Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

pinebox

(5,761 posts)
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 01:36 PM Feb 2016

Let's quit the bullshit how Hillary is a progressive. She is NOT.

Last edited Fri Feb 5, 2016, 03:24 PM - Edit history (1)

Hillary isn't a progressive.
You want a list?
I shall provide it.

Iraq
TPP
KXL
Voting for a border fence
Saying child migrants should be sent home
Having a melt down as SOS over gender changes of same sex couple
Wall Street donations
Speaking fees
Taking money from weapons deals
Honduras
Comments about nuking Iran
Calling herself a moderate
NAFTA
DOMA
DADT
Opposing gay marriage in New York State
Brownbeck Amendments
Glass-Steagall
No living wage
No free college
No universal health care (ACA coverage gap....ACA will never provide UHC)
Pro arctic drilling
pro fracking
Bankruptcy bill
Libya
Yemen
Syria
Egypt
David Brock
United States-Chile Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act
United States-Singapore Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act
Free trade - Oman agreement
Voted FOR Gitmo. --- Hillary voted against the Byrd ammendment and against a large majority of democrats to reduce Guatanamo funding by $36,000,000. She joined the republican majority against the majority of democrats in supporting Guantanamo.
Pro death penalty
Pro cluster bombing
on and on..........................

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/6/4/1390529/-Hillary-s-voting-record
In fact, in three seperate bills, Hillary broke with democrats to vote in favor of the use of this chemical in US fuel.

Hillary broke with Democrats against ensuring the workers at the Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site would not receive life insurance, health and life insurance benefits when their environmental work was terminated by the republican majority.


Hillary broke ranks with the democrats and voted with the majority of republicans to eliminate the requirement of reusable fuel in US gasoline in 2004.


Hillary voted with republicans for oil drilling in the Gulf of Mexico.


To authorize the State of Virginia to petition for authorization to conduct natural gas exploration and drilling activities in the coastal zone of the State.
Hillary didn't vote




You want more? Ok let's go here.

Hillary outright defended Bill's welfare reform which hurt millions of poor people. Flat out. If that's progressive, FDR had a sex change and now is Margaret Thatcher.

Hillary Clinton often boasts about helping children, but she betrayed them as First Lady
During the debate, Clinton touted her years at the Children's Defense Fund. Here's the truth she didn't talk about

http://www.salon.com/2015/10/15/the_worst_thing_hillary_clinton_has_ever_done/




The only reason and I mean THE ONLY REASON people and special interests donate to campaigns is because they represent them. It doesn't take a mental heavyweight to figure this out. It also don't take a genius to figure out that Hillary's biggest donors are comprised of a few choice areas;

Wall Street
Big Banks
Private prison industry
Big Pharma.
Big military


It is what it is but one thing is for sure, she is NO progressive.

141 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Let's quit the bullshit how Hillary is a progressive. She is NOT. (Original Post) pinebox Feb 2016 OP
K&R - Well said. For crying out loud she said she was a moderate before that was unpopular. EndElectoral Feb 2016 #1
That's quite a list farleftlib Feb 2016 #2
K and R (nt) bigwillq Feb 2016 #3
Wow... TCJ70 Feb 2016 #4
+1 Jarqui Feb 2016 #5
Bernie, Brady Bill! Enough said! leftofcool Feb 2016 #6
Wow, one issue. One - and an issue that many don't think is all that Fawke Em Feb 2016 #16
Wow, one issue. AlbertCat Feb 2016 #52
That is not the Brady Bill, that's PLCAA. However, the Brady Bill has its own problems. n/t JonLeibowitz Feb 2016 #59
Bernie voted correctly, there. Odin2005 Feb 2016 #99
HRC is not only NOT Progressive, She Is Actively Anti-Progressive amborin Feb 2016 #7
Regressive Fuddnik Feb 2016 #29
Missed one FlatBaroque Feb 2016 #8
I intentionally left off a LOT pinebox Feb 2016 #9
Nobody believes this (ther than her blind followers). Le Taz Hot Feb 2016 #10
Reckon she heard me last night Plucketeer Feb 2016 #55
Some Dems evidently don't care. Gregorian Feb 2016 #11
Some dems are conservative RedCappedBandit Feb 2016 #13
Progressive: If the word doesn't fit, you must redefine it. valerief Feb 2016 #12
well said K&R Mbrow Feb 2016 #14
Well Done! K&R Ferd Berfel Feb 2016 #15
Great, great post! Says it all, right there! in_cog_ni_to Feb 2016 #17
K & R !!! WillyT Feb 2016 #18
Of course she is. Always has been. That silly and misleading laundry list and the internet memes DanTex Feb 2016 #19
As ussual, the issue with the TPP and KXL is her lack of good judgement. Bubzer Feb 2016 #22
On TPP, she was right the entire time. Some on the socialist left are opposed to the very idea of DanTex Feb 2016 #25
Tiny fringe... right...nice try. Where's your evidence supporting that? Bubzer Feb 2016 #87
Can you post a link to someone on the "Socialist Left" who opposes fair trade? bvar22 Feb 2016 #89
Ahhh, so it's not just me then. I'm usually a little slow on picking up on instigators. Bubzer Feb 2016 #93
I had the most rabid on Ignore for a month. Yesterday, I wiped my list, bvar22 Feb 2016 #94
I go out of my way to avoid adding people to mine... but I may need to change my policy. Bubzer Feb 2016 #95
That depends on your definition of "fair". DanTex Feb 2016 #96
Spoken like a true Clintonite! bvar22 Feb 2016 #98
Since many feel this country has UglyGreed Feb 2016 #24
Yeah, that gets into the "nobody is progressive" message that came out at the debate last night. DanTex Feb 2016 #26
only Marx and Trotsky qualify, AlbertCat Feb 2016 #58
That's it? That's all you've got? farleftlib Feb 2016 #60
Dan you are not rational on this topic. Nt Logical Feb 2016 #116
Strange thing to say. The OP lists TPP and KXL, both of which Hillary opposes, DanTex Feb 2016 #117
Why was she up here speaking for the two big banks who push the KXL polly7 Feb 2016 #118
She did a lot of speaking engagements, from the totals published it looks like DanTex Feb 2016 #119
No, the majority of her reimbursement was from the two big banks. polly7 Feb 2016 #120
That's actually not true. CNN recently documented this. DanTex Feb 2016 #121
Yes, it is true. polly7 Feb 2016 #122
Reading you daily makes me understand the hillary fans. Nt Logical Feb 2016 #132
Happy to be of service! DanTex Feb 2016 #133
Experience without judgement is worthless pengu Feb 2016 #20
We get it. You guys don't think the first black President is a progressive either. Yawn. nt LexVegas Feb 2016 #21
All black people are progressive? Dawgs Feb 2016 #27
Right because skin color now decides if you're progressive pinebox Feb 2016 #31
You forgot pro-death penalty and pro-cluster bombs. beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #23
added pinebox Feb 2016 #34
Meh. You would be wrong. Hekate Feb 2016 #28
Oh am I? Prove me wrong pinebox Feb 2016 #32
Why bother? HRC's creds have been posted over and over and over and over and over and over..... Hekate Feb 2016 #42
uh huh. Phlem Feb 2016 #46
In other words you have no argument. Ktxsbai pinebox Feb 2016 #69
I have yet to see Ms. Clinton walk a picket line......................................... turbinetree Feb 2016 #30
Exhausting! MuseRider Feb 2016 #33
It's embarrassing how she won't own it. fbc Feb 2016 #35
ok. n/t zappaman Feb 2016 #36
I know I am not alone but when she started going down the list of people who wouldn't be deemed Juicy_Bellows Feb 2016 #37
why all of this agida over a one-word label? DrDan Feb 2016 #38
Manufactured issue? No, not at all pinebox Feb 2016 #40
and Bernie did not weigh in on the issue? DrDan Feb 2016 #45
You miss the point pinebox Feb 2016 #47
I think I shall focus on the issues - but best of luck in your efforts in getting DrDan Feb 2016 #53
These are issues pinebox Feb 2016 #70
... Javaman Feb 2016 #39
here back at ya pinebox Feb 2016 #41
I hope you know I'm agreeing with you, right? nt Javaman Feb 2016 #43
Yes I do XD pinebox Feb 2016 #49
K & R! TIME TO PANIC Feb 2016 #44
Her mask slipped a couple of times last night...horrifying. AzDar Feb 2016 #48
And Sanders opposed Gay Marriage in Vermont dbackjon Feb 2016 #50
link please. navarth Feb 2016 #54
I posted this in the LGBT Forum dbackjon Feb 2016 #56
Saying Sanders opposed gay marriage in Vermont navarth Feb 2016 #64
How is it weak tea? dbackjon Feb 2016 #78
I think the question is being adequately addressed by other posters navarth Feb 2016 #84
Interesting AlbertCat Feb 2016 #65
Obviously not concerned with the gay constituents dbackjon Feb 2016 #79
Obviously not concerned with the gay constituents AlbertCat Feb 2016 #88
Yes I do - and how it is misrepresented. dbackjon Feb 2016 #92
It sounds different from Clinton to me AlbertCat Feb 2016 #97
Oh this BS talking point again pinebox Feb 2016 #71
It is not a fucking BS talking point if it is true dbackjon Feb 2016 #80
I did pinebox Feb 2016 #137
K&R for exposure. eom Betty Karlson Feb 2016 #51
Bookmarking this thread. Thank you. nt kristopher Feb 2016 #57
K&R ReRe Feb 2016 #61
I copied and pasted the list to send to my sister in FL, Duval Feb 2016 #62
Whatever you want to label her or not label her treestar Feb 2016 #63
She's still the best choice for President. AlbertCat Feb 2016 #67
Being a Socialist isn't being a Progressive, SleeplessinSoCal Feb 2016 #66
Ya socialist ...buzz word! Drink everybody! pinebox Feb 2016 #73
Being a Socialist is much more liberal than RoccoR5955 Feb 2016 #104
Asking for free college is fairly Liberal/Socialist in practice. SleeplessinSoCal Feb 2016 #105
I don't think that Capitalism can be saved. RoccoR5955 Feb 2016 #106
OP so nice I'll kick it twice. Juicy_Bellows Feb 2016 #68
POOP TO THIS POST ! And POOP to CRAZY PURITY ! RBInMaine Feb 2016 #72
Yup lots of poop pinebox Feb 2016 #74
Oh noes!11! farleftlib Feb 2016 #75
Ya otherwise known as facts = shit pinebox Feb 2016 #76
This message was self-deleted by its author Don Draper Feb 2016 #77
Well, she has endorsements from progressives like Henry Kissinger. HooptieWagon Feb 2016 #81
This message was self-deleted by its author stopbush Feb 2016 #82
By that train of thought we'll haul out the HRC was once a Republican card pinebox Feb 2016 #86
Lets take a closer look, OK? bvar22 Feb 2016 #90
Hillary is not Bill Yeager29 Feb 2016 #83
You obviously have no idea what you're talking about. Metric System Feb 2016 #103
Is too rjsquirrel Feb 2016 #85
Wow, if I didn't know any better, I'd say she's a right winger. Broward Feb 2016 #91
Please list the Republicans who are pro gay marriage, pro choice, pro union and pro gun control. Metric System Feb 2016 #102
Sure pinebox Feb 2016 #113
K&R. She will always put the 1% first. Always. CharlotteVale Feb 2016 #100
Pro choice. Pro gay. Pro gun control. Pro voting rights. Yep, she's a progressive. Bernie and his Metric System Feb 2016 #101
Yes, we do. Everyone does. You are of course free to disagree. n/t JonLeibowitz Feb 2016 #107
she flip flopped on half those pinebox Feb 2016 #108
Seth Myers: "Hillary said "progressive" 15 times at last night's debate. aikoaiko Feb 2016 #109
lol Good one! pinebox Feb 2016 #112
So who does she think she's fooling? senz Feb 2016 #110
Thanks! pinebox Feb 2016 #111
She's a progressive. kydo Feb 2016 #114
You shot the OP to pieces with this brilliant refutation. Kudos to you, sir, kudos. Gene Debs Feb 2016 #115
Well, lets take a look: bvar22 Feb 2016 #125
One Response - Iraq War Vote = War Hawk - Progressives Promote Peace cantbeserious Feb 2016 #127
This is NOT progressive pinebox Feb 2016 #134
incredible! amborin Mar 2016 #140
By Hillary's definition bush was a progressive. basselope Feb 2016 #123
Great information there, pinebox. sammythecat Feb 2016 #124
We have already changes direction in the worst way. -none Feb 2016 #130
Thank You For Sharing These Truths cantbeserious Feb 2016 #126
how many Hillary supporters have you persuaded with your bullshit rants. See ya after Super Tuesday still_one Feb 2016 #128
How many people has Hillary persuaded to join the Democratic party? pinebox Feb 2016 #131
Since our last discussion where you said you are not even a Democrat, and you align with the greens, still_one Feb 2016 #135
Mad are you pinebox Feb 2016 #138
I am not mad at you, I know exactly who you are still_one Feb 2016 #139
Progressive = New Wave LuvLoogie Feb 2016 #129
Message auto-removed Name removed Feb 2016 #136
kick amborin Mar 2016 #141
 

farleftlib

(2,125 posts)
2. That's quite a list
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 01:42 PM
Feb 2016

Not only is she not progressive, she is a compromised candidate.

The bankruptcy bill also comes to mind. Sorry if I missed on your list. K&R.

Jarqui

(10,125 posts)
5. +1
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 01:53 PM
Feb 2016

I was thinking last night, Sanders is a lot of what he was in the 60s - similar causes and positions.

Then I thought of what Hillary was doing in the mid-late 60s: Goldwater Girl, President of Young Republicans at college, interning for Republicans in Washington, etc. I started to wonder about whether she was like Sanders "similar causes and positions" because she's kind of like a 60s Republican today.

But then I thought of all her flip flops and snapped out of it!

Fawke Em

(11,366 posts)
16. Wow, one issue. One - and an issue that many don't think is all that
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 02:36 PM
Feb 2016

bad once they learn why he voted no.

Allowing people to sue a gun manufacturer for building a gun to do what guns do is kind of silly. You can't sue Ford because your car runs.

Odin2005

(53,521 posts)
99. Bernie voted correctly, there.
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 09:24 PM
Feb 2016

Some of us on the Left don't like establishment authoritarians using tragedies to take away people's rights.

 

pinebox

(5,761 posts)
9. I intentionally left off a LOT
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 02:11 PM
Feb 2016

Otherwise people on mobile devices would have to scroll until tomorrow lol

Le Taz Hot

(22,271 posts)
10. Nobody believes this (ther than her blind followers).
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 02:13 PM
Feb 2016

When she says shit like that she just further ingrains in people's minds how much of a chameleon she is and that she's just a flat-out liar.

 

Plucketeer

(12,882 posts)
55. Reckon she heard me last night
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 04:03 PM
Feb 2016

when I repeatedly was moved to yell "LIAR!" at her image on my TV screen?

Ferd Berfel

(3,687 posts)
15. Well Done! K&R
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 02:36 PM
Feb 2016

Last edited Fri Feb 5, 2016, 03:55 PM - Edit history (1)






Let's also not kid ourselves that Bill Clinton or Obama are Progressives.

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
19. Of course she is. Always has been. That silly and misleading laundry list and the internet memes
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 02:42 PM
Feb 2016

don't change her progressive record and platform. I mean, two of the first three on it are things she's against. You could have at least tried to hide the false information somewhere further down.

She was the 11th most liberal member of the Senate during her tenure there. If you want to winnow down the word "progressive" so that only Marx and Trotsky qualify, suit yourself. But in the real world, she's a progressive.

Bubzer

(4,211 posts)
22. As ussual, the issue with the TPP and KXL is her lack of good judgement.
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 02:54 PM
Feb 2016

Adjusting to be right on the issue doesn't fix the problem that she was wrong on them to begin with. Wrong 45 times with regards to the TPP.

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
25. On TPP, she was right the entire time. Some on the socialist left are opposed to the very idea of
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 02:58 PM
Feb 2016

trade in principle, but outside of that tiny fringe, whether a trade deal is good or not depends on what is in the deal.

Bubzer

(4,211 posts)
87. Tiny fringe... right...nice try. Where's your evidence supporting that?
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 05:39 PM
Feb 2016

I'm learning very quickly you tend to speak as though you think your opinion alone equates to iron clad proof.
You're quickly approaching the status where if you told me the sky were blue, I'd look outside to see if it were true.

bvar22

(39,909 posts)
89. Can you post a link to someone on the "Socialist Left" who opposes fair trade?
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 07:14 PM
Feb 2016

Didn't think so.
You never have any links that back up your fantasies and falsehoods.

Bubzer

(4,211 posts)
93. Ahhh, so it's not just me then. I'm usually a little slow on picking up on instigators.
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 08:12 PM
Feb 2016

That I've noticed DanTex as one, I think, speaks to the level he's reached. I'd say he and Lewbely3 likely have traded notes, but given the utter lack of support links, they probably didn't.

bvar22

(39,909 posts)
94. I had the most rabid on Ignore for a month. Yesterday, I wiped my list,
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 08:17 PM
Feb 2016

and I discovered that the disease has progressed to a late stage of complete (expletive deleted).
So I'm rebuilding my ignore list.

bvar22

(39,909 posts)
98. Spoken like a true Clintonite!
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 09:09 PM
Feb 2016


Still no link...
Oh, poor baby.
You know, if you clap real hard, Tinkerbell will come back to life for you,
but you still won't have a link to you "claims".





Cheers!

UglyGreed

(7,661 posts)
24. Since many feel this country has
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 02:58 PM
Feb 2016

been driven to the right, IMO, number 11 ain't what it used to be......

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
26. Yeah, that gets into the "nobody is progressive" message that came out at the debate last night.
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 02:59 PM
Feb 2016

Like I said, in the real world, Hillary is progressive.

 

AlbertCat

(17,505 posts)
58. only Marx and Trotsky qualify,
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 04:09 PM
Feb 2016

The smell of desperation! The commie meme!

plus

"She was the 11th most liberal member of the Senate during her tenure there."

Are you sure she wasn't the 10th and a half?

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
117. Strange thing to say. The OP lists TPP and KXL, both of which Hillary opposes,
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 01:33 PM
Feb 2016

and you conclude that I'm the one being irrational? Hmm...

polly7

(20,582 posts)
118. Why was she up here speaking for the two big banks who push the KXL
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 01:35 PM
Feb 2016

just before announcing her run? What was she speaking to them on?

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
119. She did a lot of speaking engagements, from the totals published it looks like
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 01:40 PM
Feb 2016

about 5% of her earnings came from banks. Why? I would assume for money, and also she probably enjoys it. The same reasons that thousands of other recognizable leaders in different fields give paid speeches.

polly7

(20,582 posts)
120. No, the majority of her reimbursement was from the two big banks.
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 01:41 PM
Feb 2016

I'm sure she does enjoy the hundreds of thousands of dollars per speech. The question is, why was she taking so much money from backers of the KeystoneXL?

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
121. That's actually not true. CNN recently documented this.
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 01:43 PM
Feb 2016
(CNN)Hillary Clinton and her husband, former President Bill Clinton, combined to earn more than $153 million in paid speeches from 2001 until Hillary Clinton launched her presidential campaign last spring, a CNN analysis shows.

In total, the two gave 729 speeches from February 2001 until May, receiving an average payday of $210,795 for each address. The two also reported at least $7.7 million for at least 39 speeches to big banks, including Goldman Sachs and UBS, with Hillary Clinton, the Democratic 2016 front-runner, collecting at least $1.8 million for at least eight speeches to big banks.

http://www.cnn.com/2016/02/05/politics/hillary-clinton-bill-clinton-paid-speeches/


Jointly, $7.7 million from banks out of a total of $153M, or about 5%. Hillary alone made $1.8M from banks, they don't say what part of the total $153M came from her speeches and not Bill's, but I'd imagine the proportions were about the same.

polly7

(20,582 posts)
122. Yes, it is true.
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 01:48 PM
Feb 2016
WASHINGTON -- Two Canadian banks tightly connected to promoting the controversial Keystone XL pipeline in the United States either fully or partially paid for eight speeches made by former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in the period not long before she announced her campaign for president. Those speeches put more than $1.6 million in the Democratic candidate's pocket.

Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce and TD Bank were both primary sponsors of paid Clinton speeches in 2014 and early 2015, although only the former appears on the financial disclosure form she filed May 15. According to that document, CIBC paid Clinton $150,000 for a speech she gave in Whistler, British Columbia, on Jan. 22, 2015.

Clinton reported that another five speeches she gave across Canada were paid for by tinePublic Inc., a promotional company known for hosting speeches by world leaders and celebrities. Another speech was reported as paid for by the think tank Canada 2020, while yet another speech was reportedly funded by the Vancouver Board of Trade. But a review of invitations, press releases and media reports for those seven other speeches reveals that they, too, were either sponsored by or directly involved the two banks.

Both banks have financial ties to TransCanada, the company behind the Keystone XL pipeline, and have advocated for a massive increase in pipeline capacity, including construction of Keystone. Further, Gordon Giffin, a CIBC board member and onetime U.S. ambassador to Canada, is a former lobbyist for TransCanada and was a contributions bundler for Clinton’s 2008 presidential campaign.


CIBC and TD Bank both have large energy portfolios and have pushed for the U.S. government to approve final construction of the Keystone XL pipeline, which would link the Canadian oil sands in Alberta through the middle of the United States to Texas and the Gulf of Mexico.

Since the Keystone pipeline is being built across national boundaries by a foreign company, TransCanada, it requires approval from the U.S. State Department. While serving as secretary of state, Clinton said that she was “inclined” to approve the pipeline. Since then, she has been mum on the issue, even as environmentalists -- with their major grassroots and money sway in the Democratic Party -- have made stopping the pipeline a priority.


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/05/31/hillary-clinton-speeches-keystone_n_7463108.html

 

pinebox

(5,761 posts)
31. Right because skin color now decides if you're progressive
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 03:19 PM
Feb 2016

Under that frame of mind, Ben Carson, if elected would be a progressive.
BOOM.

Hekate

(90,686 posts)
42. Why bother? HRC's creds have been posted over and over and over and over and over and over.....
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 03:41 PM
Feb 2016

If you don't get it by now, there's nothing I can do to help you.

turbinetree

(24,701 posts)
30. I have yet to see Ms. Clinton walk a picket line.........................................
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 03:13 PM
Feb 2016

Feel the Bern

Honk------------------for a political revolution Bernie 2016


It is about getting a Progressive President, U.S. Supreme Court, Congress, and State and Local Legislatures


Democracy begins with you---------------------tag your it---------------------Sanders to Thom Hartmann


Democracy is not a spectator sport, get involved


Juicy_Bellows

(2,427 posts)
37. I know I am not alone but when she started going down the list of people who wouldn't be deemed
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 03:32 PM
Feb 2016

progressive, I was saying right, right, right, right, well Wellstone we disagree on but he's dead.

Thanks for the post!
KICK.

DrDan

(20,411 posts)
38. why all of this agida over a one-word label?
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 03:33 PM
Feb 2016

Compare the positions of both candidates with respect to the specific issues you care about. Then make your decision.

Get over it. There is nothing to be gained by this continued attention to a manufactured issue.

 

pinebox

(5,761 posts)
40. Manufactured issue? No, not at all
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 03:39 PM
Feb 2016

We're sick of Hillary saying anything to woo voters. It's becoming stupid and insane.
She says she'll fight against Wall Street last night while her surrogates are seated next to who?

Give us a break.

This is just more if her being a weathervane and pandering.

DrDan

(20,411 posts)
45. and Bernie did not weigh in on the issue?
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 03:48 PM
Feb 2016

of course it is a manufactured issue - and a meaningless one.

Look at specific issues and see how each candidate stands.

 

pinebox

(5,761 posts)
47. You miss the point
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 03:52 PM
Feb 2016

Every single issue Hillary has wavered on. Every one.
Sand castle integrity but Bernie is the storm.

Again, this.


DrDan

(20,411 posts)
53. I think I shall focus on the issues - but best of luck in your efforts in getting
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 03:59 PM
Feb 2016

this crucial point resolved

navarth

(5,927 posts)
64. Saying Sanders opposed gay marriage in Vermont
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 04:20 PM
Feb 2016

is a broad brush. I read the article; it's weak tea if you want to use it to paint Bernie with the homophobe brush.

 

dbackjon

(6,578 posts)
78. How is it weak tea?
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 04:52 PM
Feb 2016

The quote is the quote. He opposed Gay Marriage in Vermont. He opposed a Supreme Court Decision mandating it nationwide then as well.

But it is ok to use the same standard to paint Hillary with a homophobe brush?

navarth

(5,927 posts)
84. I think the question is being adequately addressed by other posters
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 05:03 PM
Feb 2016

in this thread and the other.

There's plenty of good things said about Bernie re: this issue in that Time magazine article.

Was he too slow? Perhaps. But nowhere near as slow as Hillary. Want to call them even on gay marriage? Fine. There are numerous other reasons Bernie is the better candidate.

 

AlbertCat

(17,505 posts)
65. Interesting
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 04:22 PM
Feb 2016

“Not right now, not after what we went through,”

and

" the whole issue of marriage is a state issue"


Neither of these are opposition. Qualifying "right now" is not out and out opposition. And actually, it being a state issue made it become a federal issue.

(I don't see how marriage is a state issue myself, but traditionally, it has been)

Like the Brady thing.... it seems he's more concerned with his constituents than anything else.

 

dbackjon

(6,578 posts)
79. Obviously not concerned with the gay constituents
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 04:54 PM
Feb 2016

"Not right now" Same fucking bullshit we heard from ALL the Democrats. Bernie is painted as different, but he is NOT.

"It's a STATE's Issue - if Bernie had his way, I wouldn't be able to get married in two weeks.


CIVIL RIGHTS are NEVER a state's issue.


That is what the Republicans argue to deny civil rights.


 

dbackjon

(6,578 posts)
92. Yes I do - and how it is misrepresented.
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 07:20 PM
Feb 2016

I am thankful for his support, but let's not make it to be more than what it is, and how it is much different than Clinton's

 

dbackjon

(6,578 posts)
80. It is not a fucking BS talking point if it is true
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 04:55 PM
Feb 2016

Pull your head out of your ass and see reality.

ReRe

(10,597 posts)
61. K&R
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 04:17 PM
Feb 2016

pinebox, you need to forward this to the Bernie Campaign right now. And when we start sharing valentines, mine will be one that shows up by your name.

 

Duval

(4,280 posts)
62. I copied and pasted the list to send to my sister in FL,
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 04:17 PM
Feb 2016

who is voting for Hillary, but has NO idea! She said "Well, Bill did so much for the country". I disputed that (NAFTA, etc.). In fact, this her silly argument when it comes time to vote.

 

AlbertCat

(17,505 posts)
67. She's still the best choice for President.
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 04:24 PM
Feb 2016

How about if I label her "Not the best choice for president."


She's not even the safest choice for "nominee".

SleeplessinSoCal

(9,120 posts)
66. Being a Socialist isn't being a Progressive,
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 04:24 PM
Feb 2016

especially in a time that gun control is in question. Armed for the revolution I gather.

 

pinebox

(5,761 posts)
73. Ya socialist ...buzz word! Drink everybody!
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 04:41 PM
Feb 2016

First off it's Democratic Socialist.
Second off, let me try and describe to you what that means with this;

So no, Bernie isn't a socialist, he isn't working to bring back the KGB and no you don't have start building a bunker in your backyard.

I'm curious though since you're so big on the 'socialist" name tag, which of these do you hate?


Let's look at life in countries where Bernie ideal is a big thing shall we? You know, the best countries in the world to live in.



That's some pretty scary stuff right there. I mean the thought that someone working in fast food could actually, well you know, LIVE! The horror!

Now about your gun issue.
Perhaps you can explain this to us?






And yes that is a Hillary campaign ad mailer from when she ran against Obama.

Oops!
 

RoccoR5955

(12,471 posts)
104. Being a Socialist is much more liberal than
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 09:44 PM
Feb 2016

being a Neo-Liberal Capitalist.
Oh, and have I mentioned, Bernie is NOT, I repeat NOT a Socialist. He's a Democratic Socialist.
Watch these videos then tell me the same thing:



SleeplessinSoCal

(9,120 posts)
105. Asking for free college is fairly Liberal/Socialist in practice.
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 09:51 PM
Feb 2016

The debate is whether or not we fix our tax code to properly distribute wealth. In the past that was enough to make for a great economy, unleash potential for entrepreneurship for continuing innovation, a path to wealth, and have a functioning Capitalist system. FDR saved it once before. It can be saved again without losing our national identity.

 

RoccoR5955

(12,471 posts)
106. I don't think that Capitalism can be saved.
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 10:00 PM
Feb 2016

That has been my belief all along, and here's my logic.
Capitalism implies that there is infinite profit to be made, from infinite resources. On a planet with finite resources, many of which we are running short on, this cannot be true. There must be a point in time where we share what resources there are, so they can do the greatest good for the most people. This is not possible under a free market capitalist system. It is nearly impossible in a regulated capitalist system. Under capitalism, people just get too greedy.

 

farleftlib

(2,125 posts)
75. Oh noes!11!
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 04:44 PM
Feb 2016

The all-powerful poop defense, beats all other arguments hands down. Especially when done it all caps.

Response to pinebox (Original post)

 

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)
81. Well, she has endorsements from progressives like Henry Kissinger.
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 04:57 PM
Feb 2016

And there were only 9 non-progressive Senators who were more progressive than she was.
I'm still undecided...if she gets the coveted Dick Cheney progressive endorsement then I'm onboard.

Response to pinebox (Original post)

 

pinebox

(5,761 posts)
86. By that train of thought we'll haul out the HRC was once a Republican card
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 05:07 PM
Feb 2016

Touche.

Reality check time.
Tell us how Hillary is growing the Dem party please? She isn't.

Meanwhile THIS.

bvar22

(39,909 posts)
90. Lets take a closer look, OK?
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 07:17 PM
Feb 2016

* Sanders has supported gay rights since 40 years ago. Clinton and Republicans have not.

* Sanders wants to end the prohibition of marijuana. Clinton & The Republicans do not.

* Sanders wants to end the death penalty. Clinton and Th Republicans do not.

* Sanders wants to raise the minimum wage to $15 an hour. Clinton and the Republicans do not.

* Sanders wants to break up the biggest banks. Clinton and The Republicans do not.

* Sanders voted against the Wall Street bailout. Clinton and the Republicans (and too many "Democrats) did not.

* Sanders introduced legislation to overturn Citizens United. Clinton and The Republicans did not.

* Sanders refuses to accept money from super PACs. Clinton and the Republicans do not.

* Sanders supports a single-payer healthcare system. Clinton and The Republicans do not.

* Sanders refrains from waging personal attacks for political gains. Clinton and The Republicans do not.

* Sanders considers climate change our nation's biggest threat. Clinton and The Republicans do not.

* Sanders opposed the Keystone XL Pipeline since day one. Clinton and the Republicans do not.

* Sanders voted against the Patriot Act. Clinton and the Republicans did not.

* Sanders voted against the war in Iraq. Clinton and The Republicans did not.

* Sanders wants to Raise (or eliminate) the CAP on FICA deductions. Clinton and the Republicans do not.

* Sanders opposes unrestricted "Free Trade". Clinton and the Republican do not.


Hillary sure seems to agree with Republicans a lot.
I don't,
that is why I am a Democrat, and voting for a Democrat....Bernie!

 

Yeager29

(26 posts)
83. Hillary is not Bill
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 05:02 PM
Feb 2016

Nor is she Obama or Biden, no matter how much she tries. What she is...is a lying DINO. A repub in sheep's clothing. A hypocrite. You can't trust a word out of her mouth. OP is spot on.

 

pinebox

(5,761 posts)
113. Sure
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 12:02 PM
Feb 2016

Who are log cabin Republicans?
Republicans for Choice SuperPAC https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republicans_for_Choice---

Susan Collins of Maine
Mark Kirk of Illinois
Lisa Murkowski of Alaska
House[edit]
Charlie Dent of Pennsylvania
Rodney P. Frelinghuysen of New Jersey
Robert Dold Of Illinois
Greg Walden of Oregon

Union-Backed Super PAC Supports Republicans http://www.opensecrets.org/news/2012/10/union-backed-super-pac-supports-rep/

Here Are 3 Gun Control Proposals That Republicans Actually Support http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2015/08/pew-gun-study

I win!
Now what?

Metric System

(6,048 posts)
101. Pro choice. Pro gay. Pro gun control. Pro voting rights. Yep, she's a progressive. Bernie and his
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 09:32 PM
Feb 2016

supporters don't get to decide who's a progressive or not.

aikoaiko

(34,170 posts)
109. Seth Myers: "Hillary said "progressive" 15 times at last night's debate.
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 01:48 AM
Feb 2016

Last edited Sat Feb 6, 2016, 11:58 AM - Edit history (1)

Does she want to be president or Flo?"

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
110. So who does she think she's fooling?
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 03:32 AM
Feb 2016

MSM misinformed voters everywhere and, of course, DU's own Hill supporters.

Excellent OP, pinebox.

kydo

(2,679 posts)
114. She's a progressive.
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 12:14 PM
Feb 2016

She is also a liberal. She was even a liberal when it was a four letter word and when we changed that term to progressive, you know because progressive is a nicer term for liberal as the nutter just refer to liberals as libatards or what ever the insult is. Progressive sounded better and didn't conjure up hippies and dirty feet when spoken in public. Now it is taking a while for the wing-heads to come up with an insulting word for progressive, maybe there are two many letters and they would have to think really hard to do it.

But HRC is a progressive.

bvar22

(39,909 posts)
125. Well, lets take a look:
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 02:46 PM
Feb 2016

* Sanders has supported gay rights since 40 years ago. Clinton and Republicans have not.

* Sanders wants to end the prohibition of marijuana. Clinton & The Republicans do not.

* Sanders wants to end the death penalty. Clinton and Th Republicans do not.

* Sanders wants to raise the minimum wage to $15 an hour. Clinton and the Republicans do not.

* Sanders wants to break up the biggest banks. Clinton and The Republicans do not.

* Sanders voted against the Wall Street bailout. Clinton and the Republicans (and too many "Democrats) did not.

* Sanders introduced legislation to overturn Citizens United. Clinton and The Republicans did not.

* Sanders refuses to accept money from super PACs. Clinton and the Republicans do not.

* Sanders supports a single-payer healthcare system. Clinton and The Republicans do not.

* Sanders refrains from waging personal attacks for political gains. Clinton and The Republicans do not.

* Sanders considers climate change our nation's biggest threat. Clinton and The Republicans do not.

* Sanders opposed the Keystone XL Pipeline since day one. Clinton and the Republicans do not.

* Sanders voted against the Patriot Act. Clinton and the Republicans did not.

* Sanders voted against the war in Iraq. Clinton and The Republicans did not.

* Sanders wants to Raise (or eliminate) the CAP on FICA deductions. Clinton and the Republicans do not.

* Sanders opposes unrestricted "Free Trade". Clinton and the Republican do not.


Hillary sure seems to agree with Republicans a lot on major issues.
That is NOT "Progressive by anyone's definition.

 

basselope

(2,565 posts)
123. By Hillary's definition bush was a progressive.
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 01:52 PM
Feb 2016

She simply uses the word progress.

We had "progress" under bush.. not GOOD progress, but progress.

She isn't a progressive, she is a center right politician, just like her husband, just like Obama.

sammythecat

(3,568 posts)
124. Great information there, pinebox.
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 02:14 PM
Feb 2016

Thanks for doing this, I couldn't have done it. I hope a lot of people read this and learn. This country really needs to change direction in the worst way and Hillary Clinton has no interest in that. She'll keep us on the same shit road we've been on for the last 35 years.

-none

(1,884 posts)
130. We have already changes direction in the worst way.
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 04:30 PM
Feb 2016

Now we need to change direction in the best way.
A good start is to support Bernie Sanders.

 

pinebox

(5,761 posts)
131. How many people has Hillary persuaded to join the Democratic party?
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 07:09 PM
Feb 2016

And yet you can't prove me wrong. Go figure.

Say hi to your Walmart candidate.

still_one

(92,190 posts)
135. Since our last discussion where you said you are not even a Democrat, and you align with the greens,
Sun Feb 7, 2016, 12:37 AM
Feb 2016

Last edited Sun Feb 7, 2016, 01:11 AM - Edit history (1)

I suspect if Hillary wins the nomination, you won't be spending much time here spreading your bullshit around here

Response to pinebox (Original post)

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Let's quit the bullshit h...