2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHillary snapped at BLM activists: "...then I will only talk to white people..."
And Representative Jeffries says Bernie is dismissive. Thank dog Bernie hasn't said the imperious, dismissive crap that rolls off Hillary's lips.
<snip>
"Respectfully, if that is your position, then I will talk only to white people about how we are going to deal with the very real problems," Clinton snapped. Jones said it's a "form of victim blaming" for Clinton to tell Black Lives Matter what it "needs to do to change white hearts." While Clinton avoided opening up about her personal culpability in America's race problem, that provoked a passionate explanation of how she sees politics:
<snip>
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2015/08/video-hillarys-meeting-with-black-lives-matter.html
valerief
(53,235 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)"All lives matter"
TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)arcane1
(38,613 posts)How convenient.
virgogal
(10,178 posts)I raised my kids to respect all lives and my grandchildren have been raised the same way.
I certainly don't think that "some" lives matter.
frylock
(34,825 posts)nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)and other RW groups. This is why it is so offensive.
Chew on that one please. And I had to explain that to my mom, who is not living in the US by the way.
valerief
(53,235 posts)Forever Ignored Club.
Amimnoch
(4,558 posts)The point is bringing to light that in this country black lives are treated with much less value than everyone else, and this movement is to demonstrate that their lives DO matter, and should matter every bit as much as anyone else.
Police brutality, sanctioned and protected murder by cop, police harassment for those who've committed the crime of driving while black.. These are some of the equalities that BLM is bringing to light.
Statements like "all lives matter" cheapen the argument that is being made. It was a poor choice of words on her part.
She did some redemption and clarification at the 2nd debate when Anderson Cooper asked, but this was not a good comment for her to make.
Odin2005
(53,521 posts)...who made it shit on BLM and Black victims of police brutality.
virgogal
(10,178 posts)It is just a general philosophy of life,not a political statement.
It seems quite simple and white supremacy has nothing to do with it.
Why look for a meaning that isn't even there?
It astonishes me that a simple statement could be considered racist and in anyway be associated with police brutality.
Strange.
cali
(114,904 posts)that there's an unspoken "too" at the end of the phrase "Black Lives Matter (too)
bvar22
(39,909 posts)This is Hillary "listening" to BLM:
WhaTHellsgoingonhere
(5,252 posts)PonyUp
(1,680 posts)Fuddnik
(8,846 posts)Bohemianwriter
(978 posts)senz
(11,945 posts)And the BLM activists were so polite, so nice to her. She acted like the Queen talking to peons.
Bernie would NEVER do that. He respects other people.
Odin2005
(53,521 posts)ALBliberal
(2,340 posts)And O'Malley were blindsided!
CorporatistNation
(2,546 posts)"When I'm President...." Blah Blah Blah!
Odin2005
(53,521 posts)HOLY SHIT!
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)LisaM
(27,806 posts)But this has to be one of the most egregious examples ever.
tk2kewl
(18,133 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)Meanwhile hill fans are flat out lying about pics of Bernie, even AFTER the world renowned photographer who took those photos says that it is absolutely Bernie in those photos.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)Or we can look at the video in the next post, if you'd prefer.
nashville_brook
(20,958 posts)during the campaign, after all the Sanders/Seattle bruhaha.
hardly cherry picking -- HILLarious.
cali
(114,904 posts)Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)TheFarS1de
(1,017 posts)The tone , the wording and the situation was exactly like stated . HC was absolutely horrendous in that discussion .
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)which is not the case here.
Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)Provide context which makes her comments "benign".
Do you want to go with that really? Oh my. It's never ever okay to say that to a black person ever no circumstances makes it right there is no context in which that can be an okay quote.
Iggy Knorr
(247 posts)oasis
(49,381 posts)Didn't work then, won't work now.
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)Hillary: If you disagree with me I will talk only to white people.
That is so messed up.
I honestly don't know what anyone sees in her.
thereismore
(13,326 posts)blows up. Her body language is atrocious. No humility at all.
Prism
(5,815 posts)He's trying so hard to be measured and respectful, and she tries to stomp on him like a bug.
She wasn't listening. She didn't want to listen.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)WhaTHellsgoingonhere
(5,252 posts)Jazz hands are put in someone's face moved up and down to hush them. The finale comes with the finger wagging.
Jazz hands!
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)jonestonesusa
(880 posts)One of many for Ms. ready to lead on day one.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Is someone having a conversation with POC while feeling comfortable doing so. The spin is what is revealing. Very revealing.
Seems some don't get this. Adults talking. White and black. Neither scared to speak. Neither scared of what their next words are. That is called respect. That is called openness. That is called honest.
cali
(114,904 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)In any way. lol. I do see what is clearly patronizing in this. It isn't their conversation.
uhnope
(6,419 posts)...means what you say it means.
I'm glad that, even on the Internet, most people are not so easily duped
cali
(114,904 posts)And it didn't fit in the title line.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)You think we're the only ones who noticed how uncomfortable she was?
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)thanks
thesquanderer
(11,986 posts)I'm a Sanders supporter, but I'll say, good for her. Really, when you look at the entirety of the exchange between them, despite the out-of-context quote, she's actually quite respectful and thoughtful.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)She was intimidated and defensive even though the young guy was going out of his way to be polite and respectful.
Prism
(5,815 posts)If you look at the body language and initial response, you get a very entitled, "How dare you approach the imperial we." And her nodding is so plastered on, she might as well be a bobble head.
But that very last point had an actual point. And I'll give this to her, she was a bit of a grown up addressing a nascent movement. BLM doesn't know where it's going or what it's doing. It's still in the lashing out stage. And she was trying to advise them as far as being structured and targeted. I agree with her there. And I think it applies when you look at it from a pro-Sanders perspective as well. He's just been lashed out at, without context, without direction, without any real idea of where the end game is. And we've (collective) hated that when directed at Sanders. And Clinton points out the problem with that at the end there.
Oh, don't get me wrong. Her attitude is hilariously condescending. But the idea she articulates at the end is not entirely amiss.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)I think by that time they were just so frustrated that they probably didn't even hear her.
She was months behind Bernie and O'Malley when it came to addressing the matter, Campaign Zero was keeping track and last I looked she still wasn't even with Bernie
?format=750w
Prism
(5,815 posts)Every single thing she said up until that point was awful. But then right at the end, she saved it. But by then, who was listening? The previously 3/4 response was so full of entitled assholery, no one cared about the rest.
uhnope
(6,419 posts)Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)thereismore
(13,326 posts)poprocks71
(15 posts)That was absolutely fabulous. He has such an awesome sense of humor. Makes bernie seem much more approachable than hillary
bravenak
(34,648 posts)stonecutter357
(12,697 posts)Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)She had no excuse for cutting them off.
Bernie voluntarily gave the mic to the women in Seattle and let them say everything they wanted.
He only left because he thought letting the seattle BLM women get their message out fully was more important than him talking about Social Security.
It was Bernie who showed true respect to BLM, and did so under fire.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)It simply doesn't give a factual representation of events. Fact is, "interrupting" is your issue. Welcome to adult conversations. The one being referenced was just that.
Do you find interrupting to truly be showing a lack of respect? Hold the line on that one and you will shortly be claiming Sanders is one of the most disrespectful people you have ever seen.
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)She was sending the message "I don't have time to listen to everthing you have to say...Cut to the chase, because there are other things I could be doing that are more important".
And when Bernie jumped in, it was part of a debate. HRC wasn't there to debate BLM...she was supposed to just listen.
Why was that asking so much?
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)uhnope
(6,419 posts)MadDAsHell
(2,067 posts)will ever actually take place.
MisterP
(23,730 posts)closeupready
(29,503 posts)Period.
dinkytron
(568 posts)arcane1
(38,613 posts)She treated the BLM reps like adversaries, not allies.
However, she is apparently the only white person who is allowed to offer BLM suggestions on tactics
Nonhlanhla
(2,074 posts)You are distorting her words. First of all, she did not snap. Second of all, her words were a response and should not be heard in isolation. The basic structure of her sentence is of the "IF this, THEN that" kind.
Quote from https://newrepublic.com/article/124391/yes-she-can:
Jones had earlier said, Respectfully
you dont tell black people what we need to know, and we wont tell you all what you need to do. Clinton fired back, in what was viewed by many as the response of a white liberal forced to reckon with her own behavior. Well, respectfully, if that is your position, then I will talk only to white people about how we are going to deal with
a very real problem.
The New York Times described their interaction as visceral and raw, and Clinton didnt disagree when I asked her about it. It was very affecting to me, she said, because when you are trying to raise consciousness, and you are so passionate about the wrongs that you see, and you want to be part of a movement to call them out and go beyond and try to provide solutions, its important that people listenparticularly people in positions of influence. But, she added, she was concerned the grassroots energy of BLM would not result in actual change. I am running for office because I believe politics really matters, she said. And it matters because weve got to harness the energy of people, organize them, mobilize them, politicize them, to bring about changes from the local level to the national level. End quote.
The conversation was about drug incarceration. Hillary had consented to speak to some BLM activists after an event, and the whole conversation was raw and honest. Her response was not that she will IN FACT talk only to white people, but that if BLM activists want her to act politically to help them achieve greater racial justice, they have to TALK to her, and not refuse to talk. Because she does want to solve the problem, and she's going to be talking to anyone and listening to anyone who is willing to participate in the conversation.
uhnope
(6,419 posts)retrowire
(10,345 posts)Only talking to white people? That's a statement that outright excludes those who are seeking a solution.
The statement basically infers that "You sit at that table, and I'll speak with adults"
It's rude and exclusive. Terrible.
closeupready
(29,503 posts)On the face of it, she's saying "I have ZERO interest in listening to you. YOU listen to ME, BUSTER!"
Nonhlanhla
(2,074 posts)You are misreading her because it fits your pre-existing idea of who Hillary is. She's inviting them to be part of the conversation. She's saying that the conversation on how to deal with this problem, will continue, with or without them, and that they should talk to her if they don't want only white people to be part of the conversation.
retrowire
(10,345 posts)no?
then it's an exclusive comment.
Nonhlanhla
(2,074 posts)That is of course your prerogative.
retrowire
(10,345 posts)Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)Why did she feel entitled to interrupt them and get all "cut to the chase" about it?
Bernie let the women in Seattle say everything they wanted to say. He voluntarily turned over the mic to them and he didn't have to do that.
uhnope
(6,419 posts)I'm not a supporter but in context HRC was saying, to paraphrase, if POC activists would start to refuse to talk to her/white Americans, she & white America would end up only talking to other white people.
Shame on you for taking it out of context like that. No surprise though, since division & false representation are a mainstay on DU.
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)robbob
(3,528 posts)like, for example: "Well, if BLM refuses to talk with us to help us find solutions to these problems then it will end up just being a bunch of white people talking about problems they can't fully understand. And that would be wrong and unproductive".
See? Not that hard. Part of Hillaries lack of appeal stems from her inability to find the right tone and choose the right words. Not a minor flaw when one is running for POTUS.
uhnope
(6,419 posts)Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)Duval
(4,280 posts)Don't know what we'd do without you cali.
TheFarS1de
(1,017 posts)HC was simply waiting for her speaking fee money and the other group didn't know there was a fee involved .
captainarizona
(363 posts)John Lewis said he didn't meet bernie in the 1960's at washington march or selma ;but did meet hillary in the 1970's. Mr. Lewis couldn't have met hillary rodham in the 1960's as she was for goldwater when he voted against the civil rights bill!
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)... you're trying to make me laugh.
cali
(114,904 posts)I seem to be doing just fine, nurse. No one seems to pay much attention to what you have to say.
loyalsister
(13,390 posts)jtuck004
(15,882 posts)>Jones said it's a "form of victim blaming" for Clinton to tell Black Lives Matter what it "needs to do to change white hearts."< Well of course it's victim blaming.
You are talking to a Jedi knight of victim blaming.
The ones who need to change are the white folks. He was and is correct.
azmom
(5,208 posts)Was it's a white problem, and got all defensive.
Loudestlib
(980 posts)[url=https://imgflip.com/i/z3ji2][img][/img][/url][url=https://imgflip.com/memegenerator]via Imgflip Meme Maker[/url]
amborin
(16,631 posts)Uncle Joe
(58,355 posts)Thanks for the thread, cali.
Horus T Light
(12 posts)Really, cali, an out of context quote from a questionable source. I know this footage and wrote about this interaction a year ago. the Sanders camp is doing the GOP's work for them. I fail to see how Hillary has anything to do with the act of 94. As I said, look at the history of how this got passed, who wrote this bill, and what did we get to pass because of it. Remember, some have the speed and the right combinations, but if you can't take the punches it don't mean a thing! Hillary2016!
[link:http://www.politicususa.com/2016/02/08/fighter-hillary-clinton-blasts-every-republican-candidate-for-being-anti-woman.html|
cali
(114,904 posts)And how the fuck is that out of context or from a questionable source. No and no.
Thanks for the kick.
Bye bye
Needs to be seen.
Hekate
(90,674 posts)JURY: This is scarcely harsh.
cali
(114,904 posts)that is in your view of it.
Bohemianwriter
(978 posts)to solve problems in disenfranchised African American communities that was caused by her and her husband's policies.
Isn't that special?
ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)then she'll only be talking to white people about these issues (I'm not sure why yellow, brown, and red people are left out here).
I've had a lot to drink tonight, but that was my interpretation of the video posted in this tread.