2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHow the #$#% did getting the SC vacancy filled become BERNIE'S responsibility?
This was the meme of the day from the HRC right...but, really? Seriously?
It's all on BERNIE to get this done?
And it somehow proves he can't ever do anything if there isn't a confirmation before E-Day?
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)TheBlackAdder
(28,211 posts)TDale313
(7,820 posts)It comes down to the same thing they've been screaming from the start. "Not good enough, Bernie" Doesn't matter what he does, they'll keep moving the goalposts and setting ridiculous standards and then attack him for not meeting them.
SoLeftIAmRight
(4,883 posts)But the meme will be long gone.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)He's one vote of a hundred when it comes to this matter.
POTUS will nominate his choice, as the Constitution provides for, "in due time."
uponit7771
(90,359 posts)cui bono
(19,926 posts)cuz he's making Hillary look bad.
.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)give em a break. It's the best they can do, right now.
Lorien
(31,935 posts)ANYTHING but the issues!
840high
(17,196 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)It's a preemptive NOT GOOD ENOUGH BERNIE strike.
fried eggs
(910 posts)Single payer in Vermont wasn't his job either! We won't know what he can do until we elect him.
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)in the legislatures of their respective states.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Honestly this is why no one takes your questions seriously, you obviously don't know the difference between being a governor and being a US senator.
No wonder you expect him to force Obama's nominee through the Senate.
PonyUp
(1,680 posts)Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)bigtree
(86,005 posts)...but Hillary put the hat on republicans tonight:
Hillary's tweets to Senate Republicans on SCOTUS tonight: 'POTUS will do his job. Do yours'
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511245400#post3
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)Waiting For Everyman
(9,385 posts)If so, I haven't heard about it. Obama doesn't need Bernie to ask us. That's a pretty lame assertion.
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)You can't win because the rules are rigged.
Waiting For Everyman
(9,385 posts)I'm sure he'd be met with a ton of resentment rather than thanks.
treestar
(82,383 posts)I thought this was the ultimate Yes We Can, we are going to have a revolution! The game is rigged and that's why we need one.
treestar
(82,383 posts)not revolutionary enough, why would the Rising People depend upon him?
Waiting For Everyman
(9,385 posts)He can ask for our help, or get it done himself. Last time I checked, he's the one who's POTUS, not me, and not grassroots voters, and certainly not Bernie.
treestar
(82,383 posts)why not help Obama as you would help Bernie, for starters, and don't you want as liberal a justice as possible - so why not harness Bernie's revolution to that end? It's like you would rather let Obama appoint some Third Way Corporatist and complain about it through Bernie's term, rather than harness the power the of revolution to get a true revolutionary.
Waiting For Everyman
(9,385 posts)and he's the one making the nomination so how good or bad it is, is up to him. He was the one elected to make the choices last time, and he's the one who will make it.
The difference is, Obama doesn't care what we think or want, whereas President Sanders probably will. I don't think Pres. Sanders will tell us to go away the week he's inaugurated. On the contrary. I think Sanders knows how to use the power of numbers. That's the revolution.
Hekate
(90,773 posts)....this message is HAMMERED home on this BOARD!
He can! He must!
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)It's silly to put this on Bernie when nobody's even going to be picked anytime soon.
daleanime
(17,796 posts)Their warm-ups right now.
Hekate
(90,773 posts)...the Movement he has started that SURELY this huge task can be accomplished.
It's not silly, it's not. How can you say that?
treestar
(82,383 posts)If you are serious about this revolution, it makes no sense to go oh well it's not bernie's job. Bernie appointed himself leader of the Revolution so of course it's his job! By the same token that the revolutionaries can get 15 minimum wage they can get a revolutionary justice rather than just let Obama appoint some corporatist. Then you'll complain about that corporatist all through Bernie's term. Why suffer? You'd rather do that that start the revolution?
The most cynical, ridiculous and ugly ass post of the day ...
One might wonder if you dream of a better life, or if you're squandered all your dreams within a cloud of self loathing ...
I've decided to stop wondering, and put this lost soul out to pasture ...
Say goodbye ... Nihilistic cynicism is not my thing, and it sure as FUCK isn't Bernie's thing ...
Don't worry - we'll make sure your grandchildren are taken care of, in spite of your ugly cynicism ...
Bernie doesn't care how angry and mean you are ...
treestar
(82,383 posts)Why sit there and let some corporatist have a seat for a justice who will be there throughout Bernie's term? The Bernie supporters are proving they are just having fun with us and are not serious.
And they still won't consider a single Senate seat for Congressional seat for a campaign to get a real progressive to replace the current occupant. It's all on Bernie anyway.
Hydra
(14,459 posts)Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)7wo7rees
(5,128 posts)Right?
bowens43
(16,064 posts)RBInMaine
(13,570 posts)Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)It's silly that you guys are this obsessed with trying to discredit Bern. Nothing bad at all has come from his candidacy.
And you have to reason to imply that Bernie won't be in the thick of the confirmation fight when the president does finally nominate somebody, which won't even be happening for several weeks now.
Empowerer
(3,900 posts)uponit7771
(90,359 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)Where are they? Don't they want a revolutionary justice? Aren't they about to start a revolution? This justice will be on the bench Bernie's whole term.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)The election has not even happened yet.
virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)7wo7rees
(5,128 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)I mean besides yelling at everyone else to do something.
notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)Even questioned her mental stability.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)What an odd phenomenon.
Matt_in_STL
(1,446 posts)That would really explain a lot.
Android3.14
(5,402 posts)Could you please change your name? Your embarrassing the rest of us Mainers.
"You have the God-given right to kick the government around - don't hesitate to do so." - Edmund_Muskie
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)LondonReign2
(5,213 posts)Seriously, are all Hillary supporters as devoid of logic as this?
frylock
(34,825 posts)7wo7rees
(5,128 posts)Take cover! Incoming!!
LonePirate
(13,431 posts)Every one of us needs to contact our senators and demand a vote on Obama's SCOTUS nominee. This is a task for everyone and not just for a single candidate.
Vinca
(50,302 posts)Maybe that will get funneled to Drudge today. LOL.
Empowerer
(3,900 posts)Last edited Tue Feb 16, 2016, 12:58 PM - Edit history (1)
Let someone else do it.
It's the President's responsibility.
He's not on the Judiciary Committee.
He's just a lowly Senator, just one of 100. Why are you picking on him when there are 99 other Senators?
He'll promises to vote for the nominee when McConnell gives him permission, but in the meantime, he's just a Senator, so what can he do?
He's too busy trying to make himself President - THEN he'll have all the time in the world to lead the revolution. But he can't do anything now - it's even too much to tell his millions supporters to do anything because it's not their responsibility and besides, they need to stay fresh for the revolution.
He may think about doing it if the President picks someone that Bernie himself would have picked but only if the President asks him real nice.
And, of course, Hillary...
Skwmom
(12,685 posts)Hekate
(90,773 posts)I'm CERTAIN that after all of his years in the US SENATE, he can PULL TOGETHER a COALITION and get this job DONE!
I await events with bated breath. ("Breathing that is subdued because of some emotion or difficulty." The other spelling is fishy.)
But as to Biden, the Vice President has zero to do with this process except as he might consult with the President. It all goes on in the Senate, with Senators, once the President sends down a name.
Skwmom
(12,685 posts)Hekate
(90,773 posts)...a HUGE opportunity to use his powers of persuasion and moral authority to sway his fellows on this lifetime appointment. What are all you folks thinking? He doesn't have to leave the campaign trail -- he just has to pick up the phone or start the Twitter tree or whatever it is the millenials do these days to send out the word to the masses -- and in this case, it's only 99 other Senators.
He can! He must!
kristopher
(29,798 posts)LWolf
(46,179 posts)the fiction wheel; cherokeeprogressive should add it:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511244661
JackRiddler
(24,979 posts)Arazi
(6,829 posts)And this nomination selection.
I just hope Obama doesn't disappoint by selecting a moderate rightward leaning candidate.
If he selects a moderate all bets are off.
You can't have it both ways - Bernie Sanders' message is fuck the Establishment and the entrenched special interests. Then you want to turn around and expect his supporters to push for a centrist establishment nominee?
Nope
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)That absolves Sanders of any responsibility here.
SheenaR
(2,052 posts)It is the meme of the day
uponit7771
(90,359 posts)... and not just talk the talk
PonyUp
(1,680 posts)Gothmog
(145,489 posts)Sanders is claiming that he has mobilized millions and millions of new voters and these new voters will enable him to force the GOP to (1) adopt a $15 per hour minimum wage, (ii) adopt a single payer health care system and (iii) increase taxes on the 1%. If this revolution is real, then it should be a simple matter for Sanders to get President Obama's nominee to SCOTUS approved.
If the Sanders revolution is not up to this simple task, then how will the Sanders revolution accomplish anything if Sander is elected?
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)uponit7771
(90,359 posts)azurnoir
(45,850 posts)uponit7771
(90,359 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)RIGHT FUCKING NOW!
uponit7771
(90,359 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)libdem4life
(13,877 posts)" If this revolution is real, then it should be a simple matter for Sanders to get President Obama's nominee to SCOTUS approved." Could you provide A NAME or A PERSON?
Newsflash...it is a tad early...it's PBOs move FIRST.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)I feel your pain (picture me biting my lip).
Gothmog
(145,489 posts)The whole premise of the Sanders' campaign is that he can promise things that are impossible to deliver due to the revolution involving millions and millions of voters who will force the GOP to be reasonable. Without this revolution, then most of Sanders' platform is not realistic
If Sanders wants to prove that his revolution is real and exists, then he needs to help get Obama's nominee confirmed. Otherwise, people may doubt whether Sanders can deliver on the rest of his promises
To date, these millions and millions of voters have not shown up.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)In addition, both members of the Senate and the President have very specific sworn duties to carry out in regard to the naming of a new Justice. For any Senator to declare in advance of having heard who the nominee is that they are going to support whomever and fight like mad for whoever would be very much a fucking over of the duty they swore to.
The President nominates, the Senate advises and consents. That's how it works. Can't advise or consent to an unknown nominee. And it is the duty of a Senator to carry out that function, not to announce they will replace their own judgement with that of any President.
The Senate has protocols and by laws and a process that will be followed. Nominee first goes to the Judiciary Committee, until they put the nomination on the floor there is no need and in fact no actual authority to announce support for that nominee.
Gothmog
(145,489 posts)Sanders is proposing many programs that have no chance of passing in the real world based on the concept that his revolution will force the Congressional republicans to become reasonable. According to Sanders, this revolution will involve millions and millions of new voters who will force the GOP to be reasonable.
~ Sen. Bernie Sanders
That means that millions of people need to come out and so far there are fewer votes in Iowa and NH in 2016 than compared to 2008. If Sanders wants to prove that his revolution is real, then use this revolution to help confirm President Obama's nominee to replace Scalia
The disingenuousness here is amazing!
WhiteTara
(29,721 posts)Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)of the United States. It would be insanely improper for any Senator to declare prior to a nomination that they intended to support and 'fight for' the unknown nominee. It would also be political suicide for anyone running for President to make such a declaration.
sadoldgirl
(3,431 posts)candidate, who gets things done"?
If you are so sure of her capability,
why does she not get it done?
treestar
(82,383 posts)to those who insist Bernie is leading a revolution. Why would he not want to get involved? Sit back and let corporatist Obama pick someone? LOL. It's a challenge. If there's going to be a REVOLUTION it could as well start now. What kind of REVOLUTION waits to be handed the power of the executive office? Is the revolution going to do away with the SCOTUS? If not, then it is in Bernie's interests to make sure the seat is held by a REVOLUTIONARY. If Bernie's will is the will of the people, why not? I find it hilarious that after seeing all those posts of "No we can't," suddenly, Bernie can't and is not responsible. Let some Third Wayer be on the court, as it is President Obama's responsibility. Actually it would not be a surprise to see claims Obama owes Bernie. But it's only Bernie who can inspire the REVOLUTION! Why have that Third Wayer on the court for all of Bernie's terms of office?
KingFlorez
(12,689 posts)Apparently, the Republicans love him and respect him, so his word should count for a lot.
And if the revolution is real, his supporters making phone calls should have flipped enough Senators to force a vote on a potential nominee.
Jarqui
(10,130 posts)Autumn
(45,120 posts)And that was cemented when Hillary's lead started blowing south a month or so ago. And it's hard to find fault with his record. At least that's what I see,
JackRiddler
(24,979 posts)And they can't think of a different line of attack, at least not one they can use (they can of course think of things like "dirty commie!" but either they've figured out that's not usable or they're saving it for nuclear war day).
But this is just about the dumbest and least effective thing yet. Like, the whole world after Scalia's death is wondering this, right? Everyone is thinking, if the Republicans seriously try to obstruct any appointment, how is this going to be the fault of... Sanders! There's no other intervening thought. There couldn't be, of course, because no logic can possibly get you there. It's just the most non-sequitur and irrelevant thing thinkable.
And the way this extremely stupid and weeeeeaaaaak approach is brought by multiple threads at the same time is interesting. For showing coordination, obviously, but also for indicating that someone is seriously eating up their own shit. They believe this works!
azmom
(5,208 posts)This stupidity.
I'm not kidding Maddie start the revolution NOW!
Aerows
(39,961 posts)It's his fault because he is responsible for Hillary losing the Democratic Primary, even though he hasn't won it yet. Since it looks like he might win,
BERNIE IS THE PERSONIFICATION OF EVIL
He is the SATAN standing in the way of Hillary Clinton doing her God-given and predestined duty of being the first female President of the United States.
She will not be thwarted again "waves finger in the air in a blender like motion."
/end
I don't know how that particular bit of "Must Champion SC Justice Nominee" craw-sticking happened, but it's actually kind of humorous at this point, considering that there isn't one.
noamnety
(20,234 posts)1. Can you control the entire senate composed mainly of republicans enough to make them to do your bidding? No? UNELECTABLE!!!!!*
*If your name is Bernie, otherwise, proceed to question #2.
2. Can you manage to control your own behavior just enough to keep Top Secret Info on the Top Secret server that is provided to you free of charge? No? Ehhhh, no big deal, that's a really really hard one.
ladjf
(17,320 posts)In an earlier OP, he yapped with me for several posts when I took the same position as you.
My feeling is that those who are advocating that Bernie should jump in and lead the charge to get a new appointee, are actually
proposing what would be a trap. If Bernie started splitting his time between leading the SC appointee nomination and the campaign he would likely be able to accomplish either.
TBF
(32,085 posts)and I promise it will be a good appointment.
Chichiri
(4,667 posts)Bernie not being able to get things done is one of our key issues. He's not obligated to facilitate the SCOTUS nominee, but if he did so, it would bring a LOT of people over to his side.
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)There was never any reason for any of you to imply that Bernie has to be MADE to be involved in it.
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)Everyone knows Bernie can't deliver on any of the many promises he's throwing around on the campaign trail.
The panic by Bernies phantom revolution over this issue proves it's all just empty retoric.