Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Fawke Em

(11,366 posts)
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 03:13 PM Feb 2016

Here’s What Hillary Clinton’s Paid Speaking Contract Looks Like

So what exactly does Hillary Clinton ask for when she gives a paid speech, like the ones she gave at Goldman Sachs? A contract for a speech she gave at the University of Nevada Las Vegas provides some answers. The contract was obtained by the Las Vegas Review-Journal in August, through the state public records law.

For that speech in October 2014, Clinton requested two payments of $112,500:




Much, much more at link:

https://theintercept.com/2016/02/05/heres-what-clintons-paid-speaking-contract-looks-like/

(Article find courtesy of a friend we miss. )
64 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Here’s What Hillary Clinton’s Paid Speaking Contract Looks Like (Original Post) Fawke Em Feb 2016 OP
"Recording Clinton’s speech is prohibited" Cheese Sandwich Feb 2016 #1
She has nightmares of a -- Hell Hath No Fury Feb 2016 #7
This one worries me frankly. zentrum Feb 2016 #36
When she spoke at our company it was all over Instagram. Agschmid Feb 2016 #54
Good point. zentrum Feb 2016 #56
Who knows? May have been but that didn't stop us. Agschmid Feb 2016 #57
Glad to hear it! zentrum Feb 2016 #60
Her speeches are her intellectual property, like that of any author. This is standard pnwmom Feb 2016 #43
OK but it looks pretty shady when public officials take millions from Wall Street creeps Cheese Sandwich Feb 2016 #44
Was she a public official then? n/t pnwmom Feb 2016 #46
Revolving door? Cheese Sandwich Feb 2016 #47
So, the answer is no, she wasn't. n/t pnwmom Feb 2016 #50
!!! ??? pangaia Feb 2016 #51
"That's what they offer", is it? arcane1 Feb 2016 #2
Looks like she gave them the corporate discount! Fawke Em Feb 2016 #6
On local CBS news in LA last night, they said that UCLA asked Hillary to lob1 Feb 2016 #9
Yet she tried to pretend the fees were someone else's idea. arcane1 Feb 2016 #11
If Hillary said "It's a nice day", I would fact-check it before I went out. lob1 Feb 2016 #12
So "that's what they offered"? elias49 Feb 2016 #19
So Goldman Sachs pays $225,000... ljm2002 Feb 2016 #21
UCLA shouldn't want her. It's a high quality university! n/t Herman4747 Feb 2016 #35
Which would be paid to the Clinton Foundation. nt pnwmom Feb 2016 #45
She claims ownership Mike__M Feb 2016 #3
she has to look into the fireplace dorkzilla Feb 2016 #31
Duh...I'm so stupid sometimes (n/t) Mike__M Feb 2016 #37
They'll magically turn up somewhere in a couple years, like those Rose Law Firm documents. frylock Feb 2016 #39
What Do We Know About The 'Harry Walker Agency'?.... global1 Feb 2016 #4
Here's their website. Kind of like a concert promoter, but for speakers arcane1 Feb 2016 #5
Mmmmm..hummus... PonyUp Feb 2016 #20
Yet no mention of her on their website. Interesting n/t arcane1 Feb 2016 #24
They scrubbed her page from their website. Must have used a cloth or something. n/t PonyUp Feb 2016 #61
Sounds just like the rock star concert contracts I used to review. Dustlawyer Feb 2016 #32
Aw, geez..John Boenher's on it! whathehell Feb 2016 #52
Doesn't it look evil? Evil! DanTex Feb 2016 #8
No one here has ever seen a speaker or consultant contract before. pnwmom Feb 2016 #41
Scrubbed - Harry Walker wiped link to speaker Hillary Clinton Jarqui Feb 2016 #10
Isn't There A Way Of Finding Scrubbed Pages?....nt global1 Feb 2016 #14
I tried some of the cache links .. gone nt Jarqui Feb 2016 #15
Hmmmmm.... What Are They Hiding.... global1 Feb 2016 #18
About 3 days after Hell freezes over. Fuddnik Feb 2016 #30
Damn. Climate change. Mike__M Feb 2016 #38
Hmmmm - wondering who anonymous is supporting for potus? jillan Feb 2016 #17
If they are supporting Bernie, then NOW is the time to expose anything they might have. stillwaiting Feb 2016 #42
https://archive.org/web/ notadmblnd Feb 2016 #28
Here you go ;) Mother Of Four Feb 2016 #48
When I Clicked On Your Link Here's What I Got.... global1 Feb 2016 #63
Well I hope someone saved it then Mother Of Four Feb 2016 #64
That's... interesting... ljm2002 Feb 2016 #22
She's not available as a speaker right now. MineralMan Feb 2016 #23
Bill's still represented... StandingInLeftField Feb 2016 #29
The scrubbed it good. RoccoR5955 Feb 2016 #34
Scrubbed? Like with a scouring pad or something? frylock Feb 2016 #40
Bravo Joe Shlabotnik Feb 2016 #49
Give me some time.... I'm busy tonight, but I'll check tomorrow. Fawke Em Feb 2016 #58
How can anyone support her with all the shit they keep hiding? Ridiculous. n/t PonyUp Feb 2016 #62
"Clinton requested ..."?? But Hillary said "Well, That's what they offered." nt 99th_Monkey Feb 2016 #13
Another day, another lie n/t arcane1 Feb 2016 #25
K&R And thanks to our friend. nt Live and Learn Feb 2016 #16
Thanks to you Bjornsdotter Feb 2016 #26
What? She has to cover travel expenses with that? Helen Borg Feb 2016 #27
Well, she could make it flying coach and stayin in a Motel 6 like Bernie does, right? whathehell Feb 2016 #53
... ejbr Feb 2016 #33
Oh, I used to LOVE them so much! Martin Gore! Fawke Em Feb 2016 #59
I don't have a problem with her getting paid a lot to give speeches lostnfound Feb 2016 #55
 

Cheese Sandwich

(9,086 posts)
1. "Recording Clinton’s speech is prohibited"
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 03:18 PM
Feb 2016

wtf?

She doesn't understand why people have a problem with that?

 

Hell Hath No Fury

(16,327 posts)
7. She has nightmares of a --
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 03:35 PM
Feb 2016

Romney "47%" moment being splashed across the airwaves if tape existed. And, considering some of her audiences, I can see why she would have been worried.

zentrum

(9,865 posts)
36. This one worries me frankly.
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 05:50 PM
Feb 2016

I mean worries me anew—now that there's a call for transcripts. What's to keep them from "fixing" up the written words? And taking out the problematic words with no recordings to check against?

Were people allowed to take notes? Were they patted down before entering to make sure they didn't have recording devices? —including cell phones?

Agschmid

(28,749 posts)
54. When she spoke at our company it was all over Instagram.
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 07:19 PM
Feb 2016

Including videos of her speaking... So in short "no".

zentrum

(9,865 posts)
60. Glad to hear it!
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 09:15 PM
Feb 2016

I'm sure that will be the case here too. Somewhere….someone….has a record of something from those speeches.

pnwmom

(108,978 posts)
43. Her speeches are her intellectual property, like that of any author. This is standard
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 06:18 PM
Feb 2016

language that helps protect her copyright.

When she made these speeches, she was a private citizen and had as much a right to do so as any citizen.

lob1

(3,820 posts)
9. On local CBS news in LA last night, they said that UCLA asked Hillary to
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 03:40 PM
Feb 2016

give a speech. She said it'd cost $300,000. The university asked if Hillary would give them a discount. She said, "That is with a discount."

 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
11. Yet she tried to pretend the fees were someone else's idea.
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 03:46 PM
Feb 2016

I'm starting to disbelieve every word she says at this point. It's the only rational position to assume she's not being truthful.

ljm2002

(10,751 posts)
21. So Goldman Sachs pays $225,000...
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 04:32 PM
Feb 2016

...and the University pays $300,000 with the special University discount? That's quite a deal.

Reminds me of chocolate rations for some reason...

 

PonyUp

(1,680 posts)
20. Mmmmm..hummus...
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 04:26 PM
Feb 2016

When officials at the University of California at Los Angeles began negotiating a $300,000 speech appearance by Hillary Rodham Clinton, the school had one request: Could we get a reduced rate for public universities?

The answer from Clinton’s representatives: $300,000 is the “special university rate.”

The documents show that Clinton’s representatives at the Harry Walker Agency exerted considerable control over her appearance and managed even the smallest details — from requesting lemon wedges and water on stage to a computer, scanner, and a spread of hummus and crudité in the green room backstage.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/plans-for-ucla-visit-give-rare-glimpse-into-hillary-clintons-paid-speaking-career/2014/11/26/071eb0cc-7593-11e4-bd1b-03009bd3e984_story.html

Dustlawyer

(10,495 posts)
32. Sounds just like the rock star concert contracts I used to review.
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 05:14 PM
Feb 2016

4 oxygen tanks with a special regulator for one, 20 pairs of new Hanes white Boxer briefs, size medium for another.

whathehell

(29,067 posts)
52. Aw, geez..John Boenher's on it!
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 07:13 PM
Feb 2016

Nothing like the 'private rewards" from those 'public service' jobs.

global1

(25,247 posts)
18. Hmmmmm.... What Are They Hiding....
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 04:16 PM
Feb 2016

who are they trying to protect? This keeps getting more interesting. I guess we won't see the transcripts either.

stillwaiting

(3,795 posts)
42. If they are supporting Bernie, then NOW is the time to expose anything they might have.
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 06:16 PM
Feb 2016

Right now.

Of course, a lot has already been exposed about the differences between Hillary and Bernie.


Mother Of Four

(1,716 posts)
64. Well I hope someone saved it then
Sun Feb 7, 2016, 12:37 PM
Feb 2016

The cache must have updated. The page I had was from 2/04 - Just checked all my cache's and nada

Edited to add - There really wasn't much on there besides a description of her credentials. All the links that were embedded were defunct so there was no way to check fees etc. It wouldn't have done a lot of good anyway.

ljm2002

(10,751 posts)
22. That's... interesting...
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 04:36 PM
Feb 2016

...yes it is!

I wonder if anyone downloaded it before it got scrubbed.

It shows that Hillary can be extremely efficient when something really matters to her.

 

RoccoR5955

(12,471 posts)
34. The scrubbed it good.
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 05:29 PM
Feb 2016

I can't even find it on the Wayback Machine. I can usually find most anything there.

Fawke Em

(11,366 posts)
58. Give me some time.... I'm busy tonight, but I'll check tomorrow.
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 08:46 PM
Feb 2016

I'll check back here first to see if someone else found it, but there are ways to do it.

whathehell

(29,067 posts)
53. Well, she could make it flying coach and stayin in a Motel 6 like Bernie does, right?
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 07:16 PM
Feb 2016

Naahhh....I guess not. .

Fawke Em

(11,366 posts)
59. Oh, I used to LOVE them so much! Martin Gore!
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 08:47 PM
Feb 2016

The grabbing hand, grabs all it can. Everything counts in large amounts.

lostnfound

(16,179 posts)
55. I don't have a problem with her getting paid a lot to give speeches
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 07:57 PM
Feb 2016

I have a bit of a problem with getting paid a lot to give speeches in between holding public offices.

Her time is worth a lot. If she flies somewhere, prepares for the speech, pays her travel and assistants, and puts her name on the line as an affiliation with some company or institution.. Well, in power circles those things are worth a lot. Like sports celebrity endorsements. Just having a famous person as a speaker carries certain prestige.

But public servants ought to be held to a higher standard.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Here’s What Hillary Clint...