Why Won't Hillary RELEASE THE TRANSCRIPTS?

[AzDar]

We're waiting...

[SamKnause]

1. I think we know the answer to that.

[jehop61]

2. She won't

Because no candidate in history has ever been asked to do so. Too bad for you

[peacebird]

3. Too bad for her. Makes her look even more in the pocket of WallStreet, & less trustworthy

[AzDar]

6. No other candidate has taken so much money from an Industry they're claiming they'll regulate...

Wonder what's in them?

[yourout]

9. No other dem candidate had been stupid enough...

To do what she did when she knew would be running for president.

It was either hubris or complete misjudgment.
Either way it was a terrible mistake.

[UglyGreed]

11. She should lead by

example since she is a progressive who gets things done gosh darn it!!! Take the bull by the horns!!!

[frylock]

13. No candidate in history has made the money she has..

speechifying before the very people that nearly destroyed the world's economy.

[Skwmom]

4. She might after she's had a chance to fix or create them. n/t

[Hoyt]

5. Because it's sort of like Obama's birth certificate. She'll cram them down critics' throats at the

appropriate time.

What do you really expect to find? These were large meeting, including Democrats, waiters and other people with camera and phones. Do you really think as a keynote speaker she drew a pie chart and conspired to divide up the world's wealth?

[AzDar]

10. Righty-O. We should probably just keep "reminding" her until she does, though...

[Octafish]

7. That IS a good question.

Seems to be a lot of talk between "Left" and "Right," Conservatives and Moderates, Tax Cuts and other night/day issues, but not much talk to be heard in Washington over the past four decades when it comes to the interests of the masses -- the urban centers, the working class, the commons -- versus the interests of the very few who've so benefited from 33 years of Trickle Down economics. Certainly no taxes that can't be cut and no wars of choice too far to protect their stuff.

So, perhaps a quick analysis of the texts would reveal a lot of the "We" when talking with the Moneyed Class when making reference to the "Them" as in 99-percent of the country.

[amborin]

8. she must be made to release these

[frylock]

12. tick-tock

[quantass]

14. +1

[msongs]

15. because they're none of your business or not relevant? nt

[PonyUp]

16. Relax. She's looking into it.

http://iwilllookintoit.com/

[Vinca]

17. Did you real the Wall Street Journal article?

She was all gushy over Wall Street (who wouldn't be for $225,000 for an hour long speech) and told them we all caused the financial meltdown and we'd all work to get out of it together. What a crock. Of money.

[NCTraveler]

18. Because she doesn't give a shit about right wing smoke screnes and deflection.

So many want to take her off her progressive message by way of distraction and distortion. Not going to work.

[Lil Missy]

19. because she's smart enough not to walk into a deliberate trap for a witchhunt

[bigwillq]

20. She'll get back to you

Cut it out

[thesquanderer]

21. For the same reason Romney didn't want to release his tax returns. (n/t)