2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forum"Bernie Sanders: The Political Foresight Champion"
"Bernie Sanders is surging in the boxing match known as the Democratic primary landing political jabs and uppercuts. The other participant in the ring, Hillary Rodham Clinton, is taking the blows and countering with establishment haymakers. Remember, Hillary has done it all: she was first lady, a United States senator, ran for the Democratic nomination in 2008, and most recently, was handpicked by Barack Obama to serve as the secretary of state. And moreover, Hillarys political positions arent that far off from what Bernie is propagating. However, there is one key difference: Bernies political foresight makes Nostradamus look like a Medieval street prophet.
How so? Bernie has the upper hand on Hillary with regard to a few hot button issues: the War in Iraq, the financial crisis and pro-LGBT positions. Lets start with the War in Iraq, a conflict that Bernie opposed from the outset.
I am concerned about the problems of so-called unintended consequences. Who will govern Iraq when Saddam Hussein is removed and what role will the U.S. play in ensuing a civil war that could develop in that country?
Bernie didnt vote to authorize the Bush Administration to conduct operations in Iraq. Instead of pandering to the financial elite by supporting false pretexts for war, conjured up by Saruman Cheney (an incredibly nerdy LOTR reference, I know), Bernie had the mental wherewithal to comprehend the difficulties of controlling a post-invasion Iraq, whereby he predicted the creation of a power vacuum that would foster an environment of extremism.
Years later, Iraq has become a breeding ground for radical jihadists seeking to construct a Muslim caliphate. Thanks to George Dumbya Bush, and his pro-defense inner circle, the Middle East has reached a dangerous crossroads, one between moderate Muslims, and those who seek to distort the Koran to fit their morally backwards religious objectives, such as, oh, you know, banning the breeding of pigeons, as they fly over head and expose their genitals to unsuspecting civilians. Apparently, Middle Eastern pigeons are as well-endowed as Ron Jeremy. Either that or breeders supplement their diets with Cialis
.
But back to my point: Bernies astute argument also sheds light on Americas future role in post-invasion Iraqthe underlying inferences being: 1) how long will the conflict last, 2) the level of engagement required, and 3) the role to which the U.S. will play in dictating domestic Iraqi affairs. Factors the Bush Administration, Republicans and duped Democrats refused or naively disregarded. Bernies cautious calculations and tamed foreign policy objectives demonstrate his lucid political foresight.
The democratic socialist, from the great state of Ben and Jerrys, also predicted the 2008 Financial Crisis in a Congressional hearing on financial bailouts, ten years before the financial collapse. In sum, Bernie Sanders calls out trickle-down economics, wealth inequality, hedging, Federal Reserve bailouts and economic cronyism, and has hinted at these policies culminating in an unsustainable system that would contribute to financial turmoil. Bear in mind, the economy at the tail-end of the previous century was booming, so Bernies statement may have fallen upon deaf ears. Nonetheless, Bernies refusal to mollycoddle the financial elite was a political standpoint that has become mainstream ever since the financial collapse. And while one cant tie Hillary to these policiesas she was the first lady at the timeher husband, with the benefit of hindsight, was perhaps a bit too comfortable with the now faded icon, Alan Greenspan, who created an economic paradigm that justified massive wealth accumulation by financial giants, shady derivatives schemes and white collar gambling on Wall Street. The untouchable Greenspan Ayn Randian unfettered capitalism dream that was fated once again to lead to economic Armageddon. Once again, Bernies political foresight brings credibility to his consistent moral convictions
Incidentally, Bernie, in 1979, wrote about the potential issues associated with the privatization of television networks. One excerpt that stands out is his reference to the TV industrys objectivedue to it being mostly owned by private corporationsof intentionally stupefying American television viewers in order to drive advertising profits. Essentially, according to Bernie, television content that lacked intellectual subject matter would become commonplace: a prediction that has panned out. I mean, have you watched Fox News lately? Viewers of this jingoistic propaganda machine are less informed than individuals who dont watch news at all. Bernies prognosticating is surely eerie, especially when one considers that 90 percent of the American media is owned by six corporations.
Even before the Edward Snowden revelations, Bernie foresaw the ever-encroaching nature of the Patriot Act on the 4th Amendment. After the 9/11 attacks, in an environment rife with insecurity and paranoia, Sanders understood the dangers of granting the federal government Orwellian-esque police powers. Thats why he voted against the bill in 2001. In times of crisis, citizensespecially following events that expose a nations security apparatusare more willing to concede their freedom in exchange for protection. While the Patriot Act may have been well intentioned, the Bush administration ended up employing extra-judicious tactics in implementing it, such as the warrantless wiretapping of American phones. But Bernie highlighted the potential for government overreach and issues with the lack of oversight of government intelligence agencies, and therefore knew that this wasnt necessarily the best approach. He stuck to this conviction when he voted against the reauthorization of the Patriot Act in both 2006 and 2011. In contrast, Clinton voted to implement the Patriot Act in 2001 and for reauthorization in 2006; but, to her credit, she voted against extending the wiretapping provision in 2005. Theres no doubt that Sanderss stances on government surveillance exemplifies his adherence to the liberty-centric tenets of progressivism.
In my opinion, Bernies unwavering backing of LGBT rights draws another distinction between the two Democratic frontrunners. Remember, Hillary Clinton, in the 2008 Democratic Primary, ran on an anti-gay marriage platform, a possible consequence of public sentiment regarding same-sex marriage not hovering at, or over 50 percent a position made out of political convenience, rather than doing whats right. My criticism isnt only confined to Hillary Clinton: Barack Obama played the same my opinion evolved card when he announced his support for same-sex marriage, acting as if they had never favored it in the first place. And while a presidential candidates opinions typically reflect party preferences, Democrats, as a coalition, have supported same-sex marriage by a majority since 2006so why the wait?
On the other hand, Bernie Sanders was in favor of same-sex marriage when it was largely unpopular: he voted against numerous anti-gay marriage measures and received a 100 percent rating from the Human Rights Campaignhe never had to evolve his opinion. Bernie unquestionably recognized marriage as a right that should be granted to all American citizens, regardless of sexual orientation. Public opinion is peripheral to Bernies support of human rights: Understanding the immorality of legally suppressive measures, even if they are supported by a majority, is key to becoming a morally upstanding leader. Bernies acceptance of same-sex marriage is, to some degree, analogous to Civil Rights leaders such as Martin Luther King, as they were able to differentiate between just and unjust laws regardless of restrictive social mores.
Political foresight is a skill limited to a few intuitive politiciansBernie being one of them. The Bernie surge, whether or not it dethrones Clinton, forces Clinton to accept more left-leaning positions, especially in regards to foreign policy, financial markets and civil rights. Moreover, Clinton is substantially benefiting from a strong primary challenge as its preparing her for the grueling and hyper-scrutinized general election. Thankfully, the Democratic nominee will be running against circus clowns, who tend to have the mental capacity of domestic turkeysan animal known to get frightened and, in a state of panic, continuously run into a corner until a turkey mountain is created, which suffocates those stuck on the bottom.
In the end, Bernies heightened political foresight and adherence to moral convictions can set the standard for what Americans expect from their elected leaders: an ability to think critically, and a strong, stable, moral character."
http://thebernreport.com/bernard-bernie-sanders-the-political-foresight-champion/
JudyM
(29,248 posts)Wow, he got that right, too.
This article is a great way of understanding one of the key advantages Bernie brings to the table: deep foresight. He considers the implications of issues outside the whirling spin of congressional politics and public opinion.
Wish I could rec this more than once. Thanks for posting.
flor-de-jasmim
(2,125 posts)At the moment I'm thinking of Hillary's sound bite about "before it was Obamacare, it was Hillarycare", among other things. She is a policy wonk in the sense of grappling with issues (remembering names, legislation, etc.), but with all her experience, her answers should be better. I think she is smart enough not to be entirely comfortable in her skin at times (in the sense that she may be aware of her shortcomings but not know how to present herself in the best light).