I'm glad Debbie Wasserman Schultz CORRECTED Big Ed about Romney having more debate time than the Pre

[bigdarryl]

Because I think Big Ed is UNDERESTIMATING Romney as a debater . He says Romney has been all over the place on issues TRUE he has but guess what the rethug voter doesn't care about that . http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2012/09/27/wasserman_schultz_on_debate_cant_discount_that_romney_is_an_experienced_and_skilled_debater.html

[Ninga]

1. The bar has been set so low, virtually under the ground, that all

Romney has to do is walk across the ground to be declared the winner.

Just watch it unfold right before your very eyes. And remember, I told you so.

[bigdarryl]

2. I wouldn't say the bar is low for Romney but regardless the debates ain't going to matter

Just remember in 04 Kerry won ALL the debates against GW Bush and it didn't matter and by the way Allan Lichtman predicted Bush would be reelected one year out.

[Scuba]

3. If Romney can come up with just one single line that resonates, the MSM will air it forever.

[TroyD]

4. Romney sent a memo to CNN lowering debate expectations

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2012/09/27/first-on-cnn-romney-memo-seeks-to-lower-debate-expectations/

[smorkingapple]

5. Wait, I thought Obama was a moron who always needs a teleprompter?

Is he a bumbling idiot who can't speak with prepared text or is he a formidable debater? Which one is it?

Make up your fucking minds already Republicans.

As for Romney as a good debater, he looked good in the Republican debates going against a minor league lineup. I mean look at the clowns he was up against. Obama's been up there against the best and on the brightest stages.