2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumBernie Sanders: the first non Christian to win a pres primary in u.s.history!!!!!
we made/saw history tonight!!!!!
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Aldo Leopold
(685 posts)Joe the Revelator
(14,915 posts)restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)good for them!
senz
(11,945 posts)because the important thing is to help Bernie win the election, and there are millions of blue collar workers (if that term still applies, given our loss of manufacturing) who have been badly hurt by Reaganomics and DLC/Third Way Dems but who strongly identify as Christians. These people need Bernie as president and will gladly vote for him if they're not spooked by stupid "identity" constraints.
elljay
(1,178 posts)Read any article about Jews on Huffington Post, or RawStory and see how many antisemitic comments there are. An article in HuffPost about Ted Nugent's anti-Jewish screed gets comments about how Jews control the government and financial system and every other noxious stereotype you can imagine. This is from the progressive community. Antisemitism is the one prejudice that is acceptable across the political spectrum.
senz
(11,945 posts)who also identify as Christian.
It had nothing to do with antisemitism. That is a separate issue.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)Huffington Post *used* to be progressive. I know - I had 10,000+ posts there, and a massive amount of followers.
The day Arianna Huffington screwed over the bloggers that made her site what it was back in those days and was paid 115 million for it, while compensating her bloggers nothing (while promising them paid jobs that never happened).
That was the day there was a mass exodus of progressive Huff Po members.
That was the day I signed up here on DU, and I've been here since with no looking back.
HP is not in anyway the progressive hot spot it used to be. Progressives, Liberals and Democrats defected in droves with the AOL debacle. In earlier times, antisemitic statements would have been roundly rebuked and generally earned someone a bad reputation (and loss of followers).
merrily
(45,251 posts)senz
(11,945 posts)You are an unpredictable little sweetie-pie. Glad I met you online.
merrily
(45,251 posts)PyaarRevolution
(814 posts)I like the message that someone like me doesn't HAVE to be Christian to have a chance at the Presidency.
senz
(11,945 posts)We could use some of that wisdom in the White House.
mikehiggins
(5,614 posts)JimDandy
(7,318 posts)But, breaking the status-quo is good enough for now.
TTUBatfan2008
(3,623 posts)But isn't Bernie pretty much a non-practicing Jew? Think I saw that written somewhere.
JimDandy
(7,318 posts)The implication was that he is Jewish by heritage but perhaps secular as to religion. If he is a secular Jew or an actual Atheist I hope he is as forthcoming about that as he is with his political beliefs.
elljay
(1,178 posts)Jewish identity is different from Christianity in that no belief or faith is required to be a Jew, or even to practice Judaism (we are complicated). We are a people, a culture, a lifestyle and a religion. You will find different expressions of being Jewish across our community. Bernie is quite typical of American Jews and we are quite proud of him (at least many of us are - you will never get all of us to agree about anything!)
iandhr
(6,852 posts)"I am proud to be Jewish but I am not particularly religious."
jeff47
(26,549 posts)There's no record of Lincoln attending church.
Jim Lane
(11,175 posts)The election of 1912 was the first in which any states used Presidential primaries, a reform that was championed by the Progressive movement.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)OP was talking about primaries, that poster was talking about the White House.
And the first national primary was in 1831, but it wasn't one of the major parties.
Jim Lane
(11,175 posts)He did attend church services and made religious references in speeches. One can't rule out the possibility that he maintained a false façade for political purposes, but my guess is that he was not an atheist (although holding negative views of many aspects of organized religion).
I do see your point, though, that you were responding to a post about an atheist in the White House, not a non-Christian winning a primary.
As for primaries, 1831 wasn't exactly a national primary in the modern sense. I assume you're referring to this:
Delegates to the national convention were usually selected at state conventions whose own delegates were chosen by district conventions. Sometimes they were dominated by intrigue between political bosses who controlled delegates; the national convention was far from democratic or transparent. Progressive Era reformers looked to the primary election as a way to measure popular opinion of candidates, as opposed to the opinion of the bosses. In 1910, Oregon became the first state to establish a presidential preference primary, which requires delegates to the National Convention to support the winner of the primary at the convention. {from this Wikipedia page}
So I'd still say that no one won a Presidential primary before the 1912 election.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)the Golden Rule and I will attend services. That is very rough from my memory.
JimDandy
(7,318 posts)but he never joined/became a member. Lincoln appears to have believed in God up to a point, or at least the concept of God. He is the closest we ever came to an Atheist president. But there are no documents from him or his contemporaries that assert he was an Atheist or an Anti-theist, and, apparently, Lincoln scholars haven't asserted he was either. When an American who runs as an avowed Atheist or Anti-theist becomes President, then I'll believe the US has fulfilled the separation of church and state at that level.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religious_views_of_Abraham_Lincoln
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=post&forum=1251&pid=1188409
(Those are the top two google results)
ETA I have no scholarly knowledge about Abraham Lincoln only what I learned growing up and what is easily googled.
Docreed2003
(16,858 posts)Lincoln himself paid for a pew, which is preserved today. And the church has one of the few signed copies of the Emancipation Proclimation in their Lincoln Library. Lincoln may have been an atheist/agnostic but there is plenty of proof that he did attend church, at least during his time as president.
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)and even signed the legislation to put "In God We Trust" on US coins (the Coinage Act of 1864).
Feeling the Bern
(3,839 posts)But, as I tell people, if you can give me scientific prove of a higher power, I will get down on my knees right now and pray my ass off!
JimDandy
(7,318 posts)liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)One day my husband who only has one eye told him if God regrew his missing eye ball he would convert. My husband actually does believe in God, just not in any man made religion.
Feeling the Bern
(3,839 posts)Seedersandleechers
(3,044 posts)but I always thought Obama was a closet Atheist.
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)Jarqui
(10,123 posts)margin for a competitive primary. Rachel thought the previous record was +16
Bernie blew it away!
jillan
(39,451 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)senz
(11,945 posts)and yet, he could set this country on a much stronger, more stable long-range financial footing. Everyone would benefit.
TheBlackAdder
(28,189 posts)valerief
(53,235 posts)that, but he's no gawd-is-great guy.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)how many freeper heads will explode if he wins the presidency...
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)valerief
(53,235 posts)He said he was spiritual. Which means nothing.
hopemountain
(3,919 posts)but for those of us who are spiritual and do not follow any church's doctrine it is important. your statement is insensitive and insulting.
valerief
(53,235 posts)hopemountain
(3,919 posts)incorrect and insensitve statement and offering you my perception of said statement. your reply is pure projection.
valerief
(53,235 posts)litlbilly
(2,227 posts)that affects him. That's more religious than an awful lot of church goers.
valerief
(53,235 posts)hopemountain
(3,919 posts)- it is a way of life, perceiving life and other living things and thinking with heart and soul.
valerief
(53,235 posts)pass my bullshit radar. Not gonna change now.
hopemountain
(3,919 posts)and i do understand your perceptions are different. there is no cause for disrespect for differences in one another's. perceptions - including bernie's. not all people are proselytizing assholes, so stop acting as if everyone is going to try to convert you to something.
litlbilly
(2,227 posts)a long ways
hopemountain
(3,919 posts)yes, far beyond time
appalachiablue
(41,131 posts)An authentic, determined and rare person.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)SoapBox
(18,791 posts)moriah
(8,311 posts)That we could see the first woman (which now that Fiorina is out of the race and probably ruined her VP tap chances by sulking over not getting to continue in debates despite her poor performance, I don't mind advocating), or the first non-Christian (because if any of our early Presidents might have been agnostic or atheist, the closest they ever publicly said was agreeing with Deism not being evil) and the first Jewish President....
It's great!
I hope that no matter the battle for the nomination,we all remember that both candidates and our eventual platform will all give a nice mule-kick in the ass to anything or anyone the GOP offers.
vaberella
(24,634 posts)MFM008
(19,808 posts)to beat a methodist in the southern/midwest states.
senz
(11,945 posts)in the race, and I am positive Jesus would agree.
But it is great that we have finally toppled the "Christian" hold on our central democratic process.
mucifer
(23,539 posts)senz
(11,945 posts)and, in fact, did not set out to start a new religion.
This thing the world has been dealing with for two thousand years is not what Jesus intended. Within three or four centuries of his death, his little movement had been thoroughly co-opted by Rome.
But from Mark, Matthew, and Luke, we can get a good idea of what sort of things Jesus did and said. From that, I sincerely believe he'd have nothing but good to say about Bernie Sanders.
(It feels a little funny tonight to be writing this to Snoopy on his dog house. )
elmac
(4,642 posts)since FDR
NowSam
(1,252 posts)Forgive me if I am being insensitive for posing this question: Is it possible that President Obama, with his Historic win, broke all the barriers? Is that why Hillary being a female doesn't have the same wow factor as Obama's victory? I am Jewish but not religious. I am not so impressed with a Jewish man having a victory here as much as this particular person, Bernie Sanders, because of his ideas and his integrity and his career record of consistent caring for the people. He is a man of the people. Here is what I think is significant: I think his age is a real stunner. Is 70 the new 50? Jagger and McCartney might have me believe that! Bernie does too. He was shooting hoops tonight while waiting for the results to come in. So just a few thoughts and a big Thank you to Obama for breaking the barriers for all of us.
senz
(11,945 posts)Maybe we haven't quite pinpointed which ones.
MisterP
(23,730 posts)the bishops would replace the governors
before that it was the Chinese (or the Masons or Italians, I forget right now)
hopemountain
(3,919 posts)president obama certainly has knocked down significant barriers and it has really loosened things up. who would of believed that a democratic socialist with integrity and so much more has just won a primary - i am cannot wait to see what is to come as more voters become involved in the democratic process.
elljay
(1,178 posts)I think that Obama broke some barriers, for some people, but not all. The vehement opposition to him from Republicans makes it clear that a lot of people in this country are still quite racist. And, it has been my unfortunate observation that there are many antisemites in the progressive community, including people of different religions and races. I will believe that all barriers are down when we elect our second black president, and when one's religion, or lack thereof, is a private matter and not at all relevant to a candidacy.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)slipslidingaway
(21,210 posts)we can only hope for a different outcome.
But they are already speaking of a challenger if Sanders is the nominee.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)slipslidingaway
(21,210 posts)he just hammered home on the issues. They can run on other items, we'll focus on the issues for ALL people.
WayBeyondBlue
(86 posts)K, I'm new here. Haven't posted anywhere in forever. Since Bush, prolly. Got the Bern big-time but I remain.. apprehensive about how this whole primary thing will finally work out. Source of apprehension? Take a peek at http://elections.huffingtonpost.com/2016/primaries/2016-02-09#NH-Dem especially the part where it says that Hillary has 15 compared to 13 NH Dem delegates. Yeah, I know that the supers all flocked to HRC but the real question is, will these people overrule the will of NH Dem voters and throw the state to HRC? If so, then I want to discuss a plan for the general.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)the consensus seems to be that they will not override the will of the voters.
they keep pushing it as part of the inevitability meme, which seems to have been blown out of the water tonight.
welcome!
WayBeyondBlue
(86 posts)Good to be back in the discussion.
"Seems" is of concern to me. So fed up with the system protecting itself (Landrew guide us). I'm trying to figure out how to actually act in the eventuality that the supers do thwart the will of the voters, in any measure, come convention day.
Ah, well. Seems the consensus is to think it's all fine. Not to worry. DW-S will uphold the principles of democracy, just like before when she arranged the debate schedule. We'll see.
mucifer
(23,539 posts)lykemike
(25 posts)JFK?
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)nt
lykemike
(25 posts)Catholics aren't Christians, just ask a Christian. Mormons think they're christians too, but are not.
boblgumm
(23 posts)I'll bet any number of presidents were atheists and agnostics. They just had to pretend otherwise. Sanders is one of the first to not pretend. I think genuinely religious people are capable of feeling shame when they do wrong. Many government leaders are acutely shameless. Put another way, do you think Dick Cheney really is afraid of going to Hell? I don't. And I'll tell you a little secret about us Jews. Our atheist ranks are legion.
connecticut yankee
(1,728 posts)John and John Quincy Adams were Unitarians. So was William Howard Taft. Thomas Jefferson may have been. Many Unitarians are atheists and agnostics (I am). I don't know if a Unitarian could be elected President these days, although President Obama was raised as one.
mikehiggins
(5,614 posts)Of course he's from Vermont now, but I'm an emigre to Santa Fe from Queens and I applaud Bernie's achievement.
Feeling the Bern
(3,839 posts)Go Bernie! Go Bernie!
zentrum
(9,865 posts)he's the best Christian of the bunch. I mean real Christianin his values.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Feeling the Bern
(3,839 posts)Let's go to Klienah's deli and have a nosh on half souah pickles and pastrami on rye with that real gud mustahd! Don't fahget the Doctah Brown's!
Sorry, I'm Jewish and born and raised in NY. It just comes out!
Major Hogwash
(17,656 posts)It has taken over 227 years, but finally people are waking up to the idea that politics and religion should be separated from each other, just like corn and mashed potatoes!!!
keithbvadu2
(36,788 posts)Many of our evangelicals say that Mormons (and Catholics) are not Christians.
Franklin and Billy Graham say it.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)but yes, they would probably argue that
HockeyMom
(14,337 posts)the official name of their Religion is the Church of Jesus Christ of Later Day Saints. Of course, if they believe in Jesus, then they are still Christians (same with Catholics) whatever other Christian Sects may say.
keithbvadu2
(36,788 posts)r-a-mormon/
"We need something like what Jerry Falwell did in the 1980s. We need a moral
majoritymade up of Christians, Jews, Mormons, Catholics and many others of faithto
come together to take a stand for our religious freedoms and rights."
Mormons believe that Jesus and Satan are brothers.
Also that God physically came down to earth to impregnate Mary rather than the Holy Ghost.
There seem to be some conflicting beliefs.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)Proud Liberal Dem
(24,412 posts)This is not exactly earth-shattering in the Democratic Party. After all, Lieberman was already previously nominated as VP in 2000. Something like this might be viewed a little more earth-shattering IMHO in the Republican primary, which only nominated their first woman to VP in 2008, 24 years after the Democratic Party did. Congrats to Bernie on his win, however.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)being the first woman to win delegates in a pres election in iowa
every ceiling to crash is a good thing, imo
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)Not the same.
sulphurdunn
(6,891 posts)There have been quite a few presidents without or with at best questionable Christian bonafides.
http://www.theamateurthinker.com/2011/11/meet-the-18-non-christian-presidents/
retrowire
(10,345 posts)keithbvadu2
(36,788 posts)Trump is so comfortable and familiar with his Christianity that he puts money in the Holy Communion.
freebrew
(1,917 posts)back in the day, when Catholics weren't considered 'real' christians...
Bohemianwriter
(978 posts)NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)my guess is that the conservstives care more about someone's religion. its nice to see history made, though. bernie first non christian and first jew, and hillary first woman to win delegates in a pres primary. cool.
tclambert
(11,085 posts)What do they call that, autotheism? (Or is that the worship of Porsches?)
eppur_se_muova
(36,261 posts)You can't spot non-Christians just by looking at them.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)but yes, many like bernie seem to want to be private about it, which i think is better
fun n serious
(4,451 posts)fun n serious
(4,451 posts)restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)czarjak
(11,269 posts)What about Mitt? Mormonism is NOT Christianity.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)its called the church of jesus christ and latter day saints
i will let them decide if they are christian or not, not a bunch of rw southern baptists...
but he probably was the first LDS nominee..