Transcripts: I see exactly where this is going:

[Empowerer]

If the campaign releases transcripts and there's nothing damaging in them (just like with the emails - nothing incriminating was found in them, either), Hillary will be accused of destroying incriminating transcripts and only releasing the non-incriminating ones and/or she will be accused of altering the transcripts that the campaign did release.

As sure as night follows day.

Bookmark this post . . .

[Motown_Johnny]

1. Why hasn't she learned to avoid these situations?

Do we really want 4 - 8 years of Clinton bad decisions causing scandals?

As if she will get things done with this kind of crap constantly popping up.

[Empowerer]

4. It's not about "avoiding" these situations. Any situation she is in - her very existence - is enough

for her detractors to accuse her of wrongdoing and to insist that there's a there there even when there's absolutely no there there.

And you can bet that, if Bernie is the nominee - or even starts to look like he could become the nominee - this fire will be turned on him as well and, as they've already proven, their target does not have to have done anything wrong for them to smear them to hell and back.

[redstateblues]

6. Hannity couldn't say it any better

[Agschmid]

10. Scandals... Such as?

Innocent until proven guilty? Nah.

[Fumesucker]

2. This was an easily foreseeable problem for Hillary

Just like with the private server, a poor judgement call on easily foreseeable consequences.

[tularetom]

3. I guarantee you she did not say anything about reparations

Or if she did, you won't like it.

[leftofcool]

5. Yep

[INdemo]

7. She wont release the transcripts because she talks down the

middle class and praises the 1%...She wont release them and it will appear she is hiding something and she is.

[NanceGreggs]

13. Oh, so you've seen the transcripts, have you?

If you haven't, you're obviously just making shit up about what they contain.

[840high]

14. How do you know

it's shit? Have you seen them?

[NanceGreggs]

18. No, I haven't.

But I'm not the one making statements about what is or isn't contained in them, am I?

[INdemo]

34. Hillary Clinton expects us to bellieve that she receives Hundreds of thousand of Dollars

in one evening for speeches ($400,000) and those fees doesn't influence her one bit???
Let me ask you this, If Hillary Clinton told you the sun rises in the West you would believe her ? Right?

Because that makes about as much sense believing Hillary when she said she was not influenced by the speaking fees.
Hillary stood there last night at the Debate for Two hours and lied.She all of a sudden is this progressive that is not influenced by Wall St money?
Her next fund raiser is at Bain Capital affiliate,A Mitt Romney Company.
So do you Think Mitt will write her a check?

http://upload.democraticunderground.com/12511134307

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/02/hillary-clinton-postpones-fundraiser-financial-services-218708#ixzz3zAA1rv16

You Hillary supporters don't understand the fact that if Hillary wins the nomination a large percentage of Democrats will not show on election day ...so Welcome to the White House a Republican

[amborin]

20. this

[JimDandy]

8. She needs to turn them over to some neutral group in the Dem party and get them vetted

to at least make sure there are no 47% gaffes in them. Hundreds of people heard her at each speech, including some who would wish her ill. If she makes it to the GE and then gets shot down by Repubs with dirt from one of the speeches, she will be done in the Dem party.

And of course, people like me would like to see the transcripts just to see if she is consistent on the issues when speaking both to the 1% and the great unwashed. There better be lots of "I am going to be tough on Wall Street" in them, since she keeps telling us, the primary voters that she will. She is such a progressive, don't cha know.

[Agschmid]

9. Yup.

[Hoppy]

11. I heard her first speach was about her wanting to raise taxes on millionaires.

In another speech to Goldman, she outlined her plan to restore Glass-Stiegel.

Then she spoke to the health care corporations where she explained how single payer would benefit all of them.

[Fawke Em]

15. You forgot the sarcasm tag.

[betsuni]

12. What in the hell do people think is in these speeches?

What a ridiculous waste of time whipping themselves into a lather of frenzied anger over nothing.

[Fawke Em]

17. Well, IF there were speeches, we'd like to see if she coddles the 1 percent

when she's talking to them, thus solidifying the belief of many that any talk she makes about taking care of the middle class is just that - talk. She doesn't intend to harm her benefactors at all.

The other point is: did she actually make any speeches or was that just cover for GS to give her thousands of "quid pro quo" dollars.

Both are something Americans should "work themselves in a lather" over.

[Empowerer]

19. Funny thing- they claim she was lying when she said she didn't know for sure then if she would run

for president.

But then they think that she would actually say something really incriminating in a speech that she knew was being recorded.

Hillary-haters - you so crazy!

[morningfog]

21. The speeches were recorded?

[Empowerer]

23. I assume they were recorded if there is a transcript - I doubt anyone was there taking shorthand ...

[JimDandy]

29. I had assumed her speeches were typed up for a teleprompter-hence a transcript.

Romney's 47% remark was caught on video, of course. If her speeches were recorded on video, she may be toast if she made any type of remark like Romney did.

[Empowerer]

35. You're talking about prepared remarks, which may or may not be what was actually said

A transcript captures what was actually said.

[betsuni]

24. They say she lies about everything, but now suddenly she doesn't lie when giving speeches

and coddles, or something. I can never figure out these conspiracies and that assures me I'm still sane.

[frylock]

16. Loosen it up a little.

[oasis]

22. They would be fishing for anything close to a "Romney moment".

You can be sure they would manufacture something to build on.

[asuhornets]

25. I hope she does not release them...Let them wonder.eom

[fourcents]

26. I worry Hillary association with banks is going to lose her the general if she is the nominee

even though the GOP are just as bad or worse on contributions from them. Bernie seems to have no skeletons in the closet.

[asuhornets]

27. he has no skeletons because he has not been vetted. nor does he have any major accomplishments;

But if he wins the nomination, the Republicans will put skeletons in his closet for him.

[fourcents]

30. Let me tell you a few of his major accomplisments: He known as the amendment king, he was....

Let me tell you a few of his major accomplishments: He known as the amendment king, he was one of the founders of the progressive caucus, he help write the ACA and got it expanded, he got the fed audited for the first time ever! maybe you don't care what he did for the veterans look it up. He manage to get voted in overwhelmingly by both Dems. and Repubs. I got a lot more. He is not rich after all those years in office so I can assure you they will not find anything on him.

[asuhornets]

31. nothing stuck so far..but i'm sure you'll continue on a treasure hunt with no luck.eom

[ohnoyoudidnt]

28. She accepted over $600K from one of the main culpruits in the financial meltdown.

I doubt they would have paid Bernie $600K to tell them what he thought about the finance industry in this country.

Whatever is in the transcripts doesn't matter that much to me. The large amount of money she accepted from the people she did does.

[SHRED]

32. ^^ this^^

[Hoyt]

33. Would love to hear her speech to the American Camping Association, Canada 2020,

UCLA, etc. I bet they were bad, bad, bad.