Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
Wed Jun 13, 2012, 01:22 PM Jun 2012

In God we trust?

http://thehill.com/capital-living/cover-stories/232445-in-god-we-trust-

By Debbie Siegelbaum - 06/12/12 07:55 PM ET

Edwina Rogers refuses to name names. If the executive director of the Secular Coalition for America knows which members of Congress aren’t religious, she isn’t telling.

Her organization, an advocacy group representing a growing number of nontheistic Americans, recently conducted a silent poll of members of Congress about their faith and personal beliefs. And according to Rogers, 28 of the 535 lawmakers claimed they did not personally believe in a higher power.


But only one, Rep. Pete Stark (D-Calif.), has publicly acknowledged his atheist views. The rest are staying mum, and Rogers won’t break their confidence.

“There is a perception that if you don’t have religion, then you are less likely to basically be a good person,” Rogers said.

more at link

14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
In God we trust? (Original Post) cbayer Jun 2012 OP
Hope she has good security. Indydem Jun 2012 #1
She comes from the republican criminal element. rug Jun 2012 #3
Which makes one wonder what is really going on here, doesn't it. cbayer Jun 2012 #4
I would guess a conservative Atheist. Indydem Jun 2012 #5
I don't know about that. I personally consider W a whackadoo rightist. cbayer Jun 2012 #6
Wait...what? laconicsax Jun 2012 #12
That depends on how you'd charactize, HW, W and Lott. rug Jun 2012 #9
All others pay cash. nt rrneck Jun 2012 #2
Sounds about right to me dmallind Jun 2012 #7
Image problems, imo. cbayer Jun 2012 #8
anti-atheist bigotry imo dmallind Jun 2012 #10
I don't know. cbayer Jun 2012 #11
Would calling a group of believers "dumbasses" be mocking them? trotsky Jun 2012 #13
Wow, just wow. laconicsax Jun 2012 #14
 

Indydem

(2,642 posts)
1. Hope she has good security.
Wed Jun 13, 2012, 01:34 PM
Jun 2012

The republican criminal element is devising a break in plan as I write this.

Anything to club those atheists with.

 

Indydem

(2,642 posts)
5. I would guess a conservative Atheist.
Wed Jun 13, 2012, 01:56 PM
Jun 2012

Based on her record, she doesn't seem to have been involved with whackadoo rightists.

 

laconicsax

(14,860 posts)
12. Wait...what?
Wed Jun 13, 2012, 02:49 PM
Jun 2012

You don't consider *, the former illegal occupant of the White House a whackadoo rightist?

Did I read that correctly?

 

rug

(82,333 posts)
9. That depends on how you'd charactize, HW, W and Lott.
Wed Jun 13, 2012, 02:13 PM
Jun 2012

"She was an Economic Advisor for President George W. Bush at the White House during 2001 and 2002 at the National Economic Council, focusing on health and social security policy. Ms. Rogers was General Counsel of the National Republican Senatorial Committee during the Republican take-over of the Senate in 1994. She worked for Senator Lott while he was Majority Leader in 1999 and she handled health policy for Senator Sessions in 2003 and 2004. Edwina worked on International Trade matters for former President George H. W. Bush at the Department of Commerce from 1989 to 1991."

dmallind

(10,437 posts)
7. Sounds about right to me
Wed Jun 13, 2012, 02:04 PM
Jun 2012

5% who'll even admit it privately. Probably a few more who are even cagier. Funny that Muslims, Jews and Mormons feel no need to hide their opinions on religion to get elected here, but nonbelievers do.

dmallind

(10,437 posts)
10. anti-atheist bigotry imo
Wed Jun 13, 2012, 02:14 PM
Jun 2012

and...come to think of it, in a large number of reputable surveys.

But hey if atheists just cleaned up their "image" they'd be considered fairly as candidates eh?

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
11. I don't know.
Wed Jun 13, 2012, 02:22 PM
Jun 2012

I think most atheists are quiet and choose not to engage in religious matters.

Then again, the ones you really see do things like mock believers using purposefully inflammatory imagery and such.

While I have no doubt that anti-atheist bigotry is a major problem, there may be some simple things atheists could do to counter that. Like not mocking those who see the world differently.

trotsky

(49,533 posts)
13. Would calling a group of believers "dumbasses" be mocking them?
Wed Jun 13, 2012, 02:52 PM
Jun 2012

They merely see the world differently.

 

laconicsax

(14,860 posts)
14. Wow, just wow.
Wed Jun 13, 2012, 03:00 PM
Jun 2012

If ever there were a comment that illustrated a person's complete lack of knowledge and understanding on a subject, you just made it.

I would take the time to educate you on this but I honestly don't know where to start.

Maybe I'll give you something to ponder:

Widespread discrimination against atheists predates the Internet by centuries.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»In God we trust?