Newsweek: Toxic cosmetics marketed to black women

[pnwmom]

http://www.newsweek.com/2017/03/03/toxic-chemicals-cosmetics-hair-products-aimed-african-americans-559710.html

Deborah Cutkelvin, a hairstylist in Brooklyn, always keeps the contact information for her dermatologist on-hand. She does it for her clients—over the years, she’s seen more than her share of distraught women complain of hair loss, as well as scalps that need medical attention rather than a touch-up. The doctor often treats her clients for alopecia that’s a result of lifetimes of abuse—braiding, ironing and relaxing hair with gallons of lotions and creams that contain more chemicals than a plumber might use in a month of unclogging drains.

Cutkelvin’s business, Seymonnia’s Hair Salon, is one of thousands in Brooklyn that cater to the specific needs and preferences of black women. Because her salon has many local competitors, she tends to stick with products that produce the results her clients expect when they pay $50 to have their hair relaxed. These products contain lye, a chemical that seems to magically undo the curl of hair. It’s also a highly effective agent for cleaning the crud out of ovens, unclogging drains and dissolving animal carcasses, and it’s even used at some funeral homes for chemical cremation. Lye has been a mainstay in hair relaxers since the early 1970s, and many black women who want straight hair have come to view the pain and burning relaxers can cause as simply part of a routine salon experience.

Some hair-care companies try to downplay the use of lye in their relaxant formulas, but Cutkelvin says it’s a ruse. “It doesn’t matter if the label says ‘no lye,’ ‘less lye’ or ‘shea butter,’” she says. “Even when it says no lye, that’s not true.” Cutkelvin is one of multitudes of hairdressers who question the safety of hair products for black women.

“It is like the Wild, Wild West when it comes to chemicals,” says Nourbese Flint, policy director at Black Women for Wellness, an advocacy and education nonprofit. “The FDA doesn’t have any power to regulate.” The Food and Drug Administration’s policies on regulating cosmetics and beauty products have remained largely unchanged for nearly 80 years, and that gives companies virtually all of the power to manufacture and market whatever they want without approval from the federal agency. Unlike with drugs, the FDA does not approve cosmetic and beauty products, nor does the agency have mandatory recall authority over any products that are suspected of causing adverse side effects.

SNIP

[murielm99]

1. There have to be some very bright black women

who majored in chemistry. Maybe some of them can start a company that makes safer hair products for black women.

I know that this is easier said than done. But I hope someone like Ms. Cutkelvin can suggest it. I suspect it would find willing investors.

[pnwmom]

2. There probably isn't some really safe product for hair straightening

that won't undo itself in humidity.

It's too bad so many of us curly-tops feel compelled to follow that style.

[secondwind]

3. Bring back the 'Fro!!! Problem solved.

[Nitram]

5. I second that! I love hair just the way it grows out.

[JustAnotherGen]

7. It can be a barrier to employment

See Jhan post below. I've been natural for 20 years - but mixed chicks can blow out our hair to make it "fit" corporate America.

[Dustlawyer]

4. Another example, if we needed one, of why we have regulations.

Even industry leaders are asking for some regulations. Being the wild west out there for beauty products is scary. Makes me thankful I am already bald. I just have to worry about skin cancer on top of my head.

[forjusticethunders]

6. and the thing is that we've kinda accepted this shit as normal

like just part of being black, even after the natural hair movement.

I mean when you can get fired for wearing your hair in a style suited to your hair texture then, yeah.