Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

n2doc

(47,953 posts)
Wed Oct 7, 2015, 08:59 AM Oct 2015

Your Weight Is About to Be Redefined

A physicist at the National Institute of Standards and Technology once said, “If somebody sneezed on [the] kilogram standard, all the weights in the world would be instantly wrong.”

He was referring to a cylinder, sometimes called Le Gran K, which is housed in a vault in Paris and handled like a priceless gem. The mass of anything measured in the world—you, your groceries, exoplanets, galaxies—traces to the mass of this 126-year-old platinum-iridium cylinder,* the so-called international prototype. Researchers in every field of science and engineering need to trust that they’re using the same reference point as every other scientist and engineer. No cylinder, no reference.



Le Gran K is the kilogram against which all kilograms are measured, and scientists do anything to avoid exposing it to dirty hands and dirty air—and especially to sneezes.

Every few decades, since the prototype’s been around, scientists have removed the cylinder, cleaned it with a solvent, washed it with steam, and scrutinized its mass. They verify that its six official copies, housed in the same vault, still match up exactly.

Three verifications, roughly 40 years apart, have occurred since 1889. In 1992, disaster struck: A comparison of the second and third measurements suggested either that the original had lost about 50 micrograms—around the mass of a grain of sand—or that the copies had gained that amount. Though miniscule, those measurements showed that “the kilogram is not stable,” says Peter Mohr, a physicist involved in an effort to redefine the basic units of measurement.

This is why many scientists decry the primacy of the cylinder as an outright embarrassment with the potential to wreak havoc on the practice of science. As the 2014 Norwegian film 1001 grams put it, “Man determines the definition of weight, but it’s equally important to understand what the definition of weight does to man.”

Fortunately, all this is about to change.

more

http://nautil.us/blog/your-weight-is-about-to-be-redefined

13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

DetlefK

(16,423 posts)
1. Just tell me: Can I gain weight or not?
Wed Oct 7, 2015, 09:35 AM
Oct 2015

I wish the article would have gone into more details, e.g. how they want to replace the cylinder with a super-pure sphere of a defined number of silicon14-atoms.

 

Travis_0004

(5,417 posts)
2. This is kind of old news
Wed Oct 7, 2015, 09:51 AM
Oct 2015

I know a few years ago somebody was trying to make a perfect sphere out of silicon, since silicon is very stable. If they could do that, they can calculate how many atoms there are, and possibly set the standard as being x atoms of silicon.

Binkie The Clown

(7,911 posts)
3. I found a rock in the woods that weighed exactly 1 pound.
Wed Oct 7, 2015, 01:34 PM
Oct 2015

I keep it in a box under my work bench, but if they need a new standard, I'd be happy to donate it.

roomtomove

(217 posts)
7. Everything is relative.....
Fri Oct 9, 2015, 10:20 AM
Oct 2015

....so I adjust my scale to the weight I want to be....hence no exercise or diets needed.........

airplaneman

(1,240 posts)
8. based on my own personal experience
Fri Oct 9, 2015, 02:39 PM
Oct 2015

unlike mass which can not be created or destroyed.
My body weight can only be created and never destroyed.
Its a bummer I know.
-Airplane

muriel_volestrangler

(101,361 posts)
10. The pound, as used in the USA, is defined in terms of the international kilogram
Fri Oct 9, 2015, 06:47 PM
Oct 2015
Announcement. Effective July 1, 1959, all calibrations in the U.S. customary system of weights and measures carried out by the National Bureau of Standards will continue to be based upon metric measurement standards and, except those for the U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey as noted below, will be made in terms of the following exact equivalents and appropriate multiples and submultiples:
1 yard= 0.914 4 meter
1 pound (avoirdupois)= 0.453 592 37 kilogram

http://www.ngs.noaa.gov/PUBS_LIB/FedRegister/FRdoc59-5442.pdf

and if you read further, you find the American pound and yard definitions have been based on the kilogram and meter since the 1890s. So every time the meter has been more precisely defined, the definition of the foot has changed with it.
 

Demeter

(85,373 posts)
11. Who gives a care? Only those who work in tiny tolerances for error
Sat Oct 10, 2015, 05:00 PM
Oct 2015

Physicists, chemists, engineers....sometimes it matters.

The rest of us can live with imprecision. "Close enough for government work" is a very healthy attitude.

SeattleVet

(5,479 posts)
12. "Close enough for government work"...
Sat Oct 10, 2015, 07:16 PM
Oct 2015

I always understood that this was where you measure it with a micrometer, mark it with a piece of chalk, and cut it with an axe.

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»Your Weight Is About to B...