Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumNYTimes: Hillary Clinton again Put on Defensive over Ties to Wall St.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/05/us/politics/hillary-clinton-wall-street-ties.html"Mrs. Clinton seems an imperfect messenger for change."
"Bernie Sanders is a serious contender for the democratic nomination............she seemed to struggle....... I also spoke to surgeons............Elizabeth Warren criticized Mrs. Clinton for shifting her policy on bankruptcy to please her Wall St. donors....she couldn't get campaign donations from struggling families"
NY Times is finally recognizing Bernie Sanders!
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 1436 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (32)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
NYTimes: Hillary Clinton again Put on Defensive over Ties to Wall St. (Original Post)
amborin
Feb 2016
OP
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)1. This meme was born in another OP/string tonight. It kinda fits.
Use it if you like. http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1144702
SHRED
(28,136 posts)4. Nice meme...:-)
Admiral Loinpresser
(3,859 posts)2. Apparently Bernie is very effectively occupying Wall Street. n/t
amborin
(16,631 posts)3. more on tonight's debate from DK:
In 2007, while running for president, Clinton made campaign speeches attacking the tax break for hedge-fund and private-equity executives one of the infamous loopholes that allows rich people to pay way less in taxes than theyre supposed to but did not sign her name onto legislation that would have ended the tax break and closed the loophole.
Just as shes doing now, she was out [t]here every day saying Im going to shut them down, but did not actually use her elected-official power to keep her word, and follow through with the simple act of signing her name onto someone elses bill.
As Politico reports,
When Clinton had a chance to support a 2007 bill that aimed to curb a tax break she publicly decried for hedge-fund and private-equity executives, she failed to sign on.
Clinton said one thing in public, but did another behind closed doors. She attacked Wall Street to voters, but helped them as a senator.
Why?
Because Wall Street executives were the biggest donors to her 2006 Senate campaign and her 2008 presidential campaign.
Clinton got millions from the financial industry while also protecting them she is most assuredly influenced by her Wall Street donors.
Thats one thing right there, per Clintons request but heres even more.
In 2007 and 2008, Clinton did not work with the other senators in Congress to pass a housing bill to stop individual financial players from destroying the economy.
http://www.dailykos.com/stories/2016/2/4/1479904/-Clinton-Last-Night-Name-Anything-Wall-Street-Has-Influenced-Me-On-OK-I-Will
daleanime
(17,796 posts)5. Actually, she's the perfect messenger for change....
if you intend to have none.