2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumA Hedge Fund billionaire has "close personal ties" with the Clintons
- https://www.yahoo.com/politics/hillarys-financial-armada-233033648.html
Marc Lasry's net worth: $1.9 billion
How can anyone trust Hillary to put the American people above the interests of the billionaires and Wall Street?
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)AZ Progressive
(3,411 posts)leftofcool
(19,460 posts)AZ Progressive
(3,411 posts)leftofcool
(19,460 posts)Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)This man should be praised.
AZ Progressive
(3,411 posts)Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)I would hope Bernie doesn't want to hurt anyone either.
Deliberately trying to harm people is not cool or progressive in any way.
AZ Progressive
(3,411 posts)Nice try
Recursion
(56,582 posts)I see making him less wealthy as an unfortunate and often (but not always) avoidable side effect of wanting to make normal Americans wealthier.
AZ Progressive
(3,411 posts)You really think the rich care about you? They don't want to pay their fair share of taxes and they are a large part of the reason that this country is declining. They have corrupted the political system to make sure that it serves them, not you and the rest of the 99%.
DanTex
(20,709 posts)AZ Progressive
(3,411 posts)Helping me to promote it!
reformist2
(9,841 posts)Everything that has been done in Washington for the past 30 years has been done to increase the wealth of the 1%. When we go to undo those things to make our lives better, of course their wealth is going to decline. As it should.
AZ Progressive
(3,411 posts)Especially during the postwar era, and look how great our economy was. And it was at the expense of the rich as in that it kept them from getting much richer.
DanTex
(20,709 posts)The "Buffet" rule is named after Warren Buffet. Bill Gates has said taxes on the rich should be higher.
The fact that someone is rich doesn't mean they aren't in favor of higher taxes on the rich.
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
PonyUp
(1,680 posts)SammyWinstonJack
(44,130 posts)PonyUp
(1,680 posts)MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)This is a fair question, too. Here we are talking about Wall Street, and there are more than close ties, as it's a family business for the Clintons.
Or, for that matter, how well does her health plan works for maternity leave?
Skwmom
(12,685 posts)raouldukelives
(5,178 posts)Then as they age, some develop a conscience for the evil they have wrought upon others and decide to become charitable to ease the stench of death around themselves.
Sadly, they still rely on the same corporate wealth from denying climate change, from rallying for war, from incarcerating the least among us and from sucking them dry when they become ill. They have done all they can to assure nothing ever gets better with the one life they have and then begin to realize it as they get older.
Wealth made from making things worse, I suppose, could be used to try to make things better. But never as good as if they hadn't decided to assist in making things so bad to begin with.
DanTex
(20,709 posts)Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)It's just keeping the vicious circle going.
DanTex
(20,709 posts)in stocks.
raouldukelives
(5,178 posts)As long as they are honest about it, that is half the battle in my eyes.
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)the common brutes would one-day come and take it -all- away.
I'm really not sure there is any turn toward redemption, but rather a greater sense of vulnerability. When all you have is money, I would expect that throwing money is seen as the solution to every problem.
CharlotteVale
(2,717 posts)TeddyR
(2,493 posts)I find these constant attacks on Hillary's "ties" to Wall Street and billionaires tiresome. Do people think President Obama didn't have "ties" to Wall Street? And whatever you might think Bernie would do if elected, he would not redistribute wealth. This is a country whose economy is based on capitalism, not socialism.