Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
54 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Time Magazine: Who won the 5th debate? (Original Post) Ichingcarpenter Feb 2016 OP
Bernie 86% v Hilary 14% (38,140 votes so far) TheSocialDem Feb 2016 #1
Guess they don't have superdelegates and coin tosses at Time. senz Feb 2016 #2
Or vote hundreds of times online. Oh wait. grossproffit Feb 2016 #4
Well that explains Hillary's votes so far Ichingcarpenter Feb 2016 #6
Trump wins every online poll too. grossproffit Feb 2016 #7
President Carter said he prefers Trump over Cruz Ichingcarpenter Feb 2016 #10
I support both candidates. grossproffit Feb 2016 #11
Answer: Not so much. hedda_foil Feb 2016 #25
And then there is the more logical explanation ... NanceGreggs Feb 2016 #34
I was speaking of DU, Nance. We both know that DU trends older and that 90% of us are for Bernie hedda_foil Feb 2016 #40
Okay... tex-wyo-dem Feb 2016 #41
It's common sense, along with human nature. NanceGreggs Feb 2016 #45
I understand the difference between the polls... tex-wyo-dem Feb 2016 #47
I'm not sure what part of ... NanceGreggs Feb 2016 #48
I'm not talking about you... tex-wyo-dem Feb 2016 #49
Again ... NanceGreggs Feb 2016 #50
Now your presuming a vast majority of... tex-wyo-dem Feb 2016 #52
It's not a matter of who is for BS and who is for HRC ... NanceGreggs Feb 2016 #53
Guess that's why she spent $720,000 on polls last quarter, more than top 6 repugs combined. PonyUp Feb 2016 #42
So what? NanceGreggs Feb 2016 #43
Lol. Bernie is the ultimate underdog and cali Feb 2016 #44
Bernie has been making the same speech for decades. NanceGreggs Feb 2016 #46
Yes and no. I've heard him opine on many issues cali Feb 2016 #54
86-14 Bernie 840high Feb 2016 #3
Challenges Obi-Won Kenobi to debate gyroscope Feb 2016 #5
What???? MrWendel Feb 2016 #8
So, are you saying that HRC's people aren't passionate enough, just SBS's people? I don't buy it! nt TheBlackAdder Feb 2016 #14
Me either... MrWendel Feb 2016 #15
By an 85/15 ratio? Come one, the optics of your comment don't bear reality! nt TheBlackAdder Feb 2016 #16
You honestly... MrWendel Feb 2016 #22
Those damn kids. Get off my lawn. liberal_at_heart Feb 2016 #24
That was the .... MrWendel Feb 2016 #26
Do you mean the Canadian border? It seems that most of the people over staying their liberal_at_heart Feb 2016 #28
You too? MrWendel Feb 2016 #29
I used to be a Democrat back when the Democratic platform was anti war and pro social services. liberal_at_heart Feb 2016 #30
Then ... MrWendel Feb 2016 #31
I choose not to discuss who I will vote for in the GE. I don't plan on saying anything that will liberal_at_heart Feb 2016 #32
Great disclaimer Matariki Feb 2016 #9
true enough mikehiggins Feb 2016 #12
Its rather active and you have to wait Ichingcarpenter Feb 2016 #18
I love the disclaimer nadinbrzezinski Feb 2016 #13
You don't think Hillary supporters read Time magazine? gyroscope Feb 2016 #17
I really don't care if they do or not nadinbrzezinski Feb 2016 #19
Trump has won virtually every online debate poll. I think he has lost every debate, ProudToBeLiberal Feb 2016 #20
I could care less what crazy republicans think about their crazy candidates gyroscope Feb 2016 #21
+1 for the truth grossproffit Feb 2016 #35
This baby boomer hasn't cared much for TIME since the 1980s Art_from_Ark Feb 2016 #37
With Bernie at only 86% watch for the MSM & HRC group to declare Hillary the winner. n/t Binkie The Clown Feb 2016 #23
done amborin Feb 2016 #27
At 3:15 a.m. ---> Petrushka Feb 2016 #33
Bernie! bigwillq Feb 2016 #36
Me too.......... cause I can vote a thousand times for Ichingcarpenter Feb 2016 #38
I think Bernie usually wins in the polls is that his voters are more politically active. LiberalArkie Feb 2016 #39
I thought Bernie won, but I am surprised by the percentage! napi21 Feb 2016 #51

Ichingcarpenter

(36,988 posts)
10. President Carter said he prefers Trump over Cruz
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 01:42 AM
Feb 2016

so I guess he votes on those polls too.

You guys think its a conspiracy .......... well
just create your own swarm and change the poll

or don't Clinton supporters use the internet?

hedda_foil

(16,374 posts)
25. Answer: Not so much.
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 02:55 AM
Feb 2016

This is just my opinion, but because they tend to be 45+, I don't think a high percentage of Hillary voters use the internet for news and information. They may email and google, but they don't spend much time on social media except Facebook to check on what their friends and relatives are up to, and the doings of their assorted kids and grandkids. They don't use it much to express their political views. So broadcast "journalism" and other msm are their go-to's for political news.

I'm a 70 year old grandma, so I'm no kid, but like many other older DUers, I get 90% of my information online, and the vast majority of us are for Bernie. I think that's how the age split can be explained. 90% of engaged web users consistently give Bernie the highest marks in online polls. Apparently, only 10-15% Hillary voters are likely to try to find these polls.

But that's what makes these debates so valuable. They're the one place where limited web users can get a better understanding of what the candidates are up to.


I'm asleep on my feet, so I hope this makes sense.

NanceGreggs

(27,814 posts)
34. And then there is the more logical explanation ...
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 04:46 AM
Feb 2016

HRC supporters are interested in the real polls - and understand that on-line polls are meaningless.

"I get 90% of my information online, and the vast majority of us are for Bernie."

Really? That's an interesting stat. Can you provide the links to the surveys/studies that have shown that "the vast majority" of those who get "90% of their information on-line are "for Bernie"?

TIA! I can't wait to see THIS survey!

hedda_foil

(16,374 posts)
40. I was speaking of DU, Nance. We both know that DU trends older and that 90% of us are for Bernie
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 12:34 PM
Feb 2016

Whether my hypothesis can be extrapolated to the general population should be testable at some point by statisticians, but it's too early to do so now.

tex-wyo-dem

(3,190 posts)
41. Okay...
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 01:07 AM
Feb 2016

"HRC supporters are interested in the real polls - and understand that on-line polls are meaningless. "

Can't wait for you to provide the links to those studies/surveys.

NanceGreggs

(27,814 posts)
45. It's common sense, along with human nature.
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 01:34 AM
Feb 2016

If HRC was behind in the real polls, I would probably be looking for on-line polls that said what I wanted to hear, just to make myself feel better about my candidate's chances.

With HRC ahead in scientific polls, why would I bother with on-line polls - which, in the end, are meaningless? They don't screen out those not eligible to vote, nor do most of them prevent anyone from "voting" multiple times. Their only real value is allowing people whose candidate is lagging behind in real polls to convince themselves that the "real polls" are wrong.

If Bernie was ahead of HRC in legitimate polls, do you honestly think his supporters would be bothered with on-line polls? Why would they be? There would be no point.

tex-wyo-dem

(3,190 posts)
47. I understand the difference between the polls...
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 01:55 AM
Feb 2016

But it still doesn't explain why, if Hillary is truly leading in the "real" polls, which is becoming less of a reality everyday btw, she doesn't have enough supporters online to do super simple online polls...if nothing else, just to show support for their candidate. I mean, if she were losing these things by 20 or 30 points, I would understand, but she's losing them by 70, 80, 90 points...makes no sense.

Still waiting for those studies/surveys.

NanceGreggs

(27,814 posts)
48. I'm not sure what part of ...
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 02:04 AM
Feb 2016

... "on-line polls are meaningless" you don't get.

"If nothing else, just to show support for their candidate."

If my candidate is ahead in the REAL polls, why would I need to "show support" in a FAKE poll?

tex-wyo-dem

(3,190 posts)
49. I'm not talking about you...
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 02:23 AM
Feb 2016

I know you think they are meaningless. Fine. Who I'm referring to are the tens of thousands of other Hillary supporters that are online all the time that you would think would take a few seconds and click on these polls since they are so simple and are a quick way to show support for her.

Simple concept.

NanceGreggs

(27,814 posts)
50. Again ...
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 03:04 AM
Feb 2016

Why would anyone take the time - a few seconds or otherwise - to participate in an on-line poll they know to be meaningless?

Why bother?

tex-wyo-dem

(3,190 posts)
52. Now your presuming a vast majority of...
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 03:48 AM
Feb 2016

Hillary supporters think exactly the way you do...that these polls are a waste of time and aren't worth even the few seconds to click on Hillary's name and show support, however insignificant it is.

Hogwash.

My theory, FWIW: a pretty good majority who read articles online, such as the TIME article that this poll is embedded in, are younger people (under age 40-45). And as the "real" polls show, Bernie has much greater support in this age group than Hillary and, thus, is reflected in these "worthless" online polls.

NanceGreggs

(27,814 posts)
53. It's not a matter of who is for BS and who is for HRC ...
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 04:00 AM
Feb 2016

It's a matter of whose candidate is behind in the real polls, and who needs the quick fix that an on-line poll can give.

When your candidate is ahead in the real polls, you have no reason to go searching for on-line polls that support that. When your candidate is behind in the real polls, you turn to on-line polls as an alternative to facing reality.



 

PonyUp

(1,680 posts)
42. Guess that's why she spent $720,000 on polls last quarter, more than top 6 repugs combined.
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 01:16 AM
Feb 2016

And $1.9 million in the quarter before that. What a waste.
She's trying to spend all her money before she loses and it goes to Bernie.

NanceGreggs

(27,814 posts)
43. So what?
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 01:20 AM
Feb 2016

Maybe if Bernie used polls to find out what's going on in 2016 instead of talking about what went on forty years ago, he wouldn't be lagging behind her.

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
44. Lol. Bernie is the ultimate underdog and
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 01:26 AM
Feb 2016

Hillary is as close to being an incumbent as can be imagined. In addition, she's the one stuck in the last century and running an anachronistic campaign.

 

gyroscope

(1,443 posts)
5. Challenges Obi-Won Kenobi to debate
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 01:30 AM
Feb 2016

...predictably gets spanked by the old Jedi master.

Be careful what you ask for Hillary, you just might get it.

MrWendel

(1,881 posts)
22. You honestly...
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 02:11 AM
Feb 2016

think any of that majority ain't millennials that had their minds made up before the debate? You think that there is a accurate balance of all groups in that poll? The internet click polls are useless.

liberal_at_heart

(12,081 posts)
28. Do you mean the Canadian border? It seems that most of the people over staying their
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 03:02 AM
Feb 2016

visas are actually from Canada. Pro war. Anti immigration. Are you sure you are a liberal?

MrWendel

(1,881 posts)
29. You too?
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 03:04 AM
Feb 2016

Is there a rigid definition of liberal? Is anyone really in lock step with all the rules and policies to the letter of what it is to be liberal? Define the ultimate uncompromising definition of a liberal.

And actually. I confused this thread with another one I was writing in. About Foreign policy.

liberal_at_heart

(12,081 posts)
30. I used to be a Democrat back when the Democratic platform was anti war and pro social services.
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 03:09 AM
Feb 2016

That doesn't seem to be the Democratic platform anymore and therefore I am a liberal Independent. I guess you could call me a Democratic Socialist like Bernie. Whether he wins or loses I plan on helping to further the cause of Democratic Socialism because we need to get back to taking care of the people of this country and not just the corporations and the war machine. You can call yourself a liberal if you want. You can call yourself anything you like. I really don't care.

MrWendel

(1,881 posts)
31. Then ...
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 03:13 AM
Feb 2016

why ask the question? You do you, I'm not interested in changing your mind. Come the general, we mostly will go back to being one big dysfunctional family pulling (mostly) in the same direction.

liberal_at_heart

(12,081 posts)
32. I choose not to discuss who I will vote for in the GE. I don't plan on saying anything that will
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 03:16 AM
Feb 2016

get me kicked off the site.

Matariki

(18,775 posts)
9. Great disclaimer
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 01:41 AM
Feb 2016
A disclaimer: Online reader polls like this one are not statistically representative of eligible primary voters. They are a measure, however imprecise, of which candidates have the most energized online supporters, or most social media savvy fan base. After all, what they are counting is the number of Internet-devices controlled by people who want to vote.

mikehiggins

(5,614 posts)
12. true enough
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 01:47 AM
Feb 2016

I went to the site but couldn't figure out how to vote. I think all the security programs on my computer keeps getting in the way.

Probably figures this stupid human spends too much time on the net/

Ichingcarpenter

(36,988 posts)
18. Its rather active and you have to wait
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 02:01 AM
Feb 2016

for the names to come up when it finally loads

then you click on either Hillary or Bernie, your vote is then tabulated and you see the results.

 

gyroscope

(1,443 posts)
17. You don't think Hillary supporters read Time magazine?
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 02:01 AM
Feb 2016

Time is THE quintessential magazine of the baby boomer generation, Hillary's biggest demographic.

And yet she got spanked on their poll.

ProudToBeLiberal

(3,964 posts)
20. Trump has won virtually every online debate poll. I think he has lost every debate,
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 02:04 AM
Feb 2016

Hell, Ron Paul would be President if we judged the online polls. I think he won everyone of them.

 

gyroscope

(1,443 posts)
21. I could care less what crazy republicans think about their crazy candidates
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 02:09 AM
Feb 2016

if Hillary had won the Time poll you would be cheering.

Art_from_Ark

(27,247 posts)
37. This baby boomer hasn't cared much for TIME since the 1980s
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 08:44 AM
Feb 2016

when it started to become a higher brow version of PEOPLE magazine.

Petrushka

(3,709 posts)
33. At 3:15 a.m. --->
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 04:15 AM
Feb 2016

Two Democratic presidential candidates took to the stage for a debate Thursday night. Who do you think won?

Hillary Clinton
14 %
Bernie Sanders
86 %

54,515 Votes

LiberalArkie

(15,715 posts)
39. I think Bernie usually wins in the polls is that his voters are more politically active.
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 10:56 AM
Feb 2016

Most of my neighbors do not vote in the primaries and just vote the party in november. My brother in law is a weird one, solid Hillary but just recently replaced his Hillary bumper sticker with a Trump one after he bought one of the assault weapon clones. Really. I have no idea of how that came about or for what reason.

napi21

(45,806 posts)
51. I thought Bernie won, but I am surprised by the percentage!
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 03:12 AM
Feb 2016

I would have thought it to be much closer like 65-45 maybe. However, it's very pleasant surprise.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Time Magazine: Who won th...