2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumIowa party boss holding onto contested vote totals drives car with the license plate ‘HRC 2016’
Shillary needs to release both the vote totals and the speech transcripts. There is a reason she is perceived as dishonest.
http://www.rawstory.com/2016/02/iowa-party-boss-holding-onto-contested-vote-totals-drives-car-with-the-license-plate-hrc-2016/
"The state Democratic Party chair who refuses to release raw vote totals from Mondays razor-thin Iowa caucuses is a longtime Hillary Clinton supporter who even drives a car that officially displays her support for the presidential candidate.
Dr. Andrea Andy McGuire served as co-chairwoman of Clintons 2008 campaign in Iowa, and the Des Moines Register reported the license plate on her Buick Enclave reads: HRC 2016."
JRLeft
(7,010 posts)Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)GoneFishin
(5,217 posts)Ferd Berfel
(3,687 posts)The DNC and DWS are also just as obviously do not believe in democracy. They are afraid of the will of the people. There is no other interpretation of this.
brooklynite
(94,571 posts)Clinton had no role in reporting the vote totals in Iowa. Each district had a Precinct Chair elected by the attendees. It was his/her job to report the numbers. The Clinton Precinct Captain had no more authority or access to data that the Sanders Precinct Captain.
daleanime
(17,796 posts)that you're living the good life. Hope for your continued happiness.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)The article is about the State Party chair, who just happens to support Hillary Clinton to the point she took the time to acquire a personalized license plate for her private vehicle that reads "HRC 2016".
What next? Do you want us to believe HRC stands for Human Rights Commission? I bet you believe us to be that ignorant.
brooklynite
(94,571 posts)...and I'm pointing out the mechanics of the Caucus process: specifically that there's a precinct chair who IS responsible for reporting the results, and Clinton and Sanders precinct captain (watching everything that goes on) who are NOT...
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)While I take exception to the word "Shillary", and the notion the OP overstates Hillary Clinton's role, I'm guessing a few words from Hillary and the State party chair would change her stance.
I would add that I think someone from the statewide apparatus having a license plate that says what hers does goes against the idea that before the primaries the Party should be neutral.
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)Of interest
rurallib
(62,415 posts)it was up to the person who chaired the caucus to report them to the Iowa Democratic Party.
The campaign captains may have reported to their campaigns but not to the party.
We (and yes I was a caucus chair) then mailed all paper work to IDP. Very possible some of that paper work is still in the mail.
EdwardBernays
(3,343 posts)it's about releasing the raw data, is is controlled by a woman with a Hillary vanity plate...
Even the newspaper, which endorsed Hillary in Iowa, is calling on her to do that... and she won't...
Perogie
(687 posts)ignoring the fact that Dr. McGuire is the state party chair in which all precincts report their totals to. She holds all the results (raw data)
The Des Moines Register, the states top newspaper, has called for a complete audit of the Democratic Party caucuses after some of its editorial board members reported chaos and irregularities at polling places.
Dr. McGuire is refusing to release the information. Why? If HRC won then releasing it would only confirm it.
I'm not sure if a caucus has a recount but most states have automatic recount when the vote difference is .25-.5% depending on state. All Sanders wants is to see the count totals that were sent to Dr. McGuire to make sure there wasn't an error in adding up the totals.
Who would not want to make sure the totals were correct when the difference between the two candidates was .2%
Why not just double check the totals and show everyone?
As the Des Moines Register states.....
McGuire knows whats at stake, the Register wrote. Her actions only confirm the suspicions, wild as they might be, of Sanders supporters.
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)It's why the few reasonable Sanders supporters here are horrified at their compatriots most of the time and don't post a lot.
As far as the Iowa Democratic Party "boss", he's supporting the only person who has above a 5% chance to win a general election against the Republicans. Sounds right to me.
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)stevenleser
(32,886 posts)rurallib
(62,415 posts)stevenleser
(32,886 posts)rurallib
(62,415 posts)since I live here I am quite curious.
mhatrw
(10,786 posts)just wondering
jeff47
(26,549 posts)stevenleser
(32,886 posts)jeff47
(26,549 posts)So when you refer to the IA Democratic party boss, who exactly are you referring to?
I eagerly await your bullshit answer spinning it to be Obama.
JRLeft
(7,010 posts)He won't give it to you, Hillary supporters do not care about conflicts at all.
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)of the gender of the person we're discussing.
Btw, your revisionist history of the IWR is shocking and appalling.
Shame on you.
gregcrawford
(2,382 posts)brooklynite
(94,571 posts)gregcrawford
(2,382 posts)... It is the State Democratic Party Chair who's got some 'splainin' to do.
jonestonesusa
(880 posts)Do you support keeping the vote total secret in a contested election, or not?
Do you think that if the Clinton camp joins the Sanders camp and asks that the vote totals be released in the interest of transparency, that the state chair would release the totals?
Those are the core questions.
Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)This is one of the most awkward moments of the night.
jonestonesusa
(880 posts)Lively debate - need to stop watching and go to work! It's great to see them one-on-one!!
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)Fb too
Flying Phoenix
(114 posts)and give both Clinton and Bernie equal split. Blatant, biased support doesn't go a long way, McGuire.
Her career is over.
Baitball Blogger
(46,709 posts)She will probably get a soft place to land in a real estate business.
VulgarPoet
(2,872 posts)eom
bigwillq
(72,790 posts)Baitball Blogger
(46,709 posts)Election fraud?
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)Primaries are run by the States, so election law would govern. Caucuses are run by the parties, so I'm not sure about whether state laws would apply. At the very least she can be publicly shamed as a cheater and crook.
Baitball Blogger
(46,709 posts)LiberalArkie
(15,715 posts)caucus was run in a different method than the Iowa Democratic primary. So if the state Democratic wanted to not allow anyone to see the results I believe it is totally under their control.
It is often strange the level that local party officials will go to get someone elected.In South Arkansas back in the 60's ballot boxes from black precincts would be changed out so that a racist would be sheriff with a racist county judge. In Florida they just debated chads.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)Caucuses are run by the parties themselves.
LiberalArkie
(15,715 posts)caucus had different rules than the Democrats did, thus the state parties themselves made up the rules for them.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)And their own rules for awarding delegates. The number of delegates even differs. So I'm not sure that election fraud in a caucus is a state or federal crime.
LiberalArkie
(15,715 posts)only federal election is the electoral college. Congress can pass laws mandating certain election methods I believe. A friend told me that in Iowa that the party could make a decision to award 2 electors for candidates with last names beginning with a-j and 1 for candidates k-z, it is their decision.
Looking at the Republican primaries it is almost like the big money people are testing to see if it is possible to actually spend enough money to buy a national election. It has been done at the local/state level but I don't think ever proved in a national.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)But I think federal law might cover caucuses in the case of civil rights violations, like if there were caucus precincts that were barring minorities and such. Then the Federal Voting Rights Act would seem to apply even at a caucus run by a political party.
PonyUp
(1,680 posts)Clinton isnt using her maiden name, Rodham, in this campaign, so McGuire has covered up the R with white paint, reported the Huffington Post.
Baitball Blogger
(46,709 posts)At least.
CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)You can't "cover up" one of the letters or numbers on your license plate.
Your issued plate is how law enforcement identifies the car and the owner.
If this is true...what poor judgment.
NowSam
(1,252 posts)That is fervent support. I find it hard to belive that someone with such obsession like fervor would be able to be unbiased. This conflict of interest suggests to me that the Iowa contest was rigged.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)...is exposing the systemic corruption and cheating by the corporatists controlling the Democratic Party. And presiding over this culture of corruption is DWS.
BigBearJohn
(11,410 posts)AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)JudyM
(29,248 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Is this the conclusion of anyone who might have a bumper sticker, etc with any of Sanders campaign logo is wrong.
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)It is the person who was in charge of the freaking Democratic caucus.
You know, someone who is theoretically supposed to be neutral in such contests? Let the best candidate win, and all that?
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Agschmid
(28,749 posts)Same shit different day.
It gets old but it goes on, and on, and on.
This will get so much worse, buckle up its going to be a long ride.
PonyUp
(1,680 posts)Gene Debs
(582 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)deliberately dense. It should stoo.
Gene Debs
(582 posts)zazen
(2,978 posts)JudyM
(29,248 posts)in a big way.
Iowa 2016= Florida 2000.
PonyUp
(1,680 posts)Clinton isnt using her maiden name, Rodham, in this campaign, so McGuire has covered up the R with white paint, reported the Huffington Post.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)PonyUp
(1,680 posts)Response to TheSarcastinator (Original post)
cali This message was self-deleted by its author.
zazen
(2,978 posts)If I'm missing something I apologize.
PonyUp
(1,680 posts)zazen
(2,978 posts)I couldn't believe some of the terms that were used to describe her a few weeks ago when she did seem, as one poster said, to have had some Red Bull while she was waiting to speak. I got slammed for calling out posters who used those words. I agree that they're inappropriate.
"Shill" however means to peddle your wares in an unethical way, right? I think that's pretty gender neutral.
cali
(114,904 posts)oasis
(49,387 posts)campaign to scour each page of the transcripts in search of something to take out of context and spin it into a "Romney 47%" attack.
Kip Humphrey
(4,753 posts)Zorra
(27,670 posts)compels someone to lie, cheat, and steal for the candidate, they need to see a competent therapist.
blackspade
(10,056 posts)HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)...then they have everything to gain by being transparent.
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)Like Debbie, she needs to go.
billhicks76
(5,082 posts)They don't like pointing out truth. Think 1984
malthaussen
(17,195 posts)I'm sure she's motivated only by the highest principles of fair play.
-- Mal
Helen Borg
(3,963 posts)there is potential for fraud. Easy to clear that up, just release the goddamn data.
TBF
(32,060 posts)has worked in the insurance industry and wants to privatize Medicare.
Sienna86
(2,149 posts)If that is in fact her plate.
TBF
(32,060 posts)the list goes on and on. Probably banking on a cabinet position in the new administration.
SoapBox
(18,791 posts)Just the tip of the iceberg...get ready to find this kind of biased, in the pocket CRAP in almost all states.
A good example of why we need this Political Revolution and a good housecleaning across America.
Go Bernie!
We REALLY need you.
gordyfl
(598 posts)"On Monday, Hillary Clinton narrowly won in Iowa, with the final results showing that she beat Bernie Sanders by less than 1 percent. And you thought Bernie was mad at the 1 percent BEFORE." Jimmy Fallon
"Hillary is facing criticism for declaring victory in Iowa prematurely. The final results weren't actually announced till around 1 p.m. on Tuesday, but she declared victory back in April of last year." Jimmy Fallon
"This Sunday is Super Bowl 50, between the Denver Broncos and the Carolina Panthers. Of course it'll be weird when they do the coin toss before the big game, and the winner is still somehow Hillary Clinton." Jimmy Fallon
Helen Borg
(3,963 posts)Could it be because she knew her back was covered? Transparency is needed...
Helen Borg
(3,963 posts)A joke. Sanders' people need to keep bringing this up!
avaistheone1
(14,626 posts)UglyGreed
(7,661 posts)who is responsible for caucus sites having the forms for new caucus participants and those who wish to change political parties? They ran out pretty early on in Iowa CNN reported that night.
noamnety
(20,234 posts)The people running the primaries aren't supposed to be neutral.
Isn't that why we have superdelegates? As an insurance policy for the establishment to protect themselves against the will of the people?
fbc
(1,668 posts)Stretch out that "Establishment democrats are cheating to fraudulently hand Hillary Clinton the nomination" narrative as long as possible.
left-of-center2012
(34,195 posts)Hoppy
(3,595 posts)but the clerk in the motor vehicle department transposed the letters. She could have complained but everyone knows Hillary is for health care reform so why bother?
lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)She, and consequently her campaign, literally doesn't know how to do honest, candid and forthright.