cannot speak about guns. By extension of that logic, Rick Santorum can never say another word about abortion. But of course, he will because the logic is illogical.
Not that that was the most unserious moment in this supposedly serious conversation. No, that came last week when Wayne LaPierre of the National Rifle Association testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee that we must avoid new gun restrictions because guns are a citizen's protection in the event the federal government decides to enslave us.
http://www.mercurynews.com/opinion/ci_22531561/leonard-pitts-jr-gun-nuts-fantasies-vs-real
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
8 replies, 1519 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
8 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Gun nuts' fantasies vs. real world tragedies (Original Post)
SecularMotion
Feb 2013
OP
"You remember that serious conversation we were going to have about guns?"
holdencaufield
Feb 2013
#6
iiibbb
(1,448 posts)1. Yes, my experience with assault and other crimes
are figments of my imagination.
Is it Buddhist doctrine to invalidate other people's life experiences?
Common Sense Party
(14,139 posts)3. Life is suffering. That's a Buddhist tenet.
People should suffer more because they must not be allowed the means to defend themselves...maybe that's a more modern interpretation of the tenet.
iiibbb
(1,448 posts)4. Then it's your burden to suffer the fact that I'm armed.
Common Sense Party
(14,139 posts)5. Not me, the OP. I was channeling SecMo's nonsense.
I could give a crap if you're armed. I'm around armed people every day.
iiibbb
(1,448 posts)8. Oh... sorry...
Blame the mobile version of the website.
kudzu22
(1,273 posts)2. The serious conversation was over
the moment DiFi trotted out her reheated AWB.
holdencaufield
(2,927 posts)6. "You remember that serious conversation we were going to have about guns?"
You're asking for a serious conversation with people who you label as "nuts"?
Condescend much?
Callisto32
(2,997 posts)7. Damn straight.
He's such an avid skeet shooter, he doesn't even bother putting a choke tube in the second barrel.
He's THAT GOOD.