Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

madamesilverspurs

(15,804 posts)
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 05:25 PM Feb 2016

Paid speeches...

NEWSFLASH: Hillary Clinton did NOT invent paid speeches. Shocking, yes, but there you go. Her fees might be higher than other female speakers, but they’re lower than what many male speakers are paid.

Anyway, there are many reasons why businesses and organizations and universities pay those fees: to get publicity, to enhance credibility, to gain knowledge, for entertainment, etc. For example, Donald Trump gets $1.5million per speaking engagement at “how to get rich” seminars; it's understood that they pay the fee to garner a bit of his expertise, not to secure his obedience to their agendas.

But, according to the highly suggestive OMG conspiracies making the rounds, Hillary Clinton is apparently paid only in exchange for services rendered, a rather snide and cynical way of suggesting transaction in the world’s oldest profession. Wow. And disgustingly disappointing in Democratic party conversation.

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Paid speeches... (Original Post) madamesilverspurs Feb 2016 OP
. beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #1
You mention Trump... TCJ70 Feb 2016 #2
K&R! stonecutter357 Feb 2016 #3
She gave speeches for services rendered or sadoldgirl Feb 2016 #4
I think Sanders got $174 last year to speak at a VFW in Vermont about the nice weather lately. juxtaposed Feb 2016 #5
It seems counterintuitive that any organization would pay The Velveteen Ocelot Feb 2016 #6
Message auto-removed Name removed Feb 2016 #7
Weathervane logic whatchamacallit Feb 2016 #8

TCJ70

(4,387 posts)
2. You mention Trump...
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 05:28 PM
Feb 2016

...but during the Republican debates he accused his opponents of being bought off by him! He admitted money's influence on politics on a national stage, unabashedly.

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,693 posts)
6. It seems counterintuitive that any organization would pay
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 05:33 PM
Feb 2016

a six-figure fee to listen to someone talk for an hour or so without expecting something in return. There are probably plenty of people working in the financial industry who know more about investment banking than Hillary and who would actually provide more useful information, but Goldman Sachs isn't offering them $300K for an hour's talk. That kind of money is used to buy influence, not to buy a speech.

Response to madamesilverspurs (Original post)

whatchamacallit

(15,558 posts)
8. Weathervane logic
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 06:26 PM
Feb 2016

Paid speeches can be ethically acceptable

therefore

Any paid speech on any subject, sponsored by any entity, for any fee, is ethically acceptable.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Paid speeches...