Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Karmadillo

(9,253 posts)
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 09:18 PM Feb 2016

Maybe Senator Boxer was wrong: "Hillary Clinton’s ‘Progressive’ Persona"

Progressive EVERY day? Maybe not.

https://consortiumnews.com/2016/02/04/hillary-clintons-progressive-persona/

Hillary Clinton’s ‘Progressive’ Persona
February 4, 2016
By Jeff Cohen

<edit>

A quick review of Hillary Clinton’s record shows that much of what she gets done is anti-progressive (not unlike President Clinton in the 1990s).

PROMOTING FRACKING WORLDWIDE IS NOT PROGRESSIVE: On behalf of Chevron and other US oil companies, Secretary of State Clinton and the State Department pushed fracking globally, as Mother Jones has documented: “How Hillary Clinton’s State Department Sold Fracking to the World.”

BOOSTING CORPORATIST TRADE DEALS IS NOT PROGRESSIVE: Secretary Clinton repeatedly praised the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) – as it was being negotiated by the US Trade Representative and her State Department – and she recruited countries into the deal. In October, with Bernie Sanders climbing in the polls, Clinton said she no longer supported the pact, and lied about her earlier boosterism.

ENABLING MILITARY COUPS IS NOT PROGRESSIVE: When she headed the State Department, it enabled a military coup in Honduras that overthrew democratically-elected President Manuel Zelaya, a progressive. Clinton was briefed on the dishonesty that allowed aid to illegally reach the coup government.

POCKETING MILLIONS FROM CORPORATE LECTURE FEES IS NOT PROGRESSIVE: When Wall Street, Big Pharma and other corporate interests paid a soon-to-be presidential candidate an average of $230,000 for a speech, did Hillary Clinton think it was for her brilliant stand-up comedy? Or was it more akin to political bribery? Clinton says these firms just wanted to hear the views of a former Secretary of State on our “complicated world” – or about the Bin Laden raid.

But Politico reported in 2013 soon after one of her three speeches to Goldman Sachs: “Clinton offered a message that the collected plutocrats found reassuring, according to accounts offered by several attendees, declaring that the banker-bashing so popular within both political parties was unproductive and indeed foolish.” (Releasing the speech transcripts would help settle the matter.)

more...

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Maybe Senator Boxer was wrong: "Hillary Clinton’s ‘Progressive’ Persona" (Original Post) Karmadillo Feb 2016 OP
Voting against the Brady Bill, not progressive leftofcool Feb 2016 #1
Voting for war: not progressive ghostsinthemachine Feb 2016 #2
Is voting for bombing of Kosovo provressive? Thinkingabout Feb 2016 #3
KnR.nt m-lekktor Feb 2016 #4

ghostsinthemachine

(3,569 posts)
2. Voting for war: not progressive
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 09:21 PM
Feb 2016

Believing Colin Powell's bullshit: Unforgivable. I KNEW THERE WEREN'T WMD's in IRAQ AND I AM JUST A HIPPIE WITH A COMPUTER!

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
3. Is voting for bombing of Kosovo provressive?
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 09:25 PM
Feb 2016

Is taking action in Afghanistan progressive? Is voting for AUMF progressive?

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Maybe Senator Boxer was w...