Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mhatrw

(10,786 posts)
Tue Feb 16, 2016, 12:06 PM Feb 2016

People Afraid To Vote For Sanders Because Mondale Lost to Reagan Need to Accept That Things Change.

Last edited Tue Feb 16, 2016, 02:51 PM - Edit history (4)

All of you "Hillary is more electable" apologists live in a bizarre world in which personalities have no effect on voting. For some bizarre reason, it does not matter to you that well over 50% of voters dislike Clinton, nor does it matter to you that well over 75% of voters think Clinton is untrustworthy.

To you, the only thing that affects voters is where a candidate lies on some bullshit 30-year-old corporate media and conservative think tank left-right spectrum. To you, if a candidate is too far left on this bullshit linear continuum, he or she is simply unelectable.

Taxes were once a dirty word no matter who they were applied to. But now the vast majority of Americans agrees the rich pay too far little in taxes.

Single payer healthcare was once a nonstarter, but now the vast majority of Americans knows healthcare costs are out of control and almost everybody feels the pain of the current system.

Keeping our military "strong" was once the number one national priority. But after Iraq, more and more people have come to realize what a complete counterproductive scam our constant and unending military misadventurism is.

Free trade was once all the rage. But income inequality has gotten so bad that even Thomas Friedman is now afraid to go to bat for the TPP in print.

The easiest way to get voters used to be to promise to put everyone in jail and throw away the key. But the pendulum has now swung so far in the direction of a police state that putting kids in jail for pot possession scares us more than Willie Horton does.

The current political climate in nothing like it was when a bland establishment liberal ran against a personally popular establishment conservative some 32 years ago.

Do you realize that things change? Do you understand that the pendulum swings left whenever it has gone so far right that this threatens to destroy our whole demand based economy? Have you even looked the voting preferences of those under 40? Has this made any impression on you whatsoever?

To elect Sanders in a landslide, all we have to do convince a few more people over 40 what almost everybody under 40 already knows. Enough is enough!

19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
People Afraid To Vote For Sanders Because Mondale Lost to Reagan Need to Accept That Things Change. (Original Post) mhatrw Feb 2016 OP
Mondale didn't run against Poppy 6chars Feb 2016 #1
Most of us who passed civics knows that. grossproffit Feb 2016 #3
Yes. Mondale/Ferraro lost to Reagan/Poppy. And that changes EVERYTHING about the OP! mhatrw Feb 2016 #9
Mondale lost to Poppy? NCTraveler Feb 2016 #2
Apparently, Reagan is Poppy's dad. grossproffit Feb 2016 #4
Lots and lots of redefining going on in '15 and '16. NCTraveler Feb 2016 #5
Reagan, Poppy, Clinton, Dubya mhatrw Feb 2016 #10
It was an excellent edit making it historically accurate. Thanks. NCTraveler Feb 2016 #11
Great OP, thanks! demwing Feb 2016 #6
what I want to know is-- what exactly is the upper level of support for Bernie's ideas/policies? Fast Walker 52 Feb 2016 #7
what I want to know is-- what exactly *are* Hillary's ideas? tk2kewl Feb 2016 #8
He won't be Dem Socialist in the GE. Basic LA Feb 2016 #12
SO SCARY!!! HOLD ME!!! nt mhatrw Feb 2016 #13
The country has not dramatically shifted to the left (yet) Proud Liberal Dem Feb 2016 #14
Wouldn't you agree that part of the reason for this is that no national leader has mhatrw Feb 2016 #15
Don't know Proud Liberal Dem Feb 2016 #16
idk, home to lick their wounds after realizing they had been betrayed? mhatrw Feb 2016 #17
If they feel Obama "betrayed" them Proud Liberal Dem Feb 2016 #18
Obama also constrained himself. mhatrw Feb 2016 #19
 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
2. Mondale lost to Poppy?
Tue Feb 16, 2016, 12:25 PM
Feb 2016

And Mondale has nothing to do with my support for a better option than Sanders.

mhatrw

(10,786 posts)
10. Reagan, Poppy, Clinton, Dubya
Tue Feb 16, 2016, 12:46 PM
Feb 2016

Last edited Tue Feb 16, 2016, 01:29 PM - Edit history (1)

Sorry, but they all fade into one when it comes to the destruction of the US middle class.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
11. It was an excellent edit making it historically accurate. Thanks.
Tue Feb 16, 2016, 12:49 PM
Feb 2016

It's good to be historically accurate.

 

Fast Walker 52

(7,723 posts)
7. what I want to know is-- what exactly is the upper level of support for Bernie's ideas/policies?
Tue Feb 16, 2016, 12:37 PM
Feb 2016

It's clear he is hugely popular among a large segment of liberals, but can he go higher than that?

 

tk2kewl

(18,133 posts)
8. what I want to know is-- what exactly *are* Hillary's ideas?
Tue Feb 16, 2016, 12:43 PM
Feb 2016

besides move to the right to "get things done?"

 

Basic LA

(2,047 posts)
12. He won't be Dem Socialist in the GE.
Tue Feb 16, 2016, 12:57 PM
Feb 2016

In the GE, the Repugnants will rebrand him as the biggest Commie Jew since Karl Marx. They'll wonder why he honeymooned in the Soviet Union & if that's when he became a sleeper agent. They'll play up his visits to the Sandinistas in Nicaragua & his resolve, as con. objector in Vietnam, to lead the military. Then they'll roll in with lies. We have to prepare for this. The AmeriKKKan right wing will not be as kind as Democratic primary voters. They won't put a commie in the White House. And by then, that's what he'll be to the general public.

Proud Liberal Dem

(24,426 posts)
14. The country has not dramatically shifted to the left (yet)
Tue Feb 16, 2016, 01:36 PM
Feb 2016

A majority of states currently have right-wing Republican governors and majorities in statehouses that we can't seem to get rid of despite all of the crazy things they are doing. I would like to think that either Bernie or Hillary would basically be favored to win against whatever Republican wins their nomination but we should take nothing for granted when it comes to the electorate (that votes, anyway).

mhatrw

(10,786 posts)
15. Wouldn't you agree that part of the reason for this is that no national leader has
Tue Feb 16, 2016, 02:38 PM
Feb 2016

actually STRONGLY ADVOCATED for our country to shift to the left since the Third Waywards took over the Democratic party?

Proud Liberal Dem

(24,426 posts)
16. Don't know
Tue Feb 16, 2016, 03:20 PM
Feb 2016

I thought that Barack Obama was pretty inspirational about embracing progressive policies at the national level back in 2008 and won the election rather handily. Where did all of the committed progressive activists that supported him in 2008 go after that?

Proud Liberal Dem

(24,426 posts)
18. If they feel Obama "betrayed" them
Tue Feb 16, 2016, 04:37 PM
Feb 2016

It's probably only fair to warn them that Bernie will be similarly constrained as POTUS- and they will be similarly disappointed and just give up on him too, I suppose?

mhatrw

(10,786 posts)
19. Obama also constrained himself.
Tue Feb 16, 2016, 05:11 PM
Feb 2016
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/michael-brenner/the-race-to-lose-the-whit_b_9237006.html?utm_hp_ref=politics

True, Democrats have won the White House twice. Bill Clinton did thanks to Ross Perot and then retained it against feeble opposition. In the process, he moved progressively to the Right in policy and philosophy ("the era of Big Government is over&quot . Republican ascendancy followed. Only the Bush era collapse into disaster abroad and at home made possible Barack Obama - who presented himself not as the embodiment of Democratic values but as a transcendent bipartisan healer- with just a few vermilion strokes. A prophet without message or mission. Whatever liberal ideas he had sounded were swiftly abandoned in what is surely the most shameless bait-and-switch in American political history.

This was predictable. After all, he thrice cited Ronald Reagan as the man who most influenced his view of the Presidency.

His administrations arguably were oriented to the Right of Richard Nixon -- on civil liberties as well as on economic and social programs. Look it up. His White House actually took delight in maligning "Progressives" -- as made manifest in Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel's cursing out of their representatives personally within its walls. That was the administration of which Hillary Clinton, the born-again 'progressive,' was a mainstay.

The cause already was abandoned in his first months in office when the Democrats held majorities in both houses of Congress. Indeed, Obama's embrace of the Wall Street barons was what allowed the Tea Party to channel popular anger and fear into a well-financed anti-government, know-nothing movement which nowadays dominates the political landscape. Hence, Obama drove the final nails into the coffin of the old Democratic Party.
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»People Afraid To Vote For...