Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

unhappycamper

(60,364 posts)
Sat Nov 16, 2013, 11:31 AM Nov 2013

Not So Fast, Senator Schumer: Army Responds On Radio Competition

http://breakingdefense.com/2013/11/not-so-fast-senator-schumer-army-responds-on-radio-competition/



Not So Fast, Senator Schumer: Army Responds On Radio Competition
By Sydney J. Freedberg Jr.
on November 15, 2013 at 4:20 PM

The battle to build the Army’s portable radios has seen more than its share of skullduggery over the last two years. A 2-star general rebuked a contractor in public. Established vendors General Dynamics and Rockwell Collins lobbied Congress to keep potential competitors out. Rochester, NY-based Harris, the up and coming upstart, throws sharp elbows in every direction. If I were an Army acquisition official, I’d have a headache by now — and it would have gotten a lot worse after New York Sen. Chuck Schumer’s announcement late Wednesday night:

“Today, U.S. Senator Charles E. Schumer announced that, after his push, the Department of Defense has reversed course and will now allow companies across the country, including Rochester’s Harris RF, to compete for 5-year multi-million dollar military radio contracts,” the Senator’s press office blared. “Prior to this decision, the army was pursuing a single-vendor process that shut out competition.”

Not so far, Senator Schumer. The Army formally began setting up competition for these contracts last fall: That’s 12 months before Schumer made the call to Sec. Chuck Hagel his press release is boasting about. (Admittedly, Schumer was already pushing pro-competition legislation last summer, but it didn’t become law). This fall, while a new strategy is in the works to make the process more competitive, it’s not happening particularly because of Schumer, who’s not on either of the defense committees and isn’t a major player on Pentagon policy.

~snip~

In fact, much of lobbying skullduggery consisted of attempts to redefine those requirements in a way that only the incumbents could effectively compete — but those attempts all failed.
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»National Security & Defense»Not So Fast, Senator Schu...