Science
Related: About this forumNext Supercontinent Will Form in Arctic, Geologists Say
Next Supercontinent Will Form in Arctic, Geologists Say
By SINDYA N. BHANOO
Published: February 8, 2012
Geologists have long predicted that North and South America will eventually fuse together and merge with Asia, forming a new supercontinent along the lines of the ancient Pangea the precursor to todays great land masses, which separated about 200 million years ago.
In the past, researchers had guessed that the new continent, often called Amasia, would form either in the same location as Pangea, closing over the Atlantic near present-day Africa, or 180 degrees away, on the other side of the world.
But a new study predicts that Amasia will form over the Arctic Ocean.
The fusion of North and South America together will close the Caribbean Sea and meet Eurasia at the present-day North Pole, said Ross Nelson Mitchell, a geologist at Yale University, who worked on the study as part of his doctoral research.
More:
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/14/science/amasia-supercontinent-will-form-in-the-arctic-geologists-predict.html?_r=1&src=mv&ref=science
laconicsax
(14,860 posts)Higher-latitude climates are awesome
Lint Head
(15,064 posts)Of course republicans think all science is BS
DCKit
(18,541 posts)Warpy
(111,270 posts)plus the fact that the Atlantic is spreading along the central ridge should have told them that a long time ago.
pokerfan
(27,677 posts)but on the plus side, Rio de Janeiro will be closer so flights should be cheaper.
libinnyandia
(1,374 posts)Yo_Mama
(8,303 posts)Anyone up on those theories currently? The last I remember, the theory was that land mass formation, and where the land masses were, greatly affected albedos?
Just wondering, not expecting to deal with this problem in the near future.
glinda
(14,807 posts)HopeHoops
(47,675 posts)We're the only species that actually INTENTIONALLY fucks up our own environment, along with that of every other species. The world will get along just fine without us, and probably much better.
AlecBGreen
(3,874 posts)you actually want humanity to go extinct? wouldnt it be better to just get our shit together instead?
edit - on re-reading, I cant tell if you want that to happen or if you mean it would just be the best thing possible for the earth. sorry if I misinterpreted you.
HopeHoops
(47,675 posts)I think it was getting along fine until we started polluting everything, destroying old-growth forests, bombing the piss out of everything - they never count the number of dead bunny rabbits.
We're vastly overpopulated in many areas around the world and treat the land as if we own it. I don't care what a piece of paper says about "ownership", we're merely tenants. Yes it is a bleak world view. I would love to think that we could "get our shit together", but history says otherwise. We'll always be at war for the sake of war. We'll always be slaves to the system of the few that own everything.
If we could prove, beyond any doubt, that our actions gave us 150 years before all life on the planet was extinct, the ones with the money would accept the fact and not give a shit because that's after they will die and after their kids and grandchildren will die. Fuck anything beyond that.