Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

AZ Progressive

(3,411 posts)
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 04:39 AM Feb 2016

A Hedge Fund billionaire has "close personal ties" with the Clintons

A billionaire hedge fund kingpin, co-owner of the Milwaukee Bucs and avid high-stakes poker player (for stakes as much as $20,000 a hand) Lasry is among Clinton’s most steadfast Wall Street backers, with close personal ties to her family. He has donated between $100,000 and $250,000 to the Clinton Foundation, hired Chelsea Clinton at his Avenue Capital hedge fund, invested (along with Blankfein) in son-in-law Mezvinsky’s fund and made his corporate jet available to Clinton while she was senator. When Clinton launched her campaign last year, Lasry threw one of the initial fundraisers, sending out an email saying he would “love to try to raise 270” — as in $270,000.

- https://www.yahoo.com/politics/hillarys-financial-armada-233033648.html

Marc Lasry's net worth: $1.9 billion


How can anyone trust Hillary to put the American people above the interests of the billionaires and Wall Street?
30 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A Hedge Fund billionaire has "close personal ties" with the Clintons (Original Post) AZ Progressive Feb 2016 OP
OMG! A billionaire donates money so a charity can help the poorest of the poor! leftofcool Feb 2016 #1
Ahh, to be expected from Hillary supporters AZ Progressive Feb 2016 #2
So says you. leftofcool Feb 2016 #3
Hillary's hypocrisy AZ Progressive Feb 2016 #4
Okay, we get it. You don't like anyone who has money. leftofcool Feb 2016 #9
The Clinton Foundation does great work. Cali_Democrat Feb 2016 #5
Would Hillary hurt him with policies that favor the 99% over the 1%? AZ Progressive Feb 2016 #6
I really don't think Hillary wants to hurt anyone. Cali_Democrat Feb 2016 #7
Hurt their wealth of course AZ Progressive Feb 2016 #8
You actually want to make this guy poorer? Like as an active goal? Recursion Feb 2016 #10
Hillary supporters' logic is amusing AZ Progressive Feb 2016 #11
Do you think all rich people are like that? How about Ben and Jerry, two of Bernie's top supporters? DanTex Feb 2016 #22
BTW, I appreciate all the kicks to the top you guys are giving me of this thread AZ Progressive Feb 2016 #12
Yes. We need to redistribute their wealth so that the rest of us will be better off. reformist2 Feb 2016 #15
We had top tax rates of 70% to 91% during the mid 20th century AZ Progressive Feb 2016 #17
And this particular billionaire agrees with that. He's not the only one. Soros, Steyer, etc. DanTex Feb 2016 #21
Know Thy Enemy - Oligarchs, Corporations, Banks And Their Media Minions And MIC Henchmen cantbeserious Feb 2016 #13
At first I thought it was her son-in-law, but they only live in a $10 million apartment. n/t PonyUp Feb 2016 #14
A ten million dollar apartment? SammyWinstonJack Feb 2016 #29
Here you go: PonyUp Feb 2016 #30
I wonder what Chelsea is worth these days? MrMickeysMom Feb 2016 #16
Soros gave one of her super pacs 6 million or more. Skwmom Feb 2016 #18
A lot of people make the world worse through corporate investments. raouldukelives Feb 2016 #19
You realize that anyone with a 401k or a pension has "corporate investments" right? DanTex Feb 2016 #20
And that's part of the problem Art_from_Ark Feb 2016 #24
What should be done about that? Retirement funds can't remain viable without investing DanTex Feb 2016 #25
Do they realize it. That is the question. raouldukelives Feb 2016 #28
As I remember it, Carnagie said he gave some money away because if he didn't HereSince1628 Feb 2016 #26
Are there any that don't? CharlotteVale Feb 2016 #23
As a Bernie supporter TeddyR Feb 2016 #27
 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
7. I really don't think Hillary wants to hurt anyone.
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 05:14 AM
Feb 2016

I would hope Bernie doesn't want to hurt anyone either.

Deliberately trying to harm people is not cool or progressive in any way.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
10. You actually want to make this guy poorer? Like as an active goal?
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 06:31 AM
Feb 2016

I see making him less wealthy as an unfortunate and often (but not always) avoidable side effect of wanting to make normal Americans wealthier.

AZ Progressive

(3,411 posts)
11. Hillary supporters' logic is amusing
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 06:36 AM
Feb 2016

You really think the rich care about you? They don't want to pay their fair share of taxes and they are a large part of the reason that this country is declining. They have corrupted the political system to make sure that it serves them, not you and the rest of the 99%.

AZ Progressive

(3,411 posts)
12. BTW, I appreciate all the kicks to the top you guys are giving me of this thread
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 06:38 AM
Feb 2016

Helping me to promote it!

reformist2

(9,841 posts)
15. Yes. We need to redistribute their wealth so that the rest of us will be better off.
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 07:10 AM
Feb 2016

Everything that has been done in Washington for the past 30 years has been done to increase the wealth of the 1%. When we go to undo those things to make our lives better, of course their wealth is going to decline. As it should.

AZ Progressive

(3,411 posts)
17. We had top tax rates of 70% to 91% during the mid 20th century
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 07:19 AM
Feb 2016

Especially during the postwar era, and look how great our economy was. And it was at the expense of the rich as in that it kept them from getting much richer.

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
21. And this particular billionaire agrees with that. He's not the only one. Soros, Steyer, etc.
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 09:15 AM
Feb 2016

The "Buffet" rule is named after Warren Buffet. Bill Gates has said taxes on the rich should be higher.

The fact that someone is rich doesn't mean they aren't in favor of higher taxes on the rich.

MrMickeysMom

(20,453 posts)
16. I wonder what Chelsea is worth these days?
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 07:15 AM
Feb 2016

This is a fair question, too. Here we are talking about Wall Street, and there are more than close ties, as it's a family business for the Clintons.

Or, for that matter, how well does her health plan works for maternity leave?

raouldukelives

(5,178 posts)
19. A lot of people make the world worse through corporate investments.
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 09:01 AM
Feb 2016

Then as they age, some develop a conscience for the evil they have wrought upon others and decide to become charitable to ease the stench of death around themselves.

Sadly, they still rely on the same corporate wealth from denying climate change, from rallying for war, from incarcerating the least among us and from sucking them dry when they become ill. They have done all they can to assure nothing ever gets better with the one life they have and then begin to realize it as they get older.

Wealth made from making things worse, I suppose, could be used to try to make things better. But never as good as if they hadn't decided to assist in making things so bad to begin with.

raouldukelives

(5,178 posts)
28. Do they realize it. That is the question.
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 08:26 AM
Feb 2016

As long as they are honest about it, that is half the battle in my eyes.

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
26. As I remember it, Carnagie said he gave some money away because if he didn't
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 09:28 AM
Feb 2016

the common brutes would one-day come and take it -all- away.

I'm really not sure there is any turn toward redemption, but rather a greater sense of vulnerability. When all you have is money, I would expect that throwing money is seen as the solution to every problem.

 

TeddyR

(2,493 posts)
27. As a Bernie supporter
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 09:36 AM
Feb 2016

I find these constant attacks on Hillary's "ties" to Wall Street and billionaires tiresome. Do people think President Obama didn't have "ties" to Wall Street? And whatever you might think Bernie would do if elected, he would not redistribute wealth. This is a country whose economy is based on capitalism, not socialism.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»A Hedge Fund billionaire ...