Religion
Related: About this forumIf Religions Were Real (TRIGGER WARNING! VIOLENCE!)
well, that trigger warning thing should be a known given the subject matter but anyway-
If Religions Were Real!
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)snooper2
(30,151 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)But I could have done without the crunch when he broke the guys neck.
skepticscott
(13,029 posts)with the big loud violence warning would have been the way to do without it, dude.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)rug
(82,333 posts)AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)I have it on good authority, from my friend Russell, that there's a teapot in orbit around Jupiter too.
rug
(82,333 posts)AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)How many tens of trillions does it need to steal from the world before it's real?
That's a great question, glad you asked it.
rug
(82,333 posts)Sorry you ignore it.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)Beyond that, whiff and a miss.
rug
(82,333 posts)I am surprised neither by its imprecision nor by your missing it.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)Surely you didn't miss that?
rug
(82,333 posts)AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)rug
(82,333 posts)AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)rug
(82,333 posts)AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)rug
(82,333 posts)AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)a story that isn't real.
Or is it real to you?
rug
(82,333 posts)AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)The amazing, magical, moveable goal posts dance away again.
rug
(82,333 posts)As I pointed out in the first post. Granted, you didn't realize it for four posts.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)An OP whose context is painfully obvious, I might add.
enki23
(7,788 posts)A "you're cherry picking" defense can be legitimate against almost anything *but* an omni-whatever deity. The typical omni-whatever deity doesn't get to be an omni-whatever if it fails even once. That's a tough burden of proof, but that's what stupid claims get you. The only alternative is to claim deific incompetence.
rug
(82,333 posts)The thread is about religion not piñatas.
enki23
(7,788 posts)You open with the ridiculously stupid semantic "real vs. true," and the rest is just youtube level snark.
rug
(82,333 posts)A "you're cherry picking" defense can be legitimate against almost anything *but* an omni-whatever deity. The typical omni-whatever deity doesn't get to be an omni-whatever if it fails even once. That's a tough burden of proof, but that's what stupid claims get you. The only alternative is to claim deific incompetence.
Unrolling clichés.
enki23
(7,788 posts)When you make a stupid cliche claim, it's cliche to call it stupid. It remains stupid. It's cliche to call the emperor naked. He's still fucking naked. It's cliche to demand evidence for magic. And yet, people still tell you it's real.
It's only cliche to call stupid stupid because the stupid won't stop being stupid.
(And last I checked, you were the one who accused somebody of "cherry-picking" which is pretty fucking cliche. Touche. I'll call this one myself. It's not the nonbelievers' fault we go in these circles. You are the ones who keep going round them. My reasoning is linear. That's why people on the merry-go-round think it's a fucking tangent.)
rug
(82,333 posts)As does repeating "stupid" seven times.
Trolling, indeed.
enki23
(7,788 posts).
rug
(82,333 posts).
rug
(82,333 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)I think it is self-evident
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)It's a little unfair to expect a single scene to deal with the entirety of the bible in one go.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Religions are real. That is a fact, yet you poo-poo us with you invisible friend.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)rug
(82,333 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)rug
(82,333 posts)Imagine the size of its teeth.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)rug
(82,333 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Can't they just leave us alone.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)Honestly, I don't envy you. I'd hate to have to defend that pile of bullshit too.
rug
(82,333 posts)AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)Worldviews, take a little more effort.
rug
(82,333 posts)AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)hell tell me all about your imaginary friend.
Frankly, I think 'believing' in George is far less harmful. Besides I saw him in an episode of Bonanza once.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)You can prove they are real.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)supernatural entities? Not a shred of evidence.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)Yeah, it's real. You can read it. Lots of people like it. It's got pages and everything.
Still not 'real', as in non-fiction.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)true. It's not offensive to me, to disagree.
We ARE talking about an idea here. One that you seem to have already accepted as not literal truth, correct? If the stories in the bible were real, literal truth, it goes down something like the anthropomorphic bears in the OP video.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)relevant to explaining the universe and our place in it, insulting.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)I stillfind it insulting. Am I allowed my opinion?
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)You are free to find it insulting. I asked you why, I didn't say you weren't allowed to feel that way.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)I hope your rabbit behaves.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)okasha
(11,573 posts)You dragged this thread through 66 posts because you couldn't admit that "real" and "true" don't mean the same thing in this context. Get thee to a dictionary.
And next time, let the rabbit type.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)okasha
(11,573 posts)AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)The context of the video title is obvious. Want to get pedantic? Me too. I'm game.
okasha
(11,573 posts)not to do somrthing silly just because little Johnny next door is doing it?
Here's an analogy. Is Huckleberry Finn a true story? Were Huck, Pap, Jim, and Tom Sawyer all.actual people who lived by the Mississippi before the Civil War? No? Good, you get it.
Now, is Huckleberry Finn a real story? Does it have characters, a plot, a location in time and place? Of course it does, and those characteristics identify it as a real story. And being a real story has nothing to do with whether it's a true story.
See the difference?
And just out of curiosity, if religion isn't real, why do you spend so much time online complaining about something that doesn't exist? Or is that the rabbit?
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)Way to read the thread. (Post 49)
okasha
(11,573 posts)You're still pushing the same confusion of the terms tou were yesterday. "Real story" is not synonymous with "true story." "Religion is real" is not the same statement as "Religion is true." Even the latter is rather sloppy and generalized. "Religion X's teaching about Y is troe/not true" would be more accurate.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)re·al [ree-uhl, reel] Show IPA
adjective
1. true; not merely ostensible, nominal, or apparent: the real reason for an act.
Waste someone else's time with your bullshit.
okasha
(11,573 posts)Have a nice day. And please consider joining that blacjack game.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)It's The Night of the Lepus!
Run! Run for your liiiiiv------
(Does anyone but me remember that dreadful film?)
rug
(82,333 posts)AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)rug
(82,333 posts)AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)In precisely the same way. Filed under 'Fiction'.
rug
(82,333 posts)I'm getting off.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)cbayer
(146,218 posts)What a major talent this guy is.
Hope you will be posting more of his amazing stuff in the future!
snooper2
(30,151 posts)First time I have an OP where when I go to my posts and it now has 5 replies-
Come to the thread and I'm like- Wow super sub-thread! Am I in record terrority yet?
cbayer
(146,218 posts)tends to be contentious to begin with. That should be no surprise.
Starboard Tack
(11,181 posts)That'll teach those who make fun of the follically challenged.