Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yavin4

(35,438 posts)
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 08:41 PM Feb 2016

No matter who wins the nomination, Dems are going to lose in the Fall

This is quickly becoming a brutal primary fight, and whichever side wins, there will be long, enduring hurt feelings that won't heal in time for the Fall election.

We're fractured as a party, and I just don't see us coming together in the numbers and strength to beat back the Republicans. A loss in November will have major repercussions for all Americans for generations to come.

Yes, I am being doom and gloom. But sometimes the truth is doom and gloom.

Prepare yourselves and be well.

47 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
No matter who wins the nomination, Dems are going to lose in the Fall (Original Post) Yavin4 Feb 2016 OP
Respectfully disagree. H2O Man Feb 2016 #1
Thats a given to me Go Vols Feb 2016 #4
Right. H2O Man Feb 2016 #7
This message was self-deleted by its author stopbush Feb 2016 #37
Some of us, would like to avoid bought candidates. JRLeft Feb 2016 #38
Respectfully disagree. H2O Man Feb 2016 #41
Do you see the republican primary? NCTraveler Feb 2016 #2
polite, mature, and most importantly, SANE restorefreedom Feb 2016 #18
I think you're half right... daleanime Feb 2016 #3
Yes there will be hurt feelings but unapatriciated Feb 2016 #5
It's no worse than 2008. That was just as crazy. The Velveteen Ocelot Feb 2016 #6
I think it is much worse. sadoldgirl Feb 2016 #11
I am glad you put in that "(OK, nothing's worse than Palin " pangaia Feb 2016 #29
Weren't we fractured in 2008 TlalocW Feb 2016 #8
Is Lieberman still here? pangaia Feb 2016 #30
He's still alive TlalocW Feb 2016 #42
I wouldn't invest a lot of energy into that imagination. Shit happens, things change. 99th_Monkey Feb 2016 #9
You need to switch to a milder smoke of choice. Xipe Totec Feb 2016 #10
Had DWS done her job as an unbiased entity, this might not look dicey for the fall. AtomicKitten Feb 2016 #12
sanders vs clinton is turning out to be a ted kennedy vs jimmy carter battle redux BlueStateLib Feb 2016 #13
that says something - HRC is not an incumbent President karynnj Feb 2016 #34
Time to put it down and walk away WhaTHellsgoingonhere Feb 2016 #14
Now that was funny! Please elaborate on the "cybersuicide by cop" thing leftofcool Feb 2016 #20
You know, the guys who get sick of DU but won't leave WhaTHellsgoingonhere Feb 2016 #22
Aha! Got it. leftofcool Feb 2016 #24
Walt Starr! kath Feb 2016 #35
Prediction markets still have the Dems up 60-40. All is not lost. DanTex Feb 2016 #15
Hardly. Anytime there is a contested nomination people choose sides Godhumor Feb 2016 #16
Oh, I'd hold my nose and vote for Bernie alcibiades_mystery Feb 2016 #17
The Dems are fractured? grntuscarora Feb 2016 #19
As Colbert once remarked about another prognostication, "That's a sharp and very pointed analysis... Journeyman Feb 2016 #21
Republicans and Independents *will* vote for Sanders. TheProgressive Feb 2016 #23
Independents are swingers RobertEarl Feb 2016 #25
Listen, when you're up against Satin [sic], you get out and vote. Gregorian Feb 2016 #26
Really? Gothmog Feb 2016 #27
Yep, my concern is some democrats will sit home, pee their pants and feel warm and RKP5637 Feb 2016 #28
Who says? You? brush Feb 2016 #31
Doom and gloom, indeed .... Trajan Feb 2016 #32
It's got nothing to do with the primary and everything to do with structure Recursion Feb 2016 #33
Nah we'll be all hugs and kisses by November. Kalidurga Feb 2016 #36
Whiny Tarc Feb 2016 #39
Debbie has done everything she could to screw the pooch. mhatrw Feb 2016 #40
We've had exactly ONE State vote... brooklynite Feb 2016 #43
Game over man, Game over... FSogol Feb 2016 #44
No We Can't! No We Can't! USA, We're #32! USA, We're #32! nt TheBlackAdder Feb 2016 #45
I don't agree mvd Feb 2016 #46
I agree only partially nadinbrzezinski Feb 2016 #47

Response to H2O Man (Reply #1)

H2O Man

(73,537 posts)
41. Respectfully disagree.
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 10:54 PM
Feb 2016

The Democratic Party is seriously damaged. It's far superior to the republican party, of course. But everyone needs to work towards repairing it ....without pointing fingers at others.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
2. Do you see the republican primary?
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 08:44 PM
Feb 2016

We're straight up polite compared to what they are doing. This is what a primary should look like. Clinton and Sanders are out there talking about issues we care deeply about every day.

restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)
18. polite, mature, and most importantly, SANE
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 09:04 PM
Feb 2016

every time i feel bad about our collective dischord and issues, i watch a few minutes of the freak show going on over there.

and the hillary bernie angst seems minor..i don't think it IS minor, but they are such a dumpster fire, it makes it look like H and B are going to break into a chorus of kumbaya....


THATs how bad the other side is.

daleanime

(17,796 posts)
3. I think you're half right...
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 08:45 PM
Feb 2016

choosing the wrong candidate will finish the party. Do we try to stay the same and wither and fail, or do we look to move forward?

unapatriciated

(5,390 posts)
5. Yes there will be hurt feelings but
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 08:45 PM
Feb 2016

the majority of us will put those aside to insure a Democrat in the White House.

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,693 posts)
6. It's no worse than 2008. That was just as crazy.
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 08:46 PM
Feb 2016

And this year's GOPers are even worse than McCain/Palin (OK, nothing's worse than Palin - but McCain wasn't as bad as Trump/Cruz/Rubio).

sadoldgirl

(3,431 posts)
11. I think it is much worse.
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 08:56 PM
Feb 2016

W was such a misery for the repugs, that it was easier
to swing the dems in.It is not even comparable to 68.

That time the dems were split, but the repugs were
united.

This time both parties are faced with a very frustrated
and angry electorate, unlike anything I have seen before.

That means there may be a serious split in both parties.

I cannot predict anything, but it does not help us that
Obama as a dem occupied the WH for 8 years. That
normally brings about a wish for a change.

Then again, this is not a normal election year.

TlalocW

(15,382 posts)
8. Weren't we fractured in 2008
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 08:51 PM
Feb 2016

With one of the candidates being Hillary, and her supporters promising not to vote if she didn't get the nomination? Whether she or Bernie gets it, I think we'll come together.

Now, we've seen what the republicans did when Hillary lost - they put Palin on the ticket because they believe women and different ethnic groups don't care about actual issues but only voting for, "one of their own." So if Bernie loses, I predict the republicans will ask Lieberman to be their veep candidate.*

TlalocW

*Because he's also a 70-something Jewish guy. Not for any other political reason.

TlalocW

(15,382 posts)
42. He's still alive
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 01:06 PM
Feb 2016

He's not in congress anymore. He's now part of a conservative think tank.

TlalocW

 

99th_Monkey

(19,326 posts)
9. I wouldn't invest a lot of energy into that imagination. Shit happens, things change.
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 08:52 PM
Feb 2016

the 2008 race was every bit as nasty, then Obama won in a landslide.

Xipe Totec

(43,890 posts)
10. You need to switch to a milder smoke of choice.
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 08:53 PM
Feb 2016

The worst Democratic candidate, on a bad day, with an absinthe hangover, is better than any Republican candidate, on a good day, with monitored and enforced sobriety, and leather strapped restraint jacket.

 

AtomicKitten

(46,585 posts)
12. Had DWS done her job as an unbiased entity, this might not look dicey for the fall.
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 08:58 PM
Feb 2016

The sparse and crap scheduling of debates was meant to suffocate her opponents' campaigns in the crib because of their lack of name recognition. Camp Weathervane intended to ride the wave of Hillary's huge name recognition right into the GE. We lost a good man, M'OM, in the process, and Bernie has had to work his ass off with zero party support and zero MSM coverage to being the formidable contender he is now. There is no love lost between the camps. By the time this is over, it will split the party in two.

BlueStateLib

(937 posts)
13. sanders vs clinton is turning out to be a ted kennedy vs jimmy carter battle redux
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 08:58 PM
Feb 2016

a few more 2014 like loses, theie won't be any democratic party

The Democratic Party sat on a wall,
The Democratic Party had a great fall;
All the king's horses and all the king's men
Couldn't put The Democratic Party back together again.

karynnj

(59,503 posts)
34. that says something - HRC is not an incumbent President
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 09:54 PM
Feb 2016

However, I do not think you wrong in making the compsrison. The official party is treating it that way.

 

WhaTHellsgoingonhere

(5,252 posts)
14. Time to put it down and walk away
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 09:01 PM
Feb 2016

Take a holiday from politics. No DU, no talk radio, no Facebook or whatever. I guarantee, it won't change your vote.

I've been at DU since 2005 and look at my post total. I take frequent, long holidays. I've been witness to multiple cybersuicides here. Some leave suicide notes, with others, it's a "suicide by cop" thing.

 

WhaTHellsgoingonhere

(5,252 posts)
22. You know, the guys who get sick of DU but won't leave
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 09:13 PM
Feb 2016

of their own volition. They spam and troll until they get banned by the mods.

Godhumor

(6,437 posts)
16. Hardly. Anytime there is a contested nomination people choose sides
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 09:02 PM
Feb 2016

And then, regardless of why they do it, after the nominee is decided almost everyone comes together to make sure the fuckheads in the other party don't take over.

 

alcibiades_mystery

(36,437 posts)
17. Oh, I'd hold my nose and vote for Bernie
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 09:03 PM
Feb 2016

No money or walking though.



I'm slightly scared of some of his people.

Journeyman

(15,031 posts)
21. As Colbert once remarked about another prognostication, "That's a sharp and very pointed analysis...
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 09:08 PM
Feb 2016
"It must have hurt a lot when you pulled it out."

RKP5637

(67,108 posts)
28. Yep, my concern is some democrats will sit home, pee their pants and feel warm and
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 09:45 PM
Feb 2016

fuzzy about not voting, as the country descends into unlivable for a very long time, especially as the SCOTUS nominations kick in, as President Cruz presides.

brush

(53,778 posts)
31. Who says? You?
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 09:47 PM
Feb 2016

Prove it, as if we're anymore fractured than the repugs.

We outnumber them. They can no longer win the presidency, especially since they alienated Latinos, women, gays, Asian Americans and progressive whites. And you know they're not getting African American votes.

You're wrong. I don't know what your agenda is but we don't need you miscalculated doom and gloom.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
33. It's got nothing to do with the primary and everything to do with structure
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 09:49 PM
Feb 2016

Just the way the system is set up, keeping the White House after 8 years is very, very hard. It's happened once since WWII.

Kalidurga

(14,177 posts)
36. Nah we'll be all hugs and kisses by November.
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 09:57 PM
Feb 2016

Seriously, when we see Republicans coming we always hide behind the nearest Democrat.

Tarc

(10,476 posts)
39. Whiny
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 10:40 PM
Feb 2016

Whichever one does not win the nomination will do all that he or she can to support the nominee, including exhorting their followers to join them in that support. Democrats are not morons like the GOP, we have the bigger picture in mind.

mhatrw

(10,786 posts)
40. Debbie has done everything she could to screw the pooch.
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 10:44 PM
Feb 2016

But if Sanders is nominated, he will beat the Repukes silly with his 99% vs. 1% cudgel.

mvd

(65,173 posts)
46. I don't agree
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 01:17 PM
Feb 2016

The debate last night was more contentious than before, but they were respectful to each other. No name calling and personal insults like on the clown show side. Sometimes Hillary does give Sanders a bit of a look of loathing in debates, but I don't think it is personal. She just really expected an easy time. I think the party is divided between complete progressives like Sanders and people like Hillary who focus on the social issues and guns for progressiveness, but I can tell you I will be out there supporting and voting for whoever the nominee is. Not sure that will happen with Republican voters who did not get their candidate nominated.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
47. I agree only partially
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 01:18 PM
Feb 2016

I got a list of folks for whom I have zero respects for how personal they have gotten with posters here.

But some of us vote on policy. That does not mean i will ever respect or care for these people. I think DU will be more divided.

The Ds should be fine. 99 percent of the voters are not, as of yet, even paying attention. My locals, they won't until oh early May

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»No matter who wins the no...