Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumI want to know ...
was Hillary compromised per her voting record in the Senate (regulating the financial industry) by donations from Wall St. and the big banks?
I'm going to google it.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 633 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I want to know ... (Original Post)
cilla4progress
Feb 2016
OP
Are you asking if her votes appear to be influenced by WS? There was a thread about this
WhaTHellsgoingonhere
Feb 2016
#3
No she was not B/C She looked into a mirror and said to herself 'cut it out'!
juxtaposed
Feb 2016
#6
cilla4progress
(24,733 posts)1. Must read.
Paul Krugman: Democrats, Republicans and Wall Street Tycoons
Financial tycoons broke up with Democrats. Now they ? Republicans (or maybe they are just using them with their money):
Democrats, Republicans and Wall Street Tycoons, by Paul Krugman, Commentary, NY Times: Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders had an argument about financial regulation during Tuesdays debate but it wasnt about whether to crack down on banks. Instead, it was about whose plan was tougher. The contrast with Republicans like Jeb Bush or Marco Rubio, who have pledged to reverse even the moderate financial reforms enacted in 2010, couldnt be stronger.
For what its worth, Mrs. Clinton had the better case. ... But is Mrs. Clintons promise to take a tough line on the financial industry credible? Or would she ... return to the finance-friendly, deregulatory policies of the 1990s? ...
To understand the politics of financial reform and regulation, we have to start by acknowledging that there was a time when Wall Street and Democrats got on just fine. Robert Rubin of Goldman Sachs became Bill Clintons most influential economic official; big banks had plenty of political access; and the industry by and large got what it wanted, including repeal of Glass-Steagall.
This cozy relationship was reflected in campaign contributions, with the securities industry splitting its donations more or less evenly between the parties, and hedge funds actually leaning Democratic.
But then came the financial crisis of 2008, and everything changed.
<snip>
http://economistsview.typepad.com/economistsview/2015/10/paul-krugman-democrats-republicans-and-wall-street-tycoons.html
daleanime
(17,796 posts)2. Might be helpful....
WhaTHellsgoingonhere
(5,252 posts)3. Are you asking if her votes appear to be influenced by WS? There was a thread about this
cilla4progress
(24,733 posts)5. Excellent -
thanks!
PS Krugman says there's not much daylight between Bernie's and Hillary's positions going forward.
onecaliberal
(32,861 posts)4. Well, I would think she did nothing to reign them in.
juxtaposed
(2,778 posts)6. No she was not B/C She looked into a mirror and said to herself 'cut it out'!