Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

rug

(82,333 posts)
Wed May 28, 2014, 02:49 PM May 2014

The Real Origins of the Religious Right

They’ll tell you it was abortion. Sorry, the historical record’s clear: It was segregation.



By RANDALL BALMER
May 27, 2014

One of the most durable myths in recent history is that the religious right, the coalition of conservative evangelicals and fundamentalists, emerged as a political movement in response to the U.S. Supreme Court’s 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling legalizing abortion. The tale goes something like this: Evangelicals, who had been politically quiescent for decades, were so morally outraged by Roe that they resolved to organize in order to overturn it.

This myth of origins is oft repeated by the movement’s leaders. In his 2005 book, Jerry Falwell, the firebrand fundamentalist preacher, recounts his distress upon reading about the ruling in the Jan. 23, 1973, edition of the Lynchburg News: “I sat there staring at the Roe v. Wade story,” Falwell writes, “growing more and more fearful of the consequences of the Supreme Court’s act and wondering why so few voices had been raised against it.” Evangelicals, he decided, needed to organize.

Some of these anti-Roe crusaders even went so far as to call themselves “new abolitionists,” invoking their antebellum predecessors who had fought to eradicate slavery.

But the abortion myth quickly collapses under historical scrutiny. In fact, it wasn’t until 1979—a full six years after Roe—that evangelical leaders, at the behest of conservative activist Paul Weyrich, seized on abortion not for moral reasons, but as a rallying-cry to deny President Jimmy Carter a second term. Why? Because the anti-abortion crusade was more palatable than the religious right’s real motive: protecting segregated schools. So much for the new abolitionism.

http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2014/05/religious-right-real-origins-107133.html#.U4YvNk7D_3g

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Real Origins of the Religious Right (Original Post) rug May 2014 OP
This explains a lot about that mindset then... and how it is now: essentially the same. CurtEastPoint May 2014 #1
Yeah, it's completely untrue. Clearly linked to the political shift that happened during the passage AtheistCrusader May 2014 #2
It was more like an evolution than a definitive event, imo. cbayer May 2014 #3
Agent of Intolerance struggle4progress May 2014 #4
it's the same guys MisterP May 2014 #5
I'm not sure it's an either/or question. Jim__ May 2014 #6

CurtEastPoint

(18,652 posts)
1. This explains a lot about that mindset then... and how it is now: essentially the same.
Wed May 28, 2014, 03:13 PM
May 2014

Except you can't say it in 2014. Not in those words, at least. Code words are OK.

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
2. Yeah, it's completely untrue. Clearly linked to the political shift that happened during the passage
Wed May 28, 2014, 06:12 PM
May 2014

of the civil rights act. Roe vs. Wade had nothing at all to do with it.

Prior to 1964, the Republican Party supported suffrage, some members openly pushed for anti-discrimination laws for homosexuals, you name it. Republicans supported the CRA in higher numbers than Democrats did. But fast forward to 1979, and you'd find the support flipped, massively in favor of Democrats. The parties completely re-aligned during the 60's.

Evangelicals and the rise of the neocon... what a fucking disaster.

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
3. It was more like an evolution than a definitive event, imo.
Wed May 28, 2014, 06:35 PM
May 2014

I think the religious right began to organize against integration, but didn't become a significant political force until much later.

They become increasingly worried about abortion and GLBT civil rights.

In my opinion, they were then co-opted by the neocons who saw a golden opportunity to form a one or two issue voting bloc who might not pay much attention to the rest of their agenda.

And that's when the real trouble began.

I think he provides a nice summary of a certain period, but it's not a definitive answer.

Perhaps we have an opportunity to do what the neocons did to some extent by identifying issues they have concerns about and help them rally around it. I think one area may be global climate change, an issue many evangelical groups have organized around.

struggle4progress

(118,301 posts)
4. Agent of Intolerance
Wed May 28, 2014, 07:15 PM
May 2014

This article appeared in the May 28, 2007 edition of The Nation.
Max Blumenthal

... Decades before the forces that now make up the Christian right declared their culture war, Falwell was a rabid segregationist who railed against the civil rights movement from the pulpit of the abandoned backwater bottling plant he converted into Thomas Road Baptist Church ... "The true Negro does not want integration.... He realizes his potential is far better among his own race" ... In a 1964 sermon, "Ministers and Marchers," Falwell attacked King as a Communist subversive ... He retreated from massive resistance and founded the Lynchburg Christian Academy, an institution described by the Lynchburg News in 1966 as "a private school for white students" ...

http://www.thenation.com/article/agent-intolerance

Jim__

(14,077 posts)
6. I'm not sure it's an either/or question.
Thu May 29, 2014, 11:41 AM
May 2014

Reading the article, I get the distinct impression that it was, at least, a combination of the 2 issues.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»The Real Origins of the R...