Journalists go rabbit hunting while covering news about Catholic doctrine
November 7, 2014
By George Conger
Who gets to define Catholic doctrine? That should be an easy one – the Catholic Church defines doctrine for itself through its catechism, liturgy and through the statements of its magisterium.
This truism gets tricky for newspapers when individuals who are Catholic make claims about Catholicism that do not square with the church’s formal teachings. It is the problem of self-definition. I may believe myself to be the pope and call myself the true Bishop of Rome, but does that make it true?
Newspaper reports of female Catholic priests or of same-sex Catholic blessings are being faithful to the facts when they stated the participants claim to be Catholic and that their actions are in accord with Catholic teachings (or should be in accord if the teachings were only brought up to date). Yet these assertions conflict with the truth claims of the institutional church.
These Pontius Pilate-like musings were prompted by an article in the Limerick Post about animal cruelty and Catholicism. The story entitled “Anger over priest’s ‘offensive’ blessing of coursing club grounds in County Limerick” has animal rights activists defining the church’s teaching on animal cruelty. Are these claims correct? Is the Limerick Post allowing the activists to set the norms of Catholic moral teaching?
http://www.getreligion.org/getreligion/2014/11/6/journalists-go-rabbit-hunting-while-covering-news-about-catholic-doctrine
