We are all supposed to believe that Hillary walked into any speech without a prepared script.

[Luminous Animal]

[Luminous Animal]

1. cough them up Hillary

[NanceGreggs]

2. And exactly WHO asked you to believe that?

[Luminous Animal]

3. Thanks for the kick.

[NanceGreggs]

7. Oh, you are very welcome!

I think OPs like this should get as much exposure as possible.

[Luminous Animal]

9. I agree. Let's see those Goldman Sachs speeches

[NanceGreggs]

12. You're agreeing for the wrong reasons.

I couldn't care less what's in those GS speeches. I think OPs like this should be "kicked" so everyone can see them - especially those who think Bernie's only shot at the nomination is some smoking gun buried in Hillary's GS speech transcripts.

Too bad you don't believe your candidate can win the nomination otherwise.

[Luminous Animal]

14. Me, too! Showing thousands upon hundreds of thousands of thanks for the kick!

You are a peach!

[NanceGreggs]

15. Always happy to see ...

... an OP like this given lots and LOTS of attention!

I'm sure everyone wants to know who said "we are all supposed to believe that Hillary walked into any speech without a prepared script".

Any chance of you explaining exactly who said that, or even promoted the idea?

[Luminous Animal]

16. Thanks again for the kick. You are a peach!

[NanceGreggs]

18. No problem! n/t

[Luminous Animal]

20. Thanks again for the kick. You are a peach!

[msongs]

4. the republican national committee maybe? nt

[Luminous Animal]

5. You don't want to know what she said?

[Ichingcarpenter]

8. I'll sum up the three speeches

First speech summary:

''Cut it out''

So they ask her back again

Second speech summary

''Cut it out I'm a moderate''

Can We have some more mam?

Third Speech summary

''Cut it out'', 911, and Kissinger likes me' and I'm a progressive'

ok....... here's your money

[daleanime]

19. ........

[senz]

10. In every debate she seems quite "readied."

I'm sure it's a big all day production.

[Luminous Animal]

11. You are using sexist language. Delete you post or I delete the OP.

[senz]

13. I don't see the problem but edited it to assuage any worries.

It was descriptive and truthful, not insulting, either. Not, imo, the least bit sexist.

It's been a long night, apparently.

[daleanime]

17. And that the result was worth $250,000.....

But not worth recording.

[catnhatnh]

21. I absolutely believe there is no smoking gun....

...and that IS the smoking gun. I'm betting these speeches are so vanilla and non-specific they will absolutely confirm that Goldman got absolutely nothing of value from the speech and therefore the payments were clearly just corrupt bribes given under cover of payment for services rendered.