Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Uncle Joe

(58,378 posts)
Fri Feb 12, 2016, 04:45 AM Feb 2016

I thought Bernie had his best debate in regards to foreign policy, he has a much broader

grasp of unintended consequences than Hillary or maybe she just doesn't care.

Bernie brought up how for at least the past half century the United States has been involved in overthrowing governments and not just dictators but democratically elected leaders as in Iran 1953 when we overthrew the democratically elected prime minister Mossadegh.

Of course the Shah came to power and his regime was so brutal committing murder and torture of political opponents not mention creating vast income disparity among his people to such an extent they were driven into fundamentalist religion as an escape which eventually resulted in the Iranian Revolution and the current state of affairs.

I believe if Hillary was in power in 1953 she would've supported that overthrow of Mossadegh just to further U.S. and British oil interests and to hell with democracy.





14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I thought Bernie had his best debate in regards to foreign policy, he has a much broader (Original Post) Uncle Joe Feb 2016 OP
I like someone who looks backwards so they can tackle SamKnause Feb 2016 #1
If you don't have a firm grasp of history, it can lead you to say stupid things Uncle Joe Feb 2016 #2
Exactly. SamKnause Feb 2016 #3
Does it have to be an either or proposition? tk2kewl Feb 2016 #4
No. SamKnause Feb 2016 #5
Huge +1! Enthusiast Feb 2016 #8
You can go back five more years (nt) erlewyne Feb 2016 #6
Kicked and recommended to the Max! Unintended consequences should be our greatest concern. Enthusiast Feb 2016 #7
Thanks for the post, K&R Mbrow Feb 2016 #9
LOL. n/t livetohike Feb 2016 #10
K&R Donkees Feb 2016 #11
absolutely so. His foreign policy thinking is actually very good Cheese Sandwich Feb 2016 #12
On current affairs I wasn't too impressed JonLP24 Feb 2016 #13
Bernie calling for improvement in relations Uncle Joe Feb 2016 #14

SamKnause

(13,108 posts)
1. I like someone who looks backwards so they can tackle
Fri Feb 12, 2016, 04:53 AM
Feb 2016

present day problems, instead of ignoring the mistakes that were made.

To ignore history and facts is a dangerous thing.

The history of Iran is especially important in today's politics.

The Republicans, The Tea Party, and some Democratic politicians can not wait

to attack Iran.

If they succeed, it will lead to WW lll.

Uncle Joe

(58,378 posts)
2. If you don't have a firm grasp of history, it can lead you to say stupid things
Fri Feb 12, 2016, 05:09 AM
Feb 2016

like labeling an entire nation of peoples as your enemy, this is particularly troubling coming from our nation's former top head of state, not very diplomatic to say the least.



I imagine there are some Iranian Americans that didn't feel warm and fuzzy about that declaration either as no doubt they may have family living over there.

You know after I typed that last sentence I decided to google for confirmation and here it is, the ironic thing was listening to Hillary criticize Trump's anti-Muslim language as being dangerous.




Janet Tavakoli
President, Tavakoli Structured Finance

My last name is Iranian. I was born and raised Catholic in the USA to parents of northern European heritage. After I divorced my Iranian (now ex) husband, I kept my last name. Because I was married to an Iranian, I became an automatic citizen of Iran, formerly known as Persia, and for a time, I held dual passports. I lived in Tehran for a year during the period before, during, and after the Islamic Revolution in the late 1970s. If you are going to have dangerous adventures, I highly recommend you do it in your twenties, when you can run six minute miles.

I fled Iran after Khomeini returned and stripped citizens of their civil liberties in the name of the Islamic Revolution. He instituted a form of sharia law and executed former high ranking officials, businessmen, people of the "wrong" religion, homosexuals, intellectuals, and people who owned property coveted by greedy mullahs.

My ex-husband was more optimistic than I that the mullahs would soon step aside and Iran would have a democratic election. He stayed for a time. I returned to the USA and divorced him. He eventually came back to the USA--he is a U.S citizen--remarried, raised a family, and created hundreds of jobs for other U.S. citizens. He is a non-practicing secular Muslim (no one in his family ever prays, their main focus is entrepreneurship), and earned his Ph.D. in engineering (I met him at university) in the USA.

So I was more than a little surprised when Hillary Clinton, after being asked which enemy she was most proud of, declared: "Well, in addition to the NRA, the health insurance companies, the drug companies...the Iranians...probably the Republicans." Iranians. Not say, the so-called Supreme Leader. Iranian Americans are asking Hillary Clinton to clarify, if not apologize for, her comment.

I am no fan of the so-called Iran Deal, and I have written here, at the Huffington Post, that I believe our national narrative foolishly underplays the dark side of fundamentalist Islam. Yet now I find myself in the position of having to push back against the imbalance of Hillary Clinton's statement. Especially because Shayan Mazroei, an innocent Iranian student, was recently falsely accused of being a terrorist and slain in a hate-crime in California. Prosecutors called the perpetrator a "white supremacist gang member." Apparently he not only did not know that Iranians are Aryans--Hollywood doesn't know this either, or at least the makers of the 300 didn't seem to know it--he also believed Iranians seeking advanced education are his enemies.

Janet Tavakoli is the author of Unveiled Threat: A Personal Experience of Fundamentalist Islam and the Roots of Terrorism


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/janet-tavakoli/iranian-americans-ask-hil_b_8302886.html



And to think the corporate media conglomerates are touting Hillary's foreign policy as a plus?

SamKnause

(13,108 posts)
3. Exactly.
Fri Feb 12, 2016, 05:14 AM
Feb 2016

Hillary either has poor judgment, or intentionally backs the disastrous policies of MIC

for personal reasons.

Enthusiast

(50,983 posts)
7. Kicked and recommended to the Max! Unintended consequences should be our greatest concern.
Fri Feb 12, 2016, 07:18 AM
Feb 2016

Because with regard to unintended consequences US intelligence operations have been an utter failure for decades.

Consider the lives and treasure spent in Vietnam. Vietnam being nothing other than an expanded intelligence operation. And for what? How would the world have been better if the USA would have "won" in Vietnam?

See? This is a twisted foreign policy. Steady as she goes and "stay the course" is downright fucking stupid.

Foreign policy and intelligence is being driven by the quest for ever greater profits at the expense of the American people and the people of the world.

Name something good that has come from this Greatest Country in the World's fucking foreign policy since WWII.

 

Cheese Sandwich

(9,086 posts)
12. absolutely so. His foreign policy thinking is actually very good
Fri Feb 12, 2016, 03:08 PM
Feb 2016

You can see it it alot of his older videos from when he was mayor.

JonLP24

(29,322 posts)
13. On current affairs I wasn't too impressed
Sat Feb 13, 2016, 03:38 AM
Feb 2016

He just seemed to give safe answers but not much in-depth talk on the problems or the parties involved and on Syria both seemed to gloss over the topic.

I understand though the strategy is fine, don't want to take a position too controversial but am hopeful he applies his integrity and economic compassion for a humanitarian first foreign policy.


Uncle Joe

(58,378 posts)
14. Bernie calling for improvement in relations
Sat Feb 13, 2016, 04:10 AM
Feb 2016

to Iran (although not overnight) wasn't a safe answer nor was calling for an end to the trade embargo with Cuba.

He also attacked the Republicans for not living up to our humanitarian legacy in turning away refugees, men, women and children living in desperate straits.

I have no doubt that a President Bernie Sanders would first and foremost advocate our national strength foreign policies abroad in lifting up, while promoting compassionate constructive actions vs using destructive and intimidative techniques.

With Hillary I don't believe that will be the case.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»I thought Bernie had his ...